Perspectives of Hegemony in the Eastern Asia in Light of the World-System Approach

248
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-1-35-45

S. Yachin (yachin.se@dvfu.ru),
Far Eastern Federal University, 8, Sukhanova Str., Vladivostok, Primorskii Krai, 690950, Russian Federation;
I. Kupriyashkin (kupryashkin.iv@dvfu.ru),
Far Eastern Federal University, 8, Sukhanova Str., Vladivostok, Primorskii Krai, 690950, Russian Federation;
Mei-Lan Hung (mlhung68@gmail.com),
National Chengchi University, No. 64, Sec. 2, ZhiNan Rd., Wenshan District, Taipei City 11605, Taiwan (R.O.C)

Acknowledgements. The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 17-27-10001-ÎÃÍ and Taiwanese Ministry of Science and Technology MOST: 106-2923-H-004-001-MY3.


Abstract. The world-system approach, which nowadays is seen as a wide range of interdisciplinary researches, studies the human world as a primarily interconnected and hierarchically organized system, where there is always a Center eligible for hegemony, a subordinate periphery and a half-periphery that possesses its own reproduction resources. In terms of evaluating the perspectives and creating scenarios of to-be balance of power in the Eastern Asia, this approach allows considering that the world system has reached the new phase envelope, to which the previous criteria cannot be fully applicable. Economic power of modern humanity reached the volume that allows to overpass the very market dependence of periphery from the Center, which is generally typical for the world economy. The cultural determinants of generation and diffusion of innovations assume greater importance as part of the process forming a new relational system, which can be called “world culture”. Such a principle of system integration means the irrelevance of that form of hegemony, typical for the previous world economy. Against the background of universal mobility and extraordinary significance of human capital, the states as centers of power (power politics) are involved into a special type of business struggle as Attractive Centers for the capital of this kind, where “creative community” is a key element. Considering these factors, one can predict the end of hegemony as a notion and the beginning of the genuine multipolar world. The USA would secure the leadership as a top creative economy, but cannot be characterized as a hegemon anymore because of the absence of leverage on decision-making process in “sequacious” countries and regions. China as a leader in Eastern Asia would not count on being a hegemon in old terms, and even in new ones, due to ethnic and political factors inherent to Chinese people that preclude it from taking the lead of the global “creative community”.

Keywords: world-system approach, diffusionism, hegemony, soft power, cultural transfer, creative community


REFERENCES

1. Wallerstein I. The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York, San Francisco, London, Academic Press, 2011. 410 p.

2. Wallerstein I. The Modern World-System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy (1600–1750). New York, San Francisco, London, Academic Press, 2011. 370 p.

3. Wallerstein I. The Modern World-System III: The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy, 1730s – 1840s. Berkeley, University of California Press, 2011. 372 p.

4. Wallerstein I. The Modern World-System IV: Centrist Liberalism Triumphant, 1789–1914. Berkeley, University of California Press, 2011. 396 p.

5. Wallerstein I. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham and London, Duke University Press, 2004. 110 p.

6. Frank A.G. ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press, 2011. 352 ð.

7. Arrighi G. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times. London, Verso, 1994. 400 ð.

8. Arrighi G. Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-first Century. New York, Verso, 2007. 418 ð.

9. Abu-Lughod J.L. Before European Hegemony: The World System, A.D. 1250–1350. New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1989. 443 ð.

10. Reformating the System of International Relations in Pacific Asia: Vectors and Dynamics of Changes (Part I). Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye, 2018, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 100-108 (In Russ.) DOI:10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-12-100-108

11. Reformating the System of International Relations in Pacific Asia: Vectors and Dynamics of Changes (Part II). Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 112-122 (In Russ.) DOI:10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-1-112-122

12. Luo Z. Intrastate Dynamics in the Context of Hegemonic Decline: A Case Study of China’s Arms Transfer Regime. Journal of World-System Research, 2017, vol. 23, no. 1, ðð. 36-61. DOI: 10.5195/jwrs.2017.600

13. Karatasli S.S., Kumral S. Territorial Contradictions of the Rise of China: Geopolitics, Nationalism and Hegemony in Comparative-Historical Perspective. Journal of World-System Research, 2017, vol. 23, no. 1, ðð. 5-35. DOI:10.5195/jwrs.2017.591

14. Gulick J. The Long Twentieth Century and Barriers to China’s Hegemonic Accession. Journal of World-Systems Research, 2011, vol. XVII, no. 1, pp. 4-38.

15. McNeill W.H. The Rise of the West: A History of the Human Community. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1963. 860 ð.

16. Chase-Dunn C., Thomas D.H. Rise and Demise: Comparing World-Systems. Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1997. 322 ð.

17. Korotaev A.V., Khalturina D.A., Malkov A.S., Bozhevol’nov Yu.V., Kobzeva S.V., Zin’kina Yu.V. Zakony istorii: Matematicheskoe modelirovanie i prognozirovanie mirovogo i regional’nogo razvitiya [The Laws of Yistory: Mathematical Modeling and Forecasting of Global and Regional Development]. Moscow, URSS, 2010. 344 p.

18. Anderson P. Peripetii gegemonii [Peripetia Hegemony]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Instituta Gaidara, 2018. 296 ð.

19. Althusser L. Ideologiya i ideologicheskie apparaty gosudarstva [The Ideology and Ideological Apparatus of the State]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2011, no. 3 (77). Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2011/3/al3.html (accessed 20.06.2019).

20. Harrison L., Huntington S., eds. Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. New York, Basic Books, 2000. 348 p.

21. Urry J. Mobilities. Cambridge, Polity, 2007. 336 p.

22. Florida R. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure and Everyday Life. New York, Basic Books, 2002. 404 ð.

23. Florida R. Cities and the Creative Class. New York, Routledge, 2005. 208 ð.

24. Florida R. The Flight of the Creative Class. The New Global Competition for Talent. New York, Harper Business, Harper Collins, 2005. 320 ð.

25. Giddens A. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Vol. 2. The Nation State and Violence. Cambridge, Polity, 1985. 408 ð.

26. Murdock G.P. Social Structure. New York, The MacMillan Company, 1949. 428 ð.

27. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1984. 402 ð.

28. Durkheim E. O razdelenii obshchestvennogo truda. Metod sotsiologii [On the division of social labor. Sociology Method]. Moscow, Nauka, 1991. 575 ð.

29. Castells M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul’tura [Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture]. Moscow, GU VShE, 2000. 608 ð.

30. Nye J.S. Limits of American Power. Political Science Quarterly, 2016, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 267-283.

31. Moles À.À. Sociodynamique de la culture. Paris, La Haye, 1967. 343 ð.

32. Demeter M. The World-Systemic Dynamics of Knîwldge Production: The Distribution of Transnational Academic Capital in the Social Sciences. Journal of World-System Research, 2019, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 111-144. DOI:10.5195/jwrs.2019.887

33. Bell D. The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York, Basic Books, 1976. 301 ð.

34. Wallerstein I. What about China? Commentary, 2017, no. 460. Available at: https://iwallerstein.com/what-about-china/ (accessed 10.06.2019).

35. Wallerstein I. The End of the World as We Know It: Social Science for the Twenty-First Century. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press, 1999. 278 p.

36. Wallerstein I. China and the United States: Partners? Commentary, 2017, no. 441. Available at: https://www.iwallerstein.com/china-and-the-united-states-partners (accessed 10.06.2019).

37. Arrighi G., Harvey D. The Winding Paths of Capital. New Left Review, 2009, vol. 56, pp. 61-94.

38. Ho-Fung Hung. Hegemonic Crisis, Comparative World-Systems, and the Future of Pax Americana. Journal of World-Systems Research, 2017, vol. 23, no 2, ðð. 637-648. DOI:10.5195/jwsr.2017.723

39. Wang J., Wu L. Can China Be a Benign Hegemony? APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1902877 (accessed 12.06.2019).

40. Herrington M.L. Why the Rise of China Will Not Lead to Global Hegemony. July 15, 2011. Available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2011/07/15/why-the-precarious-rise-of-china-will-not-lead-to-global-hegemony (accessed 29.06.2019).

41. Naidu N. China’s Grand Strategy and the New Silk Road: A World-Systems View. 2017. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/38023726 (accessed 29.06.2019).

42. Ikenberry J.G. From Hegemony to the Balance of Power: The Rise of China and American Grand Strategy in East Asia. International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, 2014, vol. 23, no. 2, ðp. 41-63.

43. Grell-Brisk M. China and Global Economic Stratification in an Interdependent World. Palgrave Communications, 2017, vol. 3. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.87 (accessed 02.07.2019).

44. Borokh O., Lomanov A. Ot “myagkoi sily” k “kul’turnomu mogushchestvu” [From “soft power” to “cultural power”]. Russia in Global Affairs, 2012, no. 4. Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/number/Ot-myagkoi-sily-k-kulturnomu-moguschestvu-15643 (accessed 01.07.2019).

45. Jinping X. Secure a Decisive Victory in Building a Moderately Prosperous. Available at: http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/download/Xi_Jinping’s_report_at_19th_CPC_National_Congress.pdf (accessed 02.07.2019).


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Yachin S., Kupriyashkin I., Mei-Lan Hung Perspectives of Hegemony in the Eastern Asia in Light of the World-System Approach. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2020, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 35-45. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-1-35-45



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2025, vol. 69, No. 1
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Global Trends in Robotics
  • Legal Support of China’s Foreign Policy
  • Latin America in the Context of a Changing World Order
  • Is Legal Self-Restraint of Western Hegemony Possible?
Announcement

Dear authors of the journal!

Please note that the author's copies of the issues in which your texts are published are kept in the editorial office for no more than one year. After this period expires, the editorial office has the right to dispose of unclaimed copies at its own discretion.

 

Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.