Barriers in the EU-US Agricultural Trade within TTIP Agenda

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-2-36-45

V. Maltseva (,
Ural State University of Economics, 62, 8 Marta Str., 620144 Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation;
D. Chupina (,
Ural State University of Economics, 62, 8 Marta Str., 620144 Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation 


Potentially, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is a major driver for regulatory shift both in EU-US and global agri-food trade. The EU and the USA produce and export up to 20% of global agri-food products, however bilateral trade is impeded with numerous tariff and non-tariff barriers. Tariff barriers on agricultural transatlantic trade are relatively low at first sight: average MFN applied tariff on imports into the US doesn’t exceed 7% and 14% into the EU. These averages hide significant tariff peaks in sensitive products (especially, dairy and meat sector), various non-ad valorem duties, and limited number of duty-free tariff lines. NTMs are the key barriers to transatlantic trade, ad valorem averages of which are more than 50%, while the USA initiate more than 3 times more NTMs than the EU. NTMs mainly cover agricultural raw materials. However their impact on trade varies from completely restrictive for meat and “sand-in-the-wheels” effect for fruits and vegetables. Non-tariff regulation in the EU and the US is dominated by SPS and TBT measures which mainly arise from significant divergence of market regulation practices in both parties. Agricultural agenda of the TTIP (according to EU negotiating texts) goes beyond conventional RTA’s market access agenda and includes not only tariff elimination, but also commitments in TBT and SPS which aim to achieve coherence, and even domestic subsidies. Both the US and the EU have recent mega-RTA experience but neither the TPP nor the CETA were an agreement between dissimilar parties with equal bargaining power. Nevertheless, the EU demonstrated more flexibility while the US managed to lobby “American-style” approach to regulation of genetically modified products and food and beverages with geographical indication. Briefly, the TTIP is an ambitious project with potentially far-reaching regional and global impacts. Still, these spillovers are limited to the scope and depth of the current agenda, dramatic regulatory divergence and cooling of EU-US relations.

Acknowledgements. The research is supported by RFBR (project № 17-37-01004).  


trade barriers, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), European Union, United States, agricultural trade, tariff barriers, non-tariff barriers 


1. Kondrat’eva N.B. O sud’be Transatlanticheskogo torgovogo i investitsionnogo partnerstva ES–SShA [The fate of the negotiations on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership EU–USA]. Contemporary Europe, 2017, no. 1(73), pp. 138-142. DOI:10.15211/soveurope120173844

2. Poluektov A. B. Transatlanticheskoe torgovoe i investitsionnoe partnerstvo mezhdu ES i SShA: proobraz obnovlennoi VTO? [The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership between the EU and the USA: A prototype of a renovated WTO?]. Trade Policy, 2016, no. 2, pp. 22-40.

3. Portanskii A.P. Megaregional’nyi vyzov [Megaregional challenge]. Russia in Global Affairs, no. 1(14), 2016, pp. 126-136.

4. Berden K., Francois J. Quantifying Non-Tariff Measures for TTIP. Paper no. 12 in the CEPS-CTR project “TTIP in the Balance” and CEPS Special Report, no. 116, CEPS, 2015. 30 p.

5. Beckman J., Arita S., Mitchell L., Burfisher M. Agriculture in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Tariffs, Tariff-Rate Quotas, and Non-Tariff Measures. Economic Research Report Number 198. Washington, USDA, 2015. 48 p.

6. Bureau J.-C., Felbermayr G., Fouré J. Risks and opportunities for the EU agri-food sector in a possible EU-US trade agreement. CEPII Research Report. Brussels, European Parliament’s Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, 2014. 148 p.

7. Josling T., Tangermann S. Agriculture, Food and the TTIP: Possibilities and Pitfalls. Paper no. 1 in the CEPS-CTR project “TTIP in the Balance” and CEPS Special Report, no. 99. CEPS, 2014. 30 p.

8. International Trade Center (ITC) Trade Map. Available at: (accessed 20.05.2018).

9. Josling T., Tangermann S. Transatlantic Food and Agricultural Trade Policy: 50 Years of Conflict and Convergence. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2015. 320 p.

10. WTO Tariff Download Facility. Available at: (accessed 27.04.2018).

11. World Tariff Profiles. Available at: (accessed 27.04.2018).

12. Non-Tariff Measures in EU-US Trade and Investment – An Economic Analysis. Final Report of a Study for the European Commission. Rotterdam, ECORUS, 2009. 197 p.

13. Aksoy M.A., Beghin J.C. Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries. Washington, World Bank, 2005. 329 p.

14. WTO I-TIP Goods. Available at: (accessed 27.05.2018)

15. Market Access Database. European Commission. Available at: (accessed 09.06.2018)

16. Deardorff A., Stern R. Measurement of Non-Tariff Barriers. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 179. Paris, OECD Publishing, 1997. 117 p.

17. Mal’tseva V.A. Ochagovyi protektsionizm i mirazhi liberalizatsii v mezhdunarodnoi torgovle sel’skokhozyaistvennoi produktsiei [Fragmented protectionism and liberalization illusion in international agricultural trade]. Izvestia Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2017, no. 4(72), pp. 88-97.

18. Evaluation of NTMs elimination economic effects in EAEU. Saint-Peterburg, EDB Centre for Integration Studies, 2015. 72 p. (In Russ.)

19. T-TIP Issue-by-Issue Information Center. Available at: (accessed 29.04.2018).

20. EU Negotiating Texts in TTIP. Available at: (accessed 11.11.2017).

21. Alemanno A. What the TTIP Leaks Mean for the On-Going Negotiations and Future Agreement? Time to Overcome TTIP’s Many Informational Asymmetries. Research Paper No. LAW‑2016-1158, 2016. 10 p.

22. Puccio L. EU-US Negotiations on TTIP. A Survey of Current Issues. Brussels, European Parliamentary Research Service, 2015. 32 p.

23. Fontagné L., Gourdon J., Jean S. Transatlantic Trade: Whither Partnership, Which Economic Consequences? CEPII Policy Brief, no. 1, 2013. 12 p.

24. EU Textual Proposal on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) in TTIP. Available at: (accessed 11.11.2017).

25. EU Proposal to Include an Article on Anti-Microbial Resistance within the SPS Chapter of TTIP. Available at: (accessed 11.11.2017).

26. Kondrat’eva N.B. Transatlanticheskoe partnerstvo ES–SShA: perspektivy [The US–EU Transatlantic Partnership: prospects]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2017, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 5-13. DOI:10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-8-5-13

27. Agriculture and Geographical Indications (GIs) in TTIP. A Guide to the EU’s Proposal. Brussels, European Commission, 2016. Available at: (accessed 11.11.2017).

28. EU Leads the Way by Eliminating Export Subsidies Ahead of WTO Conference in Buenos Aires. Available at: (accessed 11.01.2018).

29. Mal’tseva V.A., Chupina D.A. Regional’nye i megaregional’nye torgovye soglasheniya: torgovlya sel’skokhozyaistvennoi produktsiei v Transtikhookeanskom partnerstve [Regional and mega-regional trade agreements: agricultural trade in the Trans-Pacific Partnership]. International Organizations Research Journal, 2017, no. 1(12), pp. 43-65. DOI:10.17323/1996-7845-2017-01-43

30. Agriculture in the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). European Parliament, 2016. Available at: (accessed 09.06.2018)

31. Frankl S. Geographical Indications and Mega-Regional Trade Agreements and Negotiations. Geographical Indication at the Crossroads of Trade, Development, and Culture. Focus on Asia-Pacific. Calboli I., Ng-Loy W.L., eds. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017. 550 p. DOI:

32. FoodWatch. Available at: (accessed 09.06.2018). 

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Maltseva V., Chupina D. Barriers in the EU-US Agricultural Trade within TTIP Agenda . Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, vol. 63, No 2, pp. 36-45.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

Current Issue
2021, vol. 65, No. 4

Topical Themes of the Issue:

  •  Coronacrisis in the EU: a Knock-Down or a Jump-Off for Integration? 
  •  Latin America in the South-South Cooperation Against the Background of Globalization Controversies 
  •  Reforming the Saudi Economy: Results and Perspectives 
  •  Non-Western Theories of Development in the Global Capitalism Era
  •  About an Attempt to Create a Theory of International Relations in IMEMO in the 1970s
View This Issue (2021, vol. 65, No. 4)
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications.The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!
We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic versions of the IV issue of 2020 and I issue of 2021 of French magazine Politique étrangère are now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media.

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.


"World Eсonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.


The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library or URL:

In journal
2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial