The Role of Conservatism in the Development of Right-Wing Populism in Europe: The UK Case

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-2-34-41

S. Shein (,
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, 17, Malaya Ordynka Str., Moscow, 119017, Russian Federation

Abstract. The main aim of this article is to analyze the role of conservatism in the political development of the right-wing populism following the UK case. The ideational approach to the right-wing populism, emphasizing the ideological closeness of the Conservative Party and the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) as the British version of the European right-wing populism, allows us to focus on their interactions. On the one hand, conservatism has emerged as an ideological and programmatic resource for the UKIP through the use of the Eurosceptic and anti-immigrant rhetoric, populism, and “playing the referendum card” on the “European issue” in the parties’ competition process. This combination is reflected during the UKIP’s evolution from the Eurosceptic “single-issue” to the right-populist party, while conservatism, trying to move to the center of the political spectrum, has lost its monopolistic position on the right flank of British politics. On the other hand, the reaction of conservatism in response to the establishment of the UKIP as a third force in British politics was expressed in the implementation of the UKIP’s main programmatic element – a referendum on the membership in the EU, which led to the party’s disorientation and the loss of its conceptual basis. The main findings are: (1) dominance of the traditionalist or modernizing line in the Conservative Party determines the limits of possibilities of the right-wing populism; (2) the role of conservatism in the political development of right-wing populism is dual. On the one hand, right-wing populism uses the ideological and programmatic practices of conservatives, on the other hand, it loses its conceptual basis and electoral support when conservatism implements the main elements of its program.

Keywords: European conservatism, right-wing populism, Conservative Party, UKIP, United Kingdom


1. Schweitzer V. Y., ed. Partii i dvizheniya politicheskoi alternativy v sovremennoi Evrope. Doklady Instituta Evropy RAN 357 [Parties and Movements of Political Alternative in Contemporary Europe. Reports of Institute of Europe 357]. Moscow, IE RAN, 2018. 140 p.

2. Painter A. Democratic Stress, the Populist Signal and Extremist Threat: A Call for a New Mainstream Statecraft and Contact Democracy. London, Policy Network Publ., 2013. 56 p.

3. Betz H. G. Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. London, Macmillan, 1994. 226 p.

4. Gromyko Al.A. Politicheskii landshaft Evropy. Grozit li Evrope geopoliticheskoe odinochestvo? [The Political Landscape of Europe. Is Geopolitical Loneliness Threatening EU?] Nauchno-analiticheskii Vestnik IE RAN, 2018, no. 3, pp. 4-9.

5. Tevdoi-Burmuli A.I. Etnopoliticheskaya dinamika Evropeiskogo soyuza: uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vuzov [Ethnopolitical Dynamic of Contemporary EU: Textbook for Universities]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press, 2018. 224 p.

6. Mudde C. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 2004, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 542-563. DOI:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

7. Musikhin G.I. Populizm: strukturnaya kharakteristika politiki ili ushcherbnaya ideologiya? [Populism: Structural Characteristic of Ideology or “Thin-centred Ideology”?] Politiia, 2009, no. 4(55), pp. 40-53.

8. Laclau E. On Populist Reason. London, Verso, 2005. 288 p.

9. Panizza F., ed. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London, Verso, 2005. 343 p.

10. Jansen R.S. Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism. Sociological Theory, 2011, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 75-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x

11. Weyland K. Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Kaltwasser C.R., Taggart P., Espejo P.O., Ostiguy P., eds. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 48-73.

12. Freeden M. After the Brexit referendum: revisiting populism as an ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies, 2017, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1-11. DOI:10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813

13. Mudde C. The Populist Radical Right: A Pathological Normalcy. West European Politics, 2010, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1167-1186. DOI:10.1080/01402382.2010.508901

14. Vasilopoulou S. Varieties of Euroscepticism: The Case of the European Extreme Right. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 2009, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3-23.

15. Freeden M. Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003. 160 p.

16. Galkin A.A., Rahshmir P.J. Konservatizm v proshlom i nastoyashchem [Conservatism in the Past and Present]. Moscow, Nauka, 1987. 188 p.

17. Alexandre-Collier A. From Soft to Hard Brexit: UKIP’s not So Invisible Influence on the Eurosceptic Radicalisation of the Conservative Party Since 2015. Trumping the Mainstream: The Conquest of Democratic Politics by the Populist Radical Right. Herman L.E., Muldoon J., eds. London, Routledge, 2018, pp. 204-221.

18. Bale T. ‘Who leads and who follows?’ The Symbiotic Relationship Between UKIP and the Conservatives – and Populism and Euroscepticism. Politics, 2018, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 263-277. DOI:10.1177/0263395718754718

19. Webb P., Bale T. Why Do Tories Defect to UKIP? Conservative Party Members and the Temptations of the Populist Radical Right. Political Studies, 2014, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 961-970. DOI:10.1111/1467-9248.12130

20. Hayton R. Towards the Mainstream? UKIP and the 2009 Elections to the European Parliament. Politics, 2010, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 26-35. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2009.01365.x

21. Lynch P., Whitaker R. Rivalry on the Right: The Conservatives, the UK Independence Party (UKIP) and the EU Issue. British Politics, 2013, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 285-312.

22. Ford R., Goodwin M. Understanding UKIP: Identity, Social Change and the Left Behind. The Political Quarterly, 2014, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 277-284. DOI:10.1111/1467-923X.12099

23. Jeffery C., Henderson A., Scully R. England’s Dissatisfactions and the Conservative Dilemma. Political Studies Review, 2016, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 335-348. DOI:10.1177/1478929916649617

24. Widfeldt A., Brandenburg H. What Kind of Party Is the UK Independence Party? The Future of the Extreme Right in Britain or Just Another Tory Party? Political Studies, 2018, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 577-600. DOI:10.1177/0032321717723509

25. Thatcher M. Speech to the College of Europe (“The Bruges Speech”). Available at: (accessed 01.03.2019).

26. Hague’s ‘foreign land’ speech. The Guardian, 04.03.2001. Available at: (accessed 01.03.2019).

27. Kelso P. Floods, inundation, and other unspeakable words. The Guardian, 25.04.2002. Available at: (accessed 01.03.2019).

28. Tory leader begins “Euro fightback”. BBC News, 10.07.2002. Available at: (accessed 01.03.2019).

29. Full text: Iain Duncan Smith’s speech. The Guardian, 09.10.2003. Available at: (accessed 01.03.2019).

30. White M. Howard puts Europe at top of his agenda. The Guardian, 06.10.2004. Available at: (accessed 01.03.2019).

31. Kapitonova N.K. Britaniya v Evrosoyuze: evolyutsiya vzglyadov [Britain in European Union: Evolution of Views]. Dilemmy Britanii. Poisk putei razvitiya [Britain’s dilemmas: the search for development paths]. Gromyko Al.A., Anan’eva E.V., eds. Moscow, “Ves’ mir”, 2014, pp. 297-314.

32. Peregudov S.P. Liberalizm XXI veka – krizis ili obnovlenie? [The XXI Century Liberalism – Crisis of Rejuvenation]. Political Studies, 2015, no. 4, pp. 64-74. DOI:10.17976/jpps/2015.04.07

33. UK Independence Party Manifesto March 1997. Available at: (accessed 01.04.2019).

34. Bale T. Truth to tell: populism and the immigration debate. Blog LSE, 01.03.2017. Available at: (accessed 03.03.2019).

35. Hall M. UKIP: We’ll speak up for silent majority. Express, 01.03.2014. Available at: (accessed 30.03.2019).

36. UKIP Manifesto “Empowering the People”. April 2010. Available at: (accessed 01.04.2019).

37. Driver S. Understanding British Party Politics. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2011. 250 p.

38. Britain Together. UKIP 2017 Manifesto. Available at: accessed 30.03.2019).

39. Hague W. Leader’s speech, Bournemouth 1998. Available at: (accessed 30.03.2019).

40. Belinskii A.V. “Vosstanie protiv elit”: Vsplesk pravogo populizma v Evrope i krizis liberal’noi demokratii [“The Revolt Against Elites”: Radical Right Populism Surge in Western Europe]. Aktual’nye problemy Evropy, 2017, no. 2, pp. 14-36.

41. Hunt A. UKIP: The story of the UK Independence Party’s rise. 21.11.2014. Available at: (accessed 30.03.2019).

42. Banks M., Samuel H., Spillius A. Marine Le Pen: EU will collapse like the Soviet Union. The Telegraph, 16.10.2013. Available at: (accessed 30.03.2019).

43. Marine Le Pen: ‘Frexit is part of my policy’. Available at: (accessed 30.03.2019).

44. Lyvingston E. Marine Le Pen backs Britain’s membership in ‘reformed’ EU. Politico, 27.01.2019. Available at: (accessed 30.03.2019).

45. Ford R. Where the votes switched – and why: the key lessons for the parties. The Guardian, 10.05.2019. Available at: (accessed 25.03.2019).

46. Kirkup J. Ukip vote in European elections no flash in pan according to new poll. The Telegraph, 30.05.2014. Available at: (accessed 24.03.2019).

47. Lyons J. UKIP are the closet racist, says Cameron. The Independent, 04.04.2006. Available at: (accessed 24.03.2019).

48. EU Lisbon Treaty: David Cameron promises vote on future EU changes. The Telegraph, 04.11.2009. Available at: (accessed 24.03.2019).

49. EU referendum: Rebels lose vote in Commons. BBC News, 25.10.2011. Available at: (accessed 01.04.2019).

50. Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg calls for Conservative/UKIP pact. BBC News, 05.05.2013. Available at: (accessed 24.03.2019).

51. Morieson M. The Strange Life and Death of the UK Independence Party. Available at: (accessed 24.03.2019).

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Shein S. The Role of Conservatism in the Development of Right-Wing Populism in Europe: The UK Case. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2020, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 34-41.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment






Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies


Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 5
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Are There Any Ways to Break Through the Korean Nuclear Impasse?
  • Contemporary U.S. Taiwan Policy: Balancing on the Edge
  • The Gulf Monarchies’ Vision of the Global Order Transformations and the Russian Place in It
  • At Post-Soviet Space
Submit an Article
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.