85Acknowledgements. The article has been supported by a grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR). Project ¹ 17-03-00566 “The Settlement Level of Local Governance in Russia: Political Situation and Problems of Development”.
Abstract. In this article, the electoral turnout in the municipal elections held in post-communist states is compared. Using correlation analysis, comparing electoral turnout and its change as well as municipal/national electoral gap, the authors reveal principal features of the electoral behavior in the local elections. The study shows that the electoral turnout is not affected by the level of political competition and a size of municipalities either in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) or in Russia. However, the turnout itself which is usually low can be explained with the use of the second-order elections theory. At the same time, the ongoing change does not prove the increasing number of disinterested or disappointed voters in some of the consolidated CEE democracies. On the contrary, a number of CEE states demonstrate a growing interest of voters towards a local government, sometimes by contrast with a real disappointment in national politics. Indeed, more successful democracies in the Northern part of Central and Eastern Europe usually deliver a higher turnout level. In Russian cities, the crucial influence of pro-regime mobilization is in evidence, while poorly developed civic culture of participation depresses the turnout. As a result, under conditions of weak interest of Russian authorities to boost turnout in the local elections, Russia experiences a natural decline in voter turnout also reflecting poor social efficiency of municipal authorities, which puts the country seriously behind CEE in terms of electoral turnout. Thus, the more successful consolidation of democracy in the CEE states has created a turning point between growing and falling interest in local elections in different states and/or cities depending on individual political developments at the national level. Meanwhile, Russia experiences its own “natural” development resulting in falling local turnout caused by the lack of interest both from local communities and authorities.
Keywords: electoral behavior, municipal elections, post-communist states, local government, electoral turnout
REFERENCES
1. Reif K., Schmitt H. Nine Second-Order National Elections: a Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results. European Journal of Political Research, 1980, no. 8, pp. 3-44. Available at: https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x (accessed 17.08.2019).
2. Turovsky R.F. Prezidentskie vybory v Rossii: Vozmozhnosti i predely elektoral’noi konsolidatsii [Presidential Elections in Russia: Possibilities and Limits of Electoral Consolidation]. Politeia, 2018, no. 2, pp. 23-50.
3. Linz J.J., Stepan A. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. 479 ð.
4. Gasiorowski M.J., Timothy J. Power. The Structural Determinants of Democratic Consolidation Evidence from the Third World. Comparative Political Studies, 1998, no. 31 (6), pp. 740-771. DOI:10.1177/0010414098031006003
5. Svolik M. Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation. American Political Science Review, 2008, no. 102 (2), pp. 153-168.
6. Kostelka F. Does Democratic Consolidation Lead to a Decline in Voter Turnout? Global Evidence Since 1939. American Political Science Review, 2017, vol. 111, issue 4, pp. 653-667. DOI:10.1017/S0003055417000259
7. Pacek A.C., Pop-Eleches G., Tucker J.A. Disenchanted or Discerning: Voter Turnout in Post-Communist Countries. Journal of Politics, 2009, vol. 71, issue 2, pp. 473-491. DOI:10.1017/S0022381609090409
8. Kostadinova T. Voter Turnout Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 2003, no. 42 (6), pp. 741-759. DOI:10.1111/1475-6765.00102
9. Inglehart R., Catterberg G. Trends in Political Action: The Developmental Trend and the Post-Honeymoon Decline. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 2002, no. 43, pp. 300-316.
10. William M., Rose R. Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluations of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-Communist Societies. The Journal of Politics, 1997, no. 59 (2), pp. 418-451.
11. Bernhagen P., Marsh M. Voting and Protesting: Explaining Citizen Participation in Old and New European Democracies. Democratization, 2007, no. 14 (1), pp. 44-72. DOI:10.1080/13510340601024298
12. Gaivoronskii Yu.O. Regional’nye politicheskie rezhimy v Rossii: kontseptual’nye novatsii i vozmozhnosti izmereniya [Regional Political Regimes in Russia: Conceptual Innovations and Opportunities of Measurement]. Politeia, 2015, no. 2, pp. 21-37.
13. Turovsky R.F. Mestnoe samoupravlenie v Rossii i evolyutsiya politicheskogo rezhima [Local Governance in Russia and Evolution of Political Regime]. Pro Nunc. Modern Political Process, 2015, no. 1 (14), pp. 82-98.
14. Jackman R. Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies. American Political Science Review, 1987, no. 81 (2), pp. 405-423. DOI:10.2307/1961959
15. Powell B. American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective. The American Political Science Review, 1986, no. 80 (1), pp. 17-43. DOI:10.2307/1957082
16. Blais A., Dobrzynska A. Turnout in Electoral Democracies, European Journal of Political Research, 1998, no. 33, pp. 239-262. DOI:10.1023/A:1006802916256
17. Blais A., Massicotte L., Dobrzynska A. Why is Turnout Higher in Some Countries Than in Others? Ottawa: Elections Canada, 2003. Available at: https://www.elections.ca/res/rec/part/tuh/TurnoutHigher.pdf (accessed 07.01.2019).
18. Rose R. Voter Turnout in the European Union Member Countries. Pintor R.L., Gratschew M., eds. Voter Turnout in Western Europe Since 1945. Stockholm, International IDEA, 2004, pp. 17-24.
19. Perez-Linan A. Neoinstitutional Accounts of Voter Turnout: Moving beyond Industrial Democracies. Electoral Studies, 2001, no. 20 (2), pp. 281-297. DOI:10.1016/s0261-3794(00)00019-6
20. Fornos A., Power J., Garand C. Explaining Voter Turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000. Comparative Political Studies, 2004, no. 37 (8), pp. 909-940. DOI:10.1177/0010414004267981
21. Blais A., Aarts K. Electoral Systems and Turnout. Acta Polit, 2006, no. 41 (2), pp. 180-196. DOI:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500148
22. Turovsky R.F. “Vozvrashchenie” odnomandatnykh okrugov: evolyutsiya mazhoritarnoi sistemy na parlamentskikh vyborakh v Rossii [“Retrieval” of Single-Member Constituencies: the Evolution of Majority Electoral System on Parliamentary Elections in Russia]. Materialy XVIII Aprel’skoi mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva [XVIII April International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development Problems]. Moscow, 2017. Available at: https://conf.hse.ru/2017/ (accessed 09.01.2019).
23. Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.cikrf.ru/ (accessed 03.01.2019).
24. The Central Election Commission (Albania). Available at: http://cec.org.al/ (accessed 03.01.2019).
25. Central Electoral Commission. Election Results (Bulgaria). Available at: https://results.cik.bg/index.html (accessed 03.01.2019).
26. National Election Office (Hungary). Available at: https://www.valasztas.hu/ (accessed 03.01.2019).
27. Central Election Commission of Latvia. Available at: https://www.cvk.lv/lv (accessed 03.01.2019).
28. The Central Electoral Commission of the Republic of Lithuania. Available at: https://www.vrk.lt/en/home (accessed 03.01.2019).
29. National Electoral Commission. National Election Office (Poland). Available at: https://pkw.gov.pl/ (accessed 03.01.2019).
30. Biroul Electoral Central (Romania). Available at: http://parlamentare2016.bec.ro/index.html (accessed 03.01.2019).
31. Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic. Elections and Referenda. Available at: https://volby.statistics.sk/index.html (accessed 03.01.2019).
32. State Election Commission (Slovenia). Available at: https://www.dvk-rs.si/index.php/si (accessed 03.01.2019).
33. State Electoral Commission of the Republic of Croatia. Available at: https://www.izbori.hr/site/en/homepage/18 (accessed 03.01.2019).
34. Czech Statistical Office. Results of Elections and Referendums. Available at: https://www.volby.cz/ (accessed 03.01.2019).
35. Valimised (Estonia). Available at: https://www.valimised.ee/en (accessed 03.01.2019).
36. Akhremenko A.S. Elektoral’noe uchastie i absenteizm v rossiiskikh regionakh: zakonomernosti i tendentsii [Electoral Participation and Absenteeism in the Regions of Russia: Regularities and Tendencies]. MSU Vestnik, 2005, no. 3, pp. 95-113.
37. Panov P., Ross C. Explanatory Factors for Electoral Turnout in the Russian Federation: The Regional Dimension. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 2016, no. 24 (3), pp. 51-70.
38. Laakso M., Taagepera R. Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 1979, no. 12, pp. 13-27.
39. Turovsky R., Korneeva E. The Institutional Impact on Voter Turnout: the Case of Russia and Its Regions (2011–2016). Russian Politics, 2018, no. 3, pp. 372-395. DOI:10.1163/2451-8921-00303004
Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX
No comments