Models of Regional Leadership in Eurasia: to the New Research Agenda

62
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-11-114-123
National Research University Higher School of Economics (St. Petersburg), 123, anala Griboedova Nab., Saint Petersburg, 190068, Russian Federation;
I. Grigoriev (igrigoriev@hse.ru), 
National Research University Higher School of Economics (St. Petersburg), 123, anala Griboedova Nab., Saint Petersburg, 190068, Russian Federation;
A. Dekalchuk (adekalchuk@hse.ru), 
National Research University Higher School of Economics (St. Petersburg), 123, anala Griboedova Nab., Saint Petersburg, 190068, Russian Federation;
Y. Kabanov (ykabanov@hse.ru), 
National Research University Higher School of Economics (St. Petersburg), 123, anala Griboedova Nab., Saint Petersburg, 190068, Russian Federation;
S. Krivokhizh (skrivokhizh@hse.ru), 
National Research University Higher School of Economics (St. Petersburg), 123, anala Griboedova Nab., Saint Petersburg, 190068, Russian Federation;
E. Soboleva (edsoboleva@hse.ru), 
National Research University Higher School of Economics (St. Petersburg), 123, anala Griboedova Nab., Saint Petersburg, 190068, Russian Federation


Abstract

One of the important tasks in the study of international politics today is the elaboration and empirical verification of new theoretical models for the coexistence of several regional leadership projects, simultaneously implemented by various countries and international organizations. Until now, the existing models, as a rule, have described this kind of leadership at the international arena in fundamentally hierarchical terms: either as a unipolar world with a hegemonic country dominating global politics, or as a bipolar system. These models unambiguously assume that the world either “belongs” to one hegemon, or is divided between two superpowers. In the latter case, there are practically no regions where both leadership projects would be carried out simultaneously, since such a geographical “overlap” would inevitably provoke conflict. Meanwhile, the task of understanding and explaining the internal mechanics of the simultaneous coexistence of several potential leaders on the same geographic territory for a fairly long time remains unsolved. In the modern world, such parallel (joint or competitive) leadership can no longer be regarded as an anomaly or a temporary phenomenon, it becomes a “new normality”, creating additional opportunities for international players, but at the same time imposing more substantial constraints on them. Thus, the relevance of the agenda put forward in the article is determined by a number of circumstances, the most fundamental of which is the crisis of the global governance system and the neoliberal model of globalization. Today, macro-regions become “building blocks” for the multipolar structure of the world, and the role of individual states or their groups, which begin to play a structure-forming role in “their” macro-regions, is increasing. These are potential leaders with special characteristics and special relations with their “followers”. The problem of leadership is most interestingly actualized in the Eurasian region, the internationalization of which is rapidly growing. In this region, several leaders are observed (such as Russia, China, the European Union) who compete for the same followers, offering them different agendas and using a wide range of power tools – from “soft” to “hard” power. It is in Eurasia that the variability of relations connecting the leader and followers is extremely high. In this article, the authors put forward and ground the possibility and necessity of developing a research agenda on regional leadership based on the material of modern Eurasia – the most important world macro-region where three leadership projects are being successfully implemented at the same time, the description and analysis of which in their interconnection go beyond the Eurasian theme only and can help advance our understanding of the nature of multipolarity in modern international relations.

Acknowledgements. The article has been supported by a grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR). Project 19-014-00030 “Leadership Models in Multipolar World: Comparative Analysis of Strategies of Russia, China and the European Union in Eurasian Region”.

 


Keywords

regional leadership, international relations, Eurasia, Russia, China, European Union


REFERENCES

  1. Zakaria F. The Post-American World. New York, W. W. Norton & Company, 2008. 292 p.
  2. Lake D. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2009. 232 p.
  3. Layne C. This Time It’s Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana. International Studies Quarterly, 2012, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 203-213. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00704.x
  4. Donnelly J. Rethinking Political Structures: From “Ordering Principles” to “Vertical Differentiation” – and Beyond. International Theory, 2009, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 49-86. DOI: 10.1017/S1752971909000037
  5. Nabers D. Power, Leadership, and Hegemony in International Politics: The Case of East Asia. Review of International Studies, 2010, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 931-949. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210510001373
  6. Waltz K. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove (Illinois), Waveland Press, 1979. 251 p.
  7. Morgenthau H. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York, Alfred A. Knope, 1967. 615 p.
  8. Mearsheimer J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York, W. W. Norton & Company, 2001. 555 p.
  9. Lukes S. Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. 192 p.
  10. Young O. Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society. International Organization, 1991, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 281-308. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300033117
  11. Ikenberry G.J., Kupchan C. Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization, 1990, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 283-315.
  12. Williams L. Abundance, Lack, and Identity. Journal of Political Ideologies, 2007, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 109-126. DOI: 10.1080/13569310701284951
  13. Dawisha K., Parrott B. Russia and the New States of Eurasia: The Politics of Upheaval. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994. 437 p.
  14. Tsygankov A. Mastering Space in Eurasia: Russia’s Geopolitical Thinking after the Soviet Break-Up. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 2003, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 101-127. DOI: 10.1016/S0967-067X(02)00055-7
  15. Smith G. The Masks of Proteus: Russia, Geopolitical Shift and the New Eurasianism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1999, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 481-494. DOI: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.1999.t01-2-00481.x
  16. Wilson J. The Russian Pursuit of Regional Hegemony. Rising Powers Quarterly, 2017, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7-25.
  17. Nygren B. The Rebuilding of Greater Russia: Putin’s Foreign Policy towards the CIS Countries. London, Routledge, 2007. 352 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203939901
  18. MacFarlane S. N. Contested Regional Leadership: Russia and Eurasia. Regional Powers and Contested Leadership. Ebert H., Flemmes D., eds. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, pp. 275-299. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73691-4_10
  19. Cooley A. Whose Rules, Whose Sphere? Russian Governance and Influence in Post-Soviet States. Washington, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2017. 12 p.
  20. Freire M.R., Kanet R. Introduction: Russia and Its Near Neighbours. Russia and Its Near Neighbours. Freire M.R., Kanet R., eds. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.1057/9780230390164_1
  21. Monaghan A. Russia’s Energy Diplomacy: A Political Idea Lacking a Strategy? Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 2007, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 275-288. DOI: 10.1080/14683850701402201
  22. Lebedeva M., Kharkevich M. “Myagkaya sila” Rossii v razvitii integratsionnykh protsessov na evraziiskom prostranstve [Russia’s Soft Power in Developing integration in Eurasia]. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta, 2014, no. 2 (35), pp. 10-13.
  23. Ćwiek-Karpowicz J. Limits to Russian Soft Power in the Post-Soviet Area. Economization versus Power Ambitions: Rethinking Russia’s Policy Towards Post-Soviet States. Meister S., ed. Baden-Baden, DGAP and Nomos, 2013, pp. 47-58. DOI: 10.5771/9783845241968-47
  24. Libman A., Obydenkova A. Regional International Organizations as a Strategy of Autocracy: The Eurasian Economic Union and Russian Foreign Policy. International Affairs, 2018, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1037-1058. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiy147
  25. Way L. The Limits of Autocracy Promotion: The Case of Russia in the ‘near Abroad’. European Journal of Political Research, 2015, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 691-706. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12092
  26. Cadier D. Eastern Partnership vs Eurasian Union? The EU–Russia Competition in the Shared Neighbourhood and the Ukraine Crisis. Global Policy, 2014, vol. 5, pp. 76-85. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12152
  27. Lukin A. Russia, China, and the Emerging Greater Eurasia. International Relations and Asia’s Northern Tier. Rozman G., Radchenko S., eds. Singapore, Palgrave, 2018, pp. 75-91. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3144-1_5
  28. Meister S. Hedging and Wedging: Strategies to Contest Russia’s Leadership in Post-Soviet Eurasia. Regional Powers and Contested Leadership. Ebert H., Flemmes D., eds. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, pp. 301-326. DOI: 10.1007/978-3- 319-73691-4_11
  29. Chan G. China’s Response to the Global Financial Crisis and Its Regional Leadership in East Asia. Asia Europe Journal, 2012, vol. 9, no. 2-4, pp. 197-209. DOI: 10.1007/s10308-012-0306-6
  30. Breslin S. Understanding China’s Regional Rise: Interpretations, Identities and Implications. International Affairs, 2009, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 817-835. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00829.x
  31. Lam P., Lim T., eds. The Rise of China and India: A New Asian Drama. Singapore, World Scientific, 2009. 176 p. DOI: 10.1142/7381
  32. Park J. Regional Leadership Dynamics and the Evolution of East Asian Regionalism. Pacific Focus, 2012, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 290-318. DOI: 10.1111/j.1976-5118.2012.01085.x
  33. Kaczmarski M. Russian-Chinese Relations in Eurasia: Harmonization or Subordination? Helsinki, Finnish Institute of International Affairs, 2018. 7 p.
  34. Glenn J.G. China’s Challenge to US Supremacy: Economic Superpower versus Rising Star. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 257 p. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-349-95157-4
  35. Hsiung J. China into Its Second Rise: Myths, Puzzles, Paradoxes, and Challenge to Theory. Singapore, World Scientific, 2012. 340 p. DOI: 10.1142/7940
  36. Krivokhizh S., Soboleva E. Drevnost’ na sluzhbe sovremennosti: teoriya moral’nogo realizma Yan’ Syuetuna i budushchee mirovogo poryadka [The Past Serving the Present: Yan Xuetong’s Theory of Moral Realism and the Future of the Global Order]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2017, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 76-84. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-11-76-84
  37. Dian M., Menegazzi S. New Regional Initiatives in China’s Foreign Policy: The Incoming Pluralism of Global Governance. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 136 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75505-2
  38. Luttwak E. The Rise of China vs. the Logic of Strategy. Harvard University Press, 2012. 320 p.
  39. Sjursen H., ed. Civilian or Military Power? European Foreign Policy in Perspective. London, Routledge, 2013. 176 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315878874
  40. Busygina I. Russia–EU Relations and the Common Neighborhood: Coercion vs. Authority. London, Routledge, 2017. 250 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315443966
  41. Manners I. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 2002, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 235-258. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00353
  42. Delcour L. Shaping the Post-Soviet Space? EU Policies and Approaches to Region-Building. London, Routledge, 2016. 194 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315608846
  43. Haukkala H. The Russian Challenge to EU Normative Power: The Case of European Neighbourhood Policy. The International Spectator, 2008, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 35-47. DOI: 10.1080/03932720802057117
  44. Haukkala H. The European Union as a Regional Normative Hegemon: The Case of European Neighbourhood Policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 2008, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 1601-1622. DOI: 10.1080/09668130802362342
  45. Delcour L. The EU and Russia in Their “Contested Neighbourhood”: Multiple External Influences, Policy Transfer and Domestic Change. London, Routledge, 2017. 180 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315644370
  46. Ambrosio T. Authoritarian Backlash: Russian Resistance to Democratization in the Former Soviet Union. Farnham, Burlington, Ashgate, 2009. 240 p.
  47. Haukkala H. From Cooperative to Contested Europe? The Conflict in Ukraine as a Culmination of a Long-Term Crisis in EU–Russia Relations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 2015, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 25-40. DOI: 10.1080/14782804.2014.1001822
  48. Dellios R., Ferguson R. J. China’s Quest for Global Order: From Peaceful Rise to Harmonious World. Lanham, MD, Lexington Books, 2012. 161 p.
  49. Luhmann N. Globalization or World Society: How to Conceive of Modern Society? International Review of Sociology, 1997, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 67-79. DOI: 10.1080/03906701.1997.9971223

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Busygina I., Grigoriev I., Dekalchuk A., Kabanov Y., Krivokhizh S., Soboleva E. Models of Regional Leadership in Eurasia: to the New Research Agenda. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2020, vol. 64, No 11, pp. 114-123. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-11-114-123



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed
 
Current Issue
2021, vol. 65, No. 4

Topical Themes of the Issue:

  •  Coronacrisis in the EU: a Knock-Down or a Jump-Off for Integration? 
  •  Latin America in the South-South Cooperation Against the Background of Globalization Controversies 
  •  Reforming the Saudi Economy: Results and Perspectives 
  •  Non-Western Theories of Development in the Global Capitalism Era
  •  About an Attempt to Create a Theory of International Relations in IMEMO in the 1970s
View This Issue (2021, vol. 65, No. 4)
Submit an Article
Announcement

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications.The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.


Dear colleagues, authors and readers!
We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic versions of the IV issue of 2020 and I issue of 2021 of French magazine Politique étrangère are now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media.
NEW SECTION

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.

CONTEST!

"World Eonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE JOURNAL

The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library eLIBRARY.ru or URL: https://press.gaugn.ru/.

In journal
Years
2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial