The Phenomenon of Eco-Political Risk Exemplified by Yellow Vests Movement in France

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-3-36-46
A. Bordovskikh (,
Lomonosov Moscow State University, 27/4, Lomonosovskii Prosp., GSP‑1, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

Abstract. Ecological crisis represents the major challenge for democracies in the era of globalization. Researchers and experts agree that the climate change, regardless its “slow-burning” nature, constitutes the risk of dramatic economic and social transformations causing mass impoverishment, conflicts, wars and dislocation of people. Under such conditions, the democratic governments will be forced to conduct unprecedented reforms in order to resist the threat. Postponing the energy transition will only cause more drastic and extensive measures in the future. Despite general awareness of the problem, ecology remains the claimed priority which is poorly reflected in real actions of the authorities. The present article explains this obvious lack of governments’ action by the social resistance to the energy transition. This resistance remains implicit but reveals itself when the energy transition amplifies a short-term financial vulnerability of individuals. The Yellow Vests movement represents an illustration of this conflict of values. Mostly interpreted as a manifestation of a profound social crisis of liberal democracies, it originates in the ecological dilemma: people’s support of the energy transition contradicts their willingness to participate in it financially. This dilemma results in significant growth of a new type of eco-political risk having ecological origins, but taking a classical form of civil unrest and, generally, leading to political instability. In accordance with this theory, Yellow Vests movement started as a protest in response to higher ecological component of the fuel tax (especially the diesel), which was thought as a stimulus for the energy transition but became an accelerator of social tension. French polls show that people acknowledge the ecological crisis and the threat it represents. Furthermore, they await and approve the energy transition as a main condition for solving the climate change problem. Nevertheless, the same polls disclose people’s unwillingness to take their financial part of responsibility in this transition and unpreparedness for any decrease of their purchasing power. This dilemma becomes a source of political instability and social unrest especially in democratic countries, where the welfare state model is particularly well-rooted and comprises a fundamental value for people. Nonetheless, in a shortterm perspective, the energy transition has a tangible cost which public finances have no possibility to bear without raising the financial pressure on business and individuals. The public debt burden, continually increasing explicit social expenditures, off-balance-sheet liabilities including implicit pensions, and, on the other hand, extremely low economic growth do not allow any additional public spending. Thus, should the energy transition be undertaken (and there are no doubts it is the only possibility for democracies to survive), it will be financed by the business and individuals. With this perspective, researchers tend to develop a new framework for political risk analysis, where the ecological factors are significantly reinforced. While there are some studies on the expropriation risk caused by ecological transition, the civil unrest remains poorly investigated. The present article aims at investigating this new eco-political peril. The author believes, the individuals’ rejection of environmental solidarity constitutes a major factor of political instability in the liberal democracies, and it will amplify in proportion to the intensity of governments’ actions for the energy transition. The longer the democratic governments postpone the necessary climate decisions, the harder these measures will be for the people, and the stronger the consequences of the inevitable political risk.

Keywords: political risk, global ecological crisis, climate change, yellow vests movement, civil unrest, energy transition, Welfare state


1. Campisi J.M. Reconsidering Political Risk in Developed Economies. Journal of Political Risk, 2016, vol. 4, no. 8 (August). Available at: (accessed 31.03.2019).

2. Marcilly J., Ly H., Ternisien V. European Economies: Will Political Risk Spoil the Party in 2017? Panorama, October 2016. Available at: (accessed 31.03.2019).

3. Staiger U., Martill B., eds. Brexit and Beyond: Rethinking the Futures of Europe. London, UCL Press, 2018. 293 p. DOI:10.14324/111.9781787352759

4. Rosanvallon P. La Crise de l‘Etat-Providence. Paris, Seuil, 1981. 192 p.

5. Greve B., ed. The Times They Are Changing? Crisis and the Welfare State. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. 191 p.

6. Sokolov A. Politicheskii risk ot teorii k praktike [Political Risk from Theory to Practice]. Moscow, Pokolenie, 2009. 144 p.

7. Solov’ev A.I. Prinyatie gosudarstvennykh reshenii [Political Decision Making]. Moscow, Knorus, 2006. 344 p.

8. Tolstukhin O.D. Politicheskii risk kak funktsionalnaya sostavlyayushchaya sovremennoii sistemy natsionalnoii bezopasnosti Rossii. Diss. kand. polit. Nauk [Political Risk as a Functional Element of Russian National Security System. Cand. Diss (Polit.)]. Moscow, Lomonosov MSU, 2010. 163 p.

9. Knight F. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York, Augustus M. Kelley, 1964. 381 p.

10. Root F. US Business Abroad and Political Risk. MSU Business Topics, 1968, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 73-80.

11. Rummel R., Heenan D. How Multinationals Analyse Political Risk. Harvard Business Review, 1978, vol. 56, no. 1 (Jan.-Feb.), pp. 67-76.

12. Whitman M. Government Risk-Sharing in Foreign Investment. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1965. 358 p.

13. Bordovskikh A.N. Politicheskie riski mezhdunarodnogo biznesa v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Political Risks of International Business in the Face of Globalization]. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 2015. 318 p.

14. Kennedy C.R. Political Risk Management: a Portfolio Planning Model. Business Horizons, 1998, vol. 31, issue 6, pp. 26-33.

15. “Gilets jaunes”: 200 millions d’euros de degradations (Le Maire). Le Figaro, 21.03.2019. Available at: (accessed 21.03.2019).

16. Karyakin M.Yu. Strakhovanie politicheskikh riskov vneshnetorgovykh operatsii i mezhdunarodnykh investitsii [Insurance of Political Risks in Foreign Trade Operations]. Moscow, Avuarkonsalting, 2002. 144 p.

17. Bordovskikh A.N. Politicheskie riski: sovremennye problemy otsenki i teoreticheskogo modelirovaniya. Diss. kand. polit. nauk [Political Risks: Recent Problems in Evaluation and Theoretical Modeling. Cand. Diss (Polit.)]. Moscow, 2009. 195 p.

18. Amewokunu Y., Su Z. Repenser l’evaluation du risque-pays dans le contexte de la mondialisation. Management International, 2009, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 35-52.

19. Borisov N.A., Volkov V.A. Ekologicheskaya paradigma kak osnovanie politicheskoi ekologii [Ecological Paradigm as a Foundation of Political Ecology]. The Authority, 2013, no. 2, pp. 167-170.

20. Boussier R. Climate Change and Emergency. Towards New Redefinition of Emergency Concept. Public Administration E-Journal, 2018, no. 69, pp. 243-263.

21. Kravchuk M.A., Krasnov Yu.I., Malinin V.N. Global‘nyi ekologicheskii krizis: strategiya vyzhivaniya [Global Environmental Crisis: the Survival Strategy]. Society. Environment. Development (Terra Humana), 2009, no. 1, pp. 194-205.

22. Beck U. The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, Sage, 1992. 260 p.

23. Beck U. Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995. 216 p.

24. Kotova I.N. Ekologicheskie riski i ikh vliyanie na sotsial‘nye protsessy v munitsipal‘nom raione [Ecological Risks and Their Influence on Social Processes in Municipal District]. Sociology of Power, 2008, no. 3, pp. 99-107.

25. Karyakin Yu.V. Prirodnye i tekhnogennye katastrofy: novye vyzovy i ugrozy ustoichivomu razvitiyu [Natural and Anthropogenic Disasters: New Challenges and Threats to Sustainable Development]. Svobodnaya mysl’, 2010, no. 9(1616), pp. 77-90.

26. Shearman D., Smith J.W. The Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy. London, Praeger, 2007. 181 p.

27. Le Billon P., Duffy R. Conflict Ecologies: Connecting Political Ecology and Peace and Conflict Studies. Journal of Political Ecology, 2018, July 25(1), pp. 239-260.

28. Werrell C, Femia F., eds. The Arab Spring and Climate Change. A Climate and Security Correlations Series. Center for American Progress. February 2013. Available at: (accessed 15.01.2019).

29. Sternberg T. Chinese Drought, Bread and the Arab Spring. Applied Geography, 2012, May, no. 34, pp. 519-524.

30. Pepermans Y., Maeseele P. The Politicization of Climate Change: Problem or Solution? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, May 2016, no. 7(4). Available at: (accessed 01.05.2019). DOI:10.1002/wcc.405

31. Williams C. An Environmental Victimology. Social Justice, 1996, vol. 23, no. 4(66), pp. 16-40.

32. Solov‘ev A.I., Bordovskikh A.N. Policy Networks as a New Source of Political Risk. Public Administration E-Journal, 2015, no. 51, pp. 185-212.

33. Boquet A., Badré M., Feldzer G., Constantin E. Rapport. Mission de mediation relative au projet d’aeroport du Grand Ouest. Ministere de la transition ecologique et solidaire. 2017. 63 p. Available at: (accessed 01.05.2019).

34. Baughen S. Expropriation and Environmental Regulation: the Lessons of NAFTA. Journal of Environmental Law, 2006, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 207-228.

35. Piketty T. “Yellow Vests” and Tax Justice. Le Monde, 11.12.2018. Available at: (accessed 01.05.2019).

36. Rosanvallon P. Un Nouvel Age de Social. Le Monde, 10.12.2018, p. 23.

37. Bastie E. Christophe Guilluy: les “gilets jaunes” attestent la revolte de la France peripherique. Le Figaro, 19.11.2019. Available at:–20181118ARTFIG00132-christophe-guilluy-les‑8220gilets-jaunes8221-attestent-la-revolte-de-la-france-peripherique.php (accessed 01.05.2019).

38. L’écotaxe poids lourds: un echec stratégique, un abandon coûteux. Rapport public annuel 2017. Cour des comptes. Février 2017. Available at: (accessed 08.05.2019).

39. Les Français et la politique economique et ecologique du gouvernement. Ifop pour Le Journal du Dimanche. Septembre 2018, FD/JPD N°115790. Available at: (accessed 13.03.2019).

40. L’environnement et la présidentielle de 2017. Ifop pour WWF. Septembre 2018, FD/JPD N°114172. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2019).

41. Le regard des Français sur le mouvement des “Gilets jaunes”. Ifop pour Le Journal du Dimanche. Novembre 2018, FD N°115970. Available at: (accessed 15.03.2019).

42. LOI n° 2018–1213 du 24 decembre 2018 portant mesures d’urgence economiques et sociales. Available at: (accessed 01.05.2019).

43. Compte general de l’etat 2017. Annexe au projet de la loi de reglement du budget et d’approbation des comptes. Available at: (accessed 28.04.2019).

44. Moliner-Dubost M. Expropriation et environnement. Le bicentenaire de la loi du 8 mars 1810 sur l‘expropriation pour cause d‘utilité publique. Tours, dec. 2010. Universite Lyon III Jean Moulin. Available at: (accessed 01.05.2019).

45. “Gilets jaunes” et niveau de vie, les dix graphiques de la colere. Le Monde, 05.12.2019. Available at:‑10-graphiques-de-la-colere_5392911_3224.html (accessed 08.04.2019).

46. Guisse N., Hoibian S. Les Francais et leurs territoires: vecus et attentes vis-a-vis des pouvoirs publics. Collection des rapport N336. Paris, Credoc, Novembre 2017. 141 p. Available at: (accessed 08.05.2019).

47. Boussier R.F.F. Effektivnost‘ sovremennykh demokratii pered litsom global‘nykh chrezvychainykh vyzovov. Diss. kand. polit. nauk. [The Effectiveness of Modern Democracy in the Face of Global Emergencies, Cand. Diss (Polit.)]. Moscow, 2018. 175 p.

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Bordovskikh A. The Phenomenon of Eco-Political Risk Exemplified by Yellow Vests Movement in France. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2020, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 36-46.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment






Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies


Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 5
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Are There Any Ways to Break Through the Korean Nuclear Impasse?
  • Contemporary U.S. Taiwan Policy: Balancing on the Edge
  • The Gulf Monarchies’ Vision of the Global Order Transformations and the Russian Place in It
  • At Post-Soviet Space
Submit an Article
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.