452M. Gutenev (m.gutenev@mail.ru),
South Ural State University, 76, Lenina Prosp., Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russian Federation
Acknowledgements. The article has been supported by a grant of the Russian Science Foundation. Project no. 19-78-00047.
Abstract. The article discusses the formation and development of the Arctic strategy of Great Britain. The author studies the scientific component in official government documents on the Arctic. London has incentives that its advanced science demonstrates to the world Britain’s close research, historical, cultural, commercial and military ties with the Arctic. The production of knowledge that will have a global reach is one of the main opportunities for the British government to influence the international community. The government of the Kingdom is well aware that the changes occurring in the Arctic due to ice melting can bring economic benefits in the near future. The tempting prospects motivate the UK to remain one of the world’s top leaders in supporting environmental protection and international cooperation in the region. On the one hand, Britain’s science diplomacy in the Arctic is a tool of reducing tensions and strengthening cooperation with Russia in the economic, financial and political spheres. On the other hand, the scientific activity of the Kingdom in the polar region is a means to consolidate the subarctic status of the country and legitimize its presence in the polar latitudes, which in the future may allow the UK to participate in political and economic processes of the Arctic resources distribution. The joint scientific activity of Russia and Great Britain currently remains, perhaps, one of the few tools that will improve relations between the two countries in the future, establish partnership and prove that mutual cooperation can be beneficial. At the same time, it is obvious that Russia remains the main geopolitical opponent of the UK in the region. From Britain’s perspective, it destabilizes the situation in the Arctic, prevents the protection and sustainable development of the region for the common good.
Keywords: Arctic, Great Britain, Russia, NSR, Arctic Council, gas, science diplomacy
REFERENCES
1. Israel J. Dutch Primacy in World Trade: 1585–1740. Oxford, Clarendon, 2002. 488 p.
2. Depledge D. Britain and the Arctic. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 142 p.
3. The Transfer of Arctic Territories from Great Britain to Canada in 1880, and Some Related Matters, As Seen in Official Correspondence (1961 March). Available at: https://canadianmysteries.ca/sites/franklin/archive/text/TransferTerritories_en.htm (accessed 9.04.2019).
4. Staveley W. An Overview of British Defence Policy in the North. Britain and NATO’s Northern Flank. London, Macmillan Press, 1988, pp. 65-73.
5. UK-Arctic Stakeholders report of conference held at the Scottish Association for Marine Sciences, Oban 10–12 March 2008. Available at: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/pdf/gbsc_0809arcticbiodiversityobanreport.pdf (accessed 12.03.2019).
6. Depledge D. What’s in a Name? A UK Arctic Policy Framework for 2013. The Geographical Journal, 2013, no. 179, pp. 369-372.
7. Arctic Committee. Select Committee on the Arctic: Oral and Written Evidence. Available at: https://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/arctic/responding-to-a-changing-arctic-evidence.pdf (accessed 22.04.2018).
8. Johnstone R.L. An Arctic Strategy for Scotland. Arctic Yearbook, 2012, no. 1, pp. 114-129.
9. Launch of “Beyond the Ice: UK policy towards the Arctic”. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/launchof-beyond-the-ice-uk-policy-towards-the-arctic (accessed 17.04.2019).
10. China’s Arctic Policy. The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China published a white paper titled “China’s Arctic Policy” on Jan 26. Available at: http://english.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2018/01/26/content_281476026660336.htm (accessed 15.03.2019).
11. Antyushina N.M. Arktika: novyi format mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva [Arctic: a new format of international cooperation]. Moscow, Institut Evropy RAS, 2014. 138 p.
12. New frontiers in science diplomacy: navigating the changing balance of power. London, Science Policy Centre, 2010. 32 p.
13. Natural Environment Research Council. Available at: https://nerc.ukri.org/ (accessed 18.04.2019).
14. The UK Arctic science community is active and growing. Available at: https://www.bas.ac.uk/about/the-arctic/britain-in-thearctic/ (accessed 09.04.2019).
15. In Britain began to build polar naval ship “Sir David Attenborough” (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-37682980 (accessed 19.04.2019).
16. UK Science and Innovation Network. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/world/organisations/uk-science-and-innovationnetwork (accessed 23.12.2018).
17. UK Research and Innovation. Available at: https://www.ukri.org/about-us/ (accessed 09.02.2019).
18. Henry Burgess spoke about the promising areas of cooperation between the UK and Russia in the Arctic (In Russ.) Available at: https://narfu.ru/university/structure/direction/rector/meetings/302106/ (accessed 09.01.2019).
19. UK Arctic Science Conference 2017. Available at: https://www.arctic.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/UKASC_2017.pdf (accessed 26.09.2019).
20. UK – Russia Arctic Bursaries Programme 2019. Available at: https://www.arctic.ac.uk/news/uk-russia-arctic-bursaries-programme-2019/ (accessed 26.09.2019).
21. Japan, Denmark and Norway want to use the North Sea Route (In Russ.) Available at: https://teknoblog.ru/2019/09/09/101305 (accessed 26.09.2019).
22. On Thin Ice: UK Defense in the Arctic. Twelfth Report of Session 2017–19. Available at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmdfence/388/388.pdf (accessed 09.01.2019).
23. Britain enters the battle for the Arctic (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.ng.ru/world/2018-09-30/6_7321_arctic.html (accessed 18.03.2019).
24. Mart’yanov V.S., Pankevich N.V., Startsev Ya.Yu., Emikh V.V. Interesy mirovykh derzhav v Arktike po rezul’tatam monitoringa vedushchikh SMI. [The interests of the world powers in the Arctic as a result of monitoring of the leading media]. Sotsium i vlast’, 2017, no. 2(64), pp. 41-52.
Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX
No comments