Foreign Trade Policy under D. Trump: Risks and Challenges at the State Level

59
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-7-43-48
L. Lebedeva (l.lebedeva@iskran.ru),
Institute for the U.S. and Canadian Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2/3, Khlebnyi Per., Moscow, 123995, Russian Federation

Acknowledgements. The article has been supported by a grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR). Project no. 20-014-00001 “Global and Regional Effects of U.S. Economic Policy in the Second – the Beginning of the Third Decade of the 21st Century: New Challenges and Chances for Russia”.


Abstract. The paper examines the dynamics of exports and imports by states under the President D. Trump’s foreign trade policy; the effects of the unprecedented tariff raising against the United States’ trading partners that keep world trade tensions and uncertainty at high level. While these tariffs provided some protection for certain American producers who face competition with imports, many other producers met with tariffs launched in response by other countries (mainly China) against the U.S.’ exports, which hurt them in different parts of the American economy. By the way, foreign trade policy is remaining one of the topics in the pre-election campaign in states that have both benefited or lost from new tariffs. The paper points out the distribution of exports and imports by states, including products that were mainly hurt by foreign tariffs. The blow of losses driven by tariffs on American agricultural products were softened by the United States’ agricultural subsidies, but the exporters are worrying about the prospect of further escalation of tariff risks which undermine their positions, about uncertainty at foreign markets. As polls show, a large part of registered voters do not believe that current trade negotiations may result in better economic conditions for Americans. The effects of new tariffs vary by states, but in some of them, D. Trump’s trade policy may play its role in the presidential elections, especially in counties more exposed to trade losses and having no gains from the United States’ tariff protection. The economic and trade agreement between the U.S. government and the government of China is of great importance, but seems unreal.

Keywords: foreign trade policy, USA, Trump’s presidency


REFERENCES 

1. Dmitriev S.S. Predskazuemo nepredskazuemaya torgovaya politika – SShA protiv vsekh [Predictable Unpredictable Trade Policy of the US]. Kontury global’nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2018, no. 2, pp. 113-132.

2. Duesterberg Th.J. Trump’s Trade Policy at a Crossroads. Hudson Institute. 17.09.2019. Available at: https://www.hudson.org/research/15314-trump-s-trade-policy-at-a-crossroads (accessed 12.01.2020).

3. President Donald J. Trump is Signing a Landmark Phase One Trade Agreement with China. White House, 15.01.2020. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-signing-landmark-phase-one-trade-agreement-china/ (accessed 16.01.2020).

4. Weijian Shan. The Unwinnable Trade War. Foreign Affairs, November/December 2019. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2019-10-08/unwinnable-trade-war (accessed 15.01.2020).

5. International Transactions (ITA). Table 2.2. U.S. International Trade in Goods by Area and Country. US BEA Release Date: 19.12.2019. Available at: https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=62&step=1&isuri=1#reqid=62&step=1&isuri=1 (accessed 15.01.2020).

6. Trade and Trade Diversion Effects of United States Tariffs on China. UNCTAD, November 2019. Available at: https://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=2569 (accessed 10.01.2020).

7. Bown C., Jung E., Zhang E. Trump Has Gotten China to Lower Its Tariffs. Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2019. Available at: https://www.piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch/trump-has-gotten-china-lower-its-tariffsjust-toward-everyone (accessed 12.01.2020).

8. Total All Merchandise Exports. International Trade Administration. Available at: https://www.trade.gov/trade-data-analysis (accessed 12.03.2020).

9. Bown C.P., Lovely M.E. Trump’s Phase One Deal Relies on China’s State-owned Enterprises. PIIE. March 3, 2020. Available at: https://www.piie.com/blogs/trade-and-investment-policy-watch/trumps-phase-one-deal-relies-chinas-state-owned-enterprises (accessed 12.03.2020).

10. Donald Trump Hints at more Trade Aid as US Farmers Suffer “Body Blow” from Chinese Retaliation to Tariff Threat. South China Morning Post, 07.08.2019. Available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/3021718/donald-trump-hints-more-trade-aid-us-farmers-suffer-body-blow-chinese (accessed 12.01.2020).

11. USDA Announces Support for Farmers Impacted by Unjustified Retaliation and Trade Disruption. Release No. 0078.19. 23.05.2019. Available at: https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2019/05/23/usda-announces-support-farmers-impacted-unjustified-retaliation-and (accessed 12.03.2020).

12. Bidgood J. Trump Promised Wisconsin’s Farmers his Trade Wars would Pay off. They’re Still Waiting. The Boston Globe, November 2019. Available at: https://apps.bostonglobe.com/nation/politics/2019/11/voters-2020-election/wisconsin/bloomer/ (accessed 12.01.2020).

13. Trump’s Trade Wars could Cost him support. Business Insider, 31.08.2019. Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-trade-wars-support-rural-voters-battleground-states-wisconsin-2019-8?r=DE&IR=T (accessed 10.01.2020).

14. Trade under Trump. Gallup Report, 2019. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/reports/267386/trade-under-trumpgallup-briefing.aspx (accessed 12.01.2020).

15. Saad L. Americans Views Ttrade Trump Era. Gallup, 25.10.2019. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/267770/americans-views-trade-trump-era.aspx (accessed 12.01.2020).

16. Jones J.M. Americans Say U.S. – China Tariffs More Harmful Than Helpful. Gallup, 26.07.2018. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/238013/americans-say-china-tariffs-harmful-helpful.aspx (accessed 15.12.2019).

17. Trumps Trade War Gets Poor Marks. CNBC, 22.05.2019. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/22/trumps-trade-war-gets-poor-marks-in-poll-could-threaten-his-support-in-2020.html (accessed 12.01.2020).

18. Newport F. Americans Say China Trade Unfair, Trade with Canada, EU Fair. Gallup, 09.07.2018. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/236843/americans-say-china-trade-unfair-trade-canada-fair.aspx (accessed 15.12.2019).

19. U.S. Views of China Turn Sharply Negative Amid Trade Tensions. Pew Research, 13.08.2019. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/08/13/u-s-views-of-china-turn-sharply-negative-amid-trade-tensions/ (accessed 15.01.2020).

20. Casselman B., Swanson A. Survey Shows Broad Opposition to Trump Trade Policies. The New York Times, 19.09.2019. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/19/business/economy/trade-war-economic-concerns.html (accessed 12.03.2020).


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Lebedeva L. Foreign Trade Policy under D. Trump: Risks and Challenges at the State Level. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2020, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 43-48. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-7-43-48



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2023, vol. 67, No. 9
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Contradictions and Conflicts in the Multilateral Trading System 
  • Global Climate Agenda: Big Gamble 
  • South Asia in Regional and World Politics 
  • Social Policy and Public Administration Ecosystems
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.