Norways Economic Policy in the Arctic

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-5-101-108
A. Kravchuk (,
Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), 8, Sukhanova Str., Vladivostok, 690091, Russian Federation

Abstract. Over the past few years, Norway’s energy policy has seen a remarkable turnaround related to the kingdom’s refusal to invest the Government Pension Fund’s money in the petroleum industry. This decision received mixed reviews from experts, who were arguing about its causes and possible consequences. In this paper the author intends to study the current state of the oil and gas sector of the Norwegian economy and development prospects for it. Oil and gas not only make up Norway’s main export item, but also allow it to occupy a more significant place in the European system of international relations due to its significant contribution to the EU’s energy security. Given the fact that the most efficient fields in the North Sea and the southern part of the Norwegian Sea are pretty close to exhaustion, Oslo needs new fields, and most of them are expected to be discovered in the Arctic. But there’s still considerable disagreement among the parties to the Treaty of Paris over the status of maritime areas around Svalbard, which remains the main obstacle in Norway’s way to arctic resources. Oslo takes a tough stance on this issue, which is not limited only by the declaration of its national interests, but is reinforced by decisive actions to protect them. As analysis shows, this policy works, but its success is largely determined by the passivity of other nations, which do not take specific measures to protect their own interests. Despite numerous threats to appeal to the UN International Court of Justice, none of the countries whose rights under the Svalbard Treaty were repeatedly violated by Norway have done it yet. Although the results of such a dispute may not be in favor of Norway, since its position on Svalbard, which was examined in the work, leaves many questions from the international law perspective. In conclusion, the modern energy policy of Norway was studied, as a result the author suggests that hydrocarbons will remain country’s principle export item in years to come, and changes in the state investment program should not be seen as an attempt to abandon oil and gas industry, but as the desire to diversify its economy.

Keywords: Norway, Arctic, gas, oil, Svalbard, economy


1. Norway’s Arctic Strategy – between Geopolitics and Social Development. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

2. Overheated: Why Norway refused oil trillions (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

3. Norwegian fund will sell assets of oil and gas companies for $6 billion (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

4. Ryzhova A.V. Norvegiya osvaivaet resursy Arktiki [Norway develops Arctic resources]. RISI, 2016. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

5. Statistics Norway. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

6. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2019. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

7. Norwegian Petroleum Production and Exports. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

8. Offerdal K. Arctic Energy in EU Policy: Arbitrary Interest in the Norwegian High North. Arctic, 2010, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 30-42.

9. Shvets N.N., Belyakova M.Yu. Osnovnye principy funkcionirovaniya sistemy administrativnogo licenzirovaniya v neftegazovom komplekse Norvegii [The main principles of adminisrative licensing in oil and gas sector of Norway]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2015, no. 1 (40), pp. 176-181.

10. Norwegian Petroleum Fields. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

11. Antyushina N.M. Arkticheskii vyzov dlya nacionalnoi i mezhdunarodnoi politiki [Arctic challenges in the national and international politics]. Moscow, IE RAS, Russian Souvenir, 2012. 136 p.

12. The Shelf in 2018. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

13. The Automation of Arctic Oil: Good for Companies, Hard for Communities. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

14. The Svalbard Treaty of 09.02.1920 (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

15. Lukin Yu.F. Dogovor mezhdu Rossiei i Norvegiei – shag k mirnomu peredelu morskogo prostranstva Arktiki [The contract between Russia and Norway – a step to peaceful repartition of Arctic sea space]. Arctic and North, 2011, no. 2, pp. 59-96.

16. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

17. Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Norway on the one hand, and the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark together with the Home Rule Government of Greenland on the other hand, concerning the delimitation of the continental shelf and the fisheries zones in the area between Greenland and Svalbard of 20.02.2006. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

18. Continental Shelf Submission of Norway in Respect of Areas in the Arctic Ocean, the Barents Sea and the Norwegian Sea. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

19. Size of Norwegian Continental Shelf to the North Clarified. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

20. Treaty between the Kingdom of Norway and the Russian Federation concerning Maritime Delimitation and Cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean of 15.09.2010. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

21. Act No. 57 of 2003 Relating to Norwegian Territorial Waters and the Contiguous Zone. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

22. Churchill R., Ulfstein G. The Disputed Maritime Zones around Svalbard. Nordquist M.H., Heidar T.H., Moore J.N., eds. Changes in the Arctic Environment and the Law of the Sea. Martinus Nijhoff, 2010, pp. 551–594.

23. Wolf S. Svalbard’s Maritime Zones, their Status under International Law and Current and Future Disputes Scenarios. SWP Berlin, Working Paper FG 2, no. 2, 2013. 37 p.

24. Vylegzhanin A., Zilanov V. Spitsbergen. Legal Regime of Adjacent Marine Areas. Utrecht, Eleven International Publishing, 2007. 167 p.

25. Anderson D.H. The Status under International Law of the Maritime Areas Around Svalbard. Ocean Development & International Law, 2009, no. 40:4, pp. 373-384.

26. Continental Shelf – Questions and Answers. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

27. Royal Decree of 1963 No. 1 Relating to the Sovereignty of Norway over the Sea-Bed and Subsoil outside the Norwegian Coast. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

28. Savva V.M. Praktika Norvegii i Dogovor o Shpiczbergene (sovremennye mezhdunarodno-pravovye voprosy) [Norwegian State Practice and the Treaty Relating to Spitsbergen (Current International Law Issues)]. Moscow Journal of International Law, 2016 (3), pp. 95-103.

29. Norwegian Arctic oil reserves doubled (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

30. Licensing rounds. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

31. Russian Foreign Ministry: Norway’s decisions regarding Svalbard offshore cause concern (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

32. Oreshenkov A.M. Arkticheskii kvadrat vozmozhnostei [Arctic Square of Opportunities]. Russia in Global Affairs, 2010, no. 6. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

33. Konyshev V.N. Chto poteryala Rossiya v Barencevom more? [What did Russia lose in the Barents Sea?] VPK, 2012, no. 31 (448). Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

34. Geopolitics to help supply (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

35. Joint press conference following the 16th ministerial session of the Barents Euro-Arctic Council (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

36. Kravchuk A.A. Neorealistskii podxod k analizu voenno-politicheskoi obstanovki v Arktike [Neo-Realistic Approach to Analysis of Military-Political Situation in the Arctic]. Polis. Political Studies, 2019, no. 1, pp. 136-148.

37. Abide by the Claw: Norway’s Arctic Snow Crab Ruling Boosts Claim to Oil. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

38. Norway Wealth Fund Grows to Record 10 Trillion Crowns. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

39. The Fund Market Value. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

40. Norway Flaunts its Green Credentials – so why is It Drilling More Oil Wells? Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

41. World’s Biggest Wealth Fund Wants out of Oil and Gas. Available at:‑1-trillion-wealth-fund-wants-out-of-oil-and-gas-stocks (accessed 13.12.2019).

42. Norway will run out of oil, but welfare will remain (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

43. US Will Become a Net Oil Exporter within 10 Years, Says IEA. Available at: (accessed 13.12.2019).

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Kravchuk A. Norways Economic Policy in the Arctic. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2020, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 101-108.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment






Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies


Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 4
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Financial Contagion Propagation in Europe under the Impact of Global Shocks
  • Regional Powers on the African Continent: Trends and Prospects
  • Investment Activity of the PRC in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • “Land Grabbing” Concept: Global and National Aspects
Submit an Article
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.