Norways Economic Policy in the Arctic

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-5-101-108
A. Kravchuk (,
Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), 8, Sukhanova Str., Vladivostok, 690091, Russian Federation


Over the past few years, Norway’s energy policy has seen a remarkable turnaround related to the kingdom’s refusal to invest the Government Pension Fund’s money in the petroleum industry. This decision received mixed reviews from experts, who were arguing about its causes and possible consequences. In this paper the author intends to study the current state of the oil and gas sector of the Norwegian economy and development prospects for it. Oil and gas not only make up Norway’s main export item, but also allow it to occupy a more significant place in the European system of international relations due to its significant contribution to the EU’s energy security. Given the fact that the most efficient fields in the North Sea and the southern part of the Norwegian Sea are pretty close to exhaustion, Oslo needs new fields, and most of them are expected to be discovered in the Arctic. But there’s still considerable disagreement among the parties to the Treaty of Paris over the status of maritime areas around Svalbard, which remains the main obstacle in Norway’s way to arctic resources. Oslo takes a tough stance on this issue, which is not limited only by the declaration of its national interests, but is reinforced by decisive actions to protect them. As analysis shows, this policy works, but its success is largely determined by the passivity of other nations, which do not take specific measures to protect their own interests. Despite numerous threats to appeal to the UN International Court of Justice, none of the countries whose rights under the Svalbard Treaty were repeatedly violated by Norway have done it yet. Although the results of such a dispute may not be in favor of Norway, since its position on Svalbard, which was examined in the work, leaves many questions from the international law perspective. In conclusion, the modern energy policy of Norway was studied, as a result the author suggests that hydrocarbons will remain country’s principle export item in years to come, and changes in the state investment program should not be seen as an attempt to abandon oil and gas industry, but as the desire to diversify its economy.


Norway, Arctic, gas, oil, Svalbard, economy


1. Norway’s Arctic Strategy – between Geopolitics and Social Development. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

2. Overheated: Why Norway refused oil trillions (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

3. Norwegian fund will sell assets of oil and gas companies for $6 billion (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

4. Ryzhova A.V. Norvegiya osvaivaet resursy Arktiki [Norway develops Arctic resources]. RISI, 2016. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

5. Statistics Norway. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

6. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2019. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

7. Norwegian Petroleum Production and Exports. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

8. Offerdal K. Arctic Energy in EU Policy: Arbitrary Interest in the Norwegian High North. Arctic, 2010, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 30-42.

9. Shvets N.N., Belyakova M.Yu. Osnovnye principy funkcionirovaniya sistemy administrativnogo licenzirovaniya v neftegazovom komplekse Norvegii [The main principles of adminisrative licensing in oil and gas sector of Norway]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2015, no. 1 (40), pp. 176-181.

10. Norwegian Petroleum Fields. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

11. Antyushina N.M. Arkticheskii vyzov dlya nacionalnoi i mezhdunarodnoi politiki [Arctic challenges in the national and international politics]. Moscow, IE RAS, Russian Souvenir, 2012. 136 p.

12. The Shelf in 2018. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

13. The Automation of Arctic Oil: Good for Companies, Hard for Communities. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

14. The Svalbard Treaty of 09.02.1920 (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

15. Lukin Yu.F. Dogovor mezhdu Rossiei i Norvegiei – shag k mirnomu peredelu morskogo prostranstva Arktiki [The contract between Russia and Norway – a step to peaceful repartition of Arctic sea space]. Arctic and North, 2011, no. 2, pp. 59-96.

16. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

17. Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Norway on the one hand, and the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark together with the Home Rule Government of Greenland on the other hand, concerning the delimitation of the continental shelf and the fisheries zones in the area between Greenland and Svalbard of 20.02.2006. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

18. Continental Shelf Submission of Norway in Respect of Areas in the Arctic Ocean, the Barents Sea and the Norwegian Sea. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

19. Size of Norwegian Continental Shelf to the North Clarified. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

20. Treaty between the Kingdom of Norway and the Russian Federation concerning Maritime Delimitation and Cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean of 15.09.2010. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

21. Act No. 57 of 2003 Relating to Norwegian Territorial Waters and the Contiguous Zone. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

22. Churchill R., Ulfstein G. The Disputed Maritime Zones around Svalbard. Nordquist M.H., Heidar T.H., Moore J.N., eds. Changes in the Arctic Environment and the Law of the Sea. Martinus Nijhoff, 2010, pp. 551–594.

23. Wolf S. Svalbard’s Maritime Zones, their Status under International Law and Current and Future Disputes Scenarios. SWP Berlin, Working Paper FG 2, no. 2, 2013. 37 p.

24. Vylegzhanin A., Zilanov V. Spitsbergen. Legal Regime of Adjacent Marine Areas. Utrecht, Eleven International Publishing, 2007. 167 p.

25. Anderson D.H. The Status under International Law of the Maritime Areas Around Svalbard. Ocean Development & International Law, 2009, no. 40:4, pp. 373-384.

26. Continental Shelf – Questions and Answers. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

27. Royal Decree of 1963 No. 1 Relating to the Sovereignty of Norway over the Sea-Bed and Subsoil outside the Norwegian Coast. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

28. Savva V.M. Praktika Norvegii i Dogovor o Shpiczbergene (sovremennye mezhdunarodno-pravovye voprosy) [Norwegian State Practice and the Treaty Relating to Spitsbergen (Current International Law Issues)]. Moscow Journal of International Law, 2016 (3), pp. 95-103.

29. Norwegian Arctic oil reserves doubled (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

30. Licensing rounds. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

31. Russian Foreign Ministry: Norway’s decisions regarding Svalbard offshore cause concern (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

32. Oreshenkov A.M. Arkticheskii kvadrat vozmozhnostei [Arctic Square of Opportunities]. Russia in Global Affairs, 2010, no. 6. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

33. Konyshev V.N. Chto poteryala Rossiya v Barencevom more? [What did Russia lose in the Barents Sea?] VPK, 2012, no. 31 (448). Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

34. Geopolitics to help supply (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

35. Joint press conference following the 16th ministerial session of the Barents Euro-Arctic Council (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

36. Kravchuk A.A. Neorealistskii podxod k analizu voenno-politicheskoi obstanovki v Arktike [Neo-Realistic Approach to Analysis of Military-Political Situation in the Arctic]. Polis. Political Studies, 2019, no. 1, pp. 136-148.

37. Abide by the Claw: Norway’s Arctic Snow Crab Ruling Boosts Claim to Oil. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

38. Norway Wealth Fund Grows to Record 10 Trillion Crowns. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

39. The Fund Market Value. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

40. Norway Flaunts its Green Credentials – so why is It Drilling More Oil Wells? Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

41. World’s Biggest Wealth Fund Wants out of Oil and Gas. Available at:‑1-trillion-wealth-fund-wants-out-of-oil-and-gas-stocks (accessed 13.12.2019).

42. Norway will run out of oil, but welfare will remain (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

43. US Will Become a Net Oil Exporter within 10 Years, Says IEA. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Kravchuk A. Norways Economic Policy in the Arctic. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2020, vol. 64, No 5, pp. 101-108.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

Current Issue
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications.The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!
We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic versions of the I, II, III issues of 2020 of French magazine Politique étrangère are now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media.

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.


"World Eonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.


The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library or URL:

In journal
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial