
A. Fedorovsky (a.fedorovsk@imemo.ru),
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation;
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 36, Stremmyannyi Per., Moscow, 115054, Russian Federation
Abstract. The article reviews some consequences of the creation of missile and nuclear weapons in the DPRK and growing activity of Pyongyang diplomacy in Northeast Asia (NEA). It investigates the factors that contributed to the changing of domestic situation in North Korea and stimulated a dialogue with foreign countries. It also looks at the modification of Seoul’s policy towards Pyongyang, analyses new priorities of South Korean leadership in developing inter-Korean relations. Seoul tries to adopt new model of bilateral and international cooperation on the Korean Peninsula. Although the South Korean government intends to undertake notable steps to resume North-South exchanges, the political environment on the Korean peninsula and in NEA is not positive. The article examines inter alia the evolution of diplomatic activity of the United States, China, Russia and Japan on the Korean Peninsula and in NEA. Korean nuclear crisis is not local, but influences regional and global trends. New factors of growing regional diplomatic activity are characterized. In this context, the article finally explores the impact of globalism and nationalism on modern foreign policy in NEA, mainly that of the USA and China, because these two powers play the leading role in negotiations between the DPRK and outside world. It will be necessary for all regional powers to demonstrate their will to find out any kind of final decision which would take into account the interests of two Korean states as well as of all countries involved in negotiations. Meanwhile, a positive transition of the DPRK towards market-oriented and more open society is a decisive factor for prospects of improvement in security, political and economic situation on the Korean Peninsula and in NEA.
Keywords: NEA, China, USA, the Republic of Korea, DPRK, Japan, Russia, Korean crisis, foreign policy strategy, nationalism
REFERENCES
1. Mikheev V.V., Fedorovskii A.N., eds. Krizis i novaya povestka dnya dlya Koreiskogo poluostrova i regional’nykh derzhav [Crisis and New Political Agenda for the Korean Peninsula and the Regional Powers]. Moscow, IMEMO, 2018. 69 p.
2. DPR Korea: Needs and Priorities. March 2019. UN Humanitarian Country Team and partners. Available at: https://www.undp.org/content/dam/unct/dprk/docs/DPRK_NP_2019_Final.pdf (accessed 11.07.2019).
3. Zakharova L.V. Sovremennaya ekonomika KNDR i perspektivy eyo transformatsii [Modern Economy of the DPRK and the Prospects for its Transformation]. Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka, 2019, no. 2, pp. 91-103.
4. Trade Map. International Trade Statistics. Available at: https://www.trademap.org/tradestat (accessed 11.07.2019).
5. Moon Says “New Order” Being Formed on Korean Peninsula. The Korea Herald, 08.10.2018. Available at: http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=201810080005 54 (accessed 11.05.2019).
6. Moon Jae-in’s Policy on the Korean Peninsula. A Peninsula of Peace and Prosperity. Seoul, Ministry of Unification, 2018. 35 p.
7. Evans G. Australia and South Korea. Strengthening Middle-Power Bonds. Global Asia, 2018, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 74-80.
8. Snyder S. A. South Korea at the Crossroads. Autonomy and Alliance in Era of Rival Powers. New York, Columbia University Press, 2018. 355 p.
9. Davydov O.V. D. Trump i Kim Jong-un proveli vneplanovuyu vstrechu v Panmundzhome [D. Trump and Kim Jong-un held an Unscheduled Meeting in Panmunjom]. Available at: https://www.imemo.ru/index.php?page_id=502&id=5172 (accessed 11.07.2019).
10. Fedorovsky A. Krizis liderstva i stagnatsiya megaproektov v ATR: posledstviya dlya Rossii [Crisis of Regional Leadership and Stagnation of Mega-projects in Asia-Pacific: Consequences for Russia]. Kontury global’nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2019, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 6-25.
11. Shesgreen D. Trump Touts North Korea Economic Potential. Experts Say it’s an Investor’s ‘Nightmare’. USA Today, 25.02.2019. Available at: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2019/02/25/north-korea-economy-terrible-place-dobusiness-report-trump-kim-verisk/2928025002/ (accessed 11.07.2019).
12. Denisov V.I., Pyatachkova A.S. Budushchee Koreiskogo poluostrova: aktual’nye problemy i vozmozhnye resheniya [The Future of the Korean Peninsula: Topical Issues and Possible Solutions]. Kontury global’nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 2019, vol.12, no. 1, pp. 86-99.
13. Harris G. Trump has only sticks, no carrots. NYT, International Edition, 12.11.2018. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/09/sunday-review/trump-sanctions-iran-foreign-policy.html (accessed 11.07.2019).
14. Ock Hyun-ju. Democrat-controlled House could slow Trump’s North Korea diplomacy: experts. The Korea Herald, 07.11.2018. Available at: http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20181107000822 (accessed 11.07.2019).
15. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s statement at a joint news conference following talks with Foreign Minister of the Republic of Korea Kang Kyung-wha. Moscow, June 17, 2019. Available at: http://www.mid.ru/web/guest/meropriyatiya_s_uchastiem_ministra/-/asset_publisher/xK1BhB2bUjd3/content/id/3686129?p_p_id=101_INSTANCE_xK1BhB2bUjd3&_101_INSTANCE_xK1BhB2bUjd3_languageId=en_GB (accessed 11.07.2019).
16. Manning R.A. Techno-Nationalism vs. the 4th Industrial Revolution. Global Asia, 2019, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 14-29.
17. Kim Taehwan. The Resurgence of Nationalism and Its Implications for Korea. IFANS FOCUS, May 14, 2019, pp. 1-6.
18. Coase R., Ning Wang. Kak Kitai stal kapitalisticheskim [How China Became Capitalist]. Moscow, Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2016. 384 p.
19. Nguen Tkhi Fyong Khoa. Rost “myagkoi sily” Kitaya v svete “vykhoda vovne” [The Rise of China’s Soft Power as a Part of the ‘Go to the Outside’ Strategy]. “Myagkaya sila” v otnosheniyakh Kitaya s vneshnim mirom [Soft Power in China’s Relations with the Outside World]. Moscow, IDV RAS, 2015, pp. 184-206.
20. Rogozhina N.G., Rogozhin A.A. Ekonomicheskoe prisutstvie Kitaya v Yugo-Vostochnoi Azii – uslovie provedeniya politiki “myagkoi sily” [Economic Presence of China in Southeast Asia as a Condition for Promoting “Soft Power” Policy]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 40-49. DOI:10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-4-40-49
21. Titarenko M.L. Geopoliticheskoe znachenie regiona Dal’nego Vostoka. Rossiya, Kitai i drugie strany Azii [Geopolitical Significance of the Far East Region. Russia, China and other Asian Countries]. Moscow, Pamyatniki istoricheskoi mysli, 2008. 624 p.
22. Zheng Yongnian, Pan Rongfang. From Defensive to Aggressive Strategies: The Evolution of Economic Nationalism in China. Globalization and Economic Nationalism in Asia. Anthony P. D’Costa, ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 84-108.
23. Baranovsky V.G. Novyi miroporyadok: preodolenie starogo ili ego transformatsiya? [New International Order. Overcoming or Transforming the Existing Pattern?] Mirovaya ekonomika I mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 7-23. DOI:10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-5-7-23
Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX
No comments