I. Tsapenko (email@example.com),
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
Abstract. Multiple changes in the development of migration processes, in their socio-economic and political context in the receiving societies require in return revising the concept of integration and reforming practices of integration policy. The latter is being transformed in three main areas. First, the decentralization of integration management is taking place, primarily by strengthening of authority, activity and responsibility of local governments. Secondly, multiactor mainstreaming is being formed. There is a shift away from targeted measures directed to migrants and their descendants towards generic social policies aimed at whole of society. Nevertheless, inclusive long-term needs-based and area-based practices are implicitly centered on migrants and ethnic minorities and combined with direct temporary initiatives affecting them. The pool of stakeholders of integration policy is expanding to involve whole of government, as well as private sector and civil society in the development and implementation of this policy. Thirdly, the urban management system is being restructured on the basis of intercultural principles. At the local level, intercultural practices are spreading in different areas of society. These changes have already led to some positive results. However, progress is not yet solid and has not been achieved in all areas. There are risks of negative effects of reforms. The complexities of multi-level interactive governance of integration and the limitation of intercultural policies by the local framework do not allow to assert the change of state-centric models of assimilationism and multiculturalism to a new paradigm of cultural differences organization on a national scale. At the moment, it is rather a set of social experiments in the field of mainstreaming and interculturalism dispersed in cities. However, in the long term, the changes that are taking place may lead to a formation of a new – more efficient, inclusive and cohesive – version of state-level diversity management.
Keywords: migration, diversity, integration, integration policies, multi-level governance, decentralization, mainstreaming, interculturalism
1. Action Plan on the Integration of Third Country Nationals. COM(2016) 377 final. Brussels, European Commission, 07.06.2016. 21 ð.
2. Scholten P., Penninx R. The Multilevel Governance of Migration and Integration. Integration Processes and Policies in Europe. B. Garcés-Mascareñas, R. Penninx, eds. Cham etc., Springer, 2016, pð. 91-108.
3. Indicators of Immigrant Integration 2015: Settling In. Paris, OECD, 2015. 344 p.
4. Indicators of Immigrant Integration 2018: Settling In. Paris, OECD, 2018. 306 p.
5. International Migration Outlook: 2018 Edition. Paris, OECD, 2018. 407 p.
6. Is This Humanitarian Migration Crisis Different? OECD Migration Policy Debates, 2015, no. 7. 15 p.
7. UN. Trends in International Migrant Stock: The 2017 Revision. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/data/estimates2/docs/MigrationStockDocumentation_2017.pdf (accessed 10.03.2010).
8. Pew Research Center. Europe’s Growing Muslim Population. 2017. Available at: http://www.pewforum.org/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population (accessed 10.03.2010).
9. Multi-Level Governance, Decentralisation, Subnational Finance and Investment. 2017–2018. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/MLG-Decentralisation-Brochure.pdf (accessed 10.03.2010).
10. UN. Migrants and Cities: A Public Administration Perspective on Local Governance and Service Delivery. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/events/pdf/expert/27/papers/VI/paper-Blind-final.pdf (accessed 10.03.2010).
11. Semenenko I.S. Gorizonty otvetstvennogo razvitiya: ot nauchnogo diskursa k politicheskomu upravleniyu [Horizons of Responsible Development: from Scientific Discourse to Political Governance]. Polis. Political Studies, 2019, no. 3, pp. 7-26. DOI:10.17976/jpps/2019.03.02
12. Benton M., Ahad A. Breaking New Ground: Ten Ideas to Revamp Integration Policy in Europe. Brussels, MPI, 2019. 24 p.
13. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 26.10.2012.
14. Working Together for Local Integration of Migrants and Refugees. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2018. 190 ð.
15. Gebhardt D. Re-thinking Urban Citizenship for Immigrants from a Policy Perspective: the Case of Barcelona. Citizenship Studies, 2016, vol. 20, no. 6–7, pp. 846-866.
16. Eurofound. Challenges of Policy Coordination for Third-country Nationals. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 2015. 91 p.
17. Special Eurobarometer, 2018, no. 469. Tables of Results. 164 p.
18. Benton M., McCarthy H., Collett E. Into the Mainstream: Rethinking Public Services for Diverse and Mobile Populations. Brussels, MPI, 2015. 41 p.
19. Scholten P., Collett E., Petrovic M. Mainstreaming Migrant Integration? A Critical Analysis of a New Trend in Integration Governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2017, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 283-302.
20. Collett E., Petrovic M. The Future of Immigrant Integration in Europe: Mainstreaming Approaches for Inclusion. Brussels, MPI, 2014. 36 p.
21. Boucher F., Maclure J. Moving the Debate Forward: Interculturalism’s Contribution to Multiculturalism. Comparative Migration Studies, 2018, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1-10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0078-2
22. Integratsiya inokul’turnykh migrantov: perspektivy interkul’turalizma [Integration of Migrants with Different Cultural Background: Prospects of Interculturalism]. Tsapenko I., Grishin I., eds. Moscow, IMEMO, 2018. 233 p.
23. White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue: “Living Together As Equals in Dignity”. Strasbourg, Council of Europe, 2008. 61 p.
24. Intercultural Cities: Towards a Model for Intercultural Integration. Wood P., ed. Strasbourg, Council of Europe, 2009. 124 p.
25. Final Report Evaluation of the Intercultural Cities Programme. Council of Europe, 2015:64. Available at: http://www.coe.int/en/web/interculturalcities/results-and-impact (accessed 15.03.2019).
26. Joki A.-L., Wolffhardt A. How the Intercultural Integration Approach Leads to a Better Quality of Life in Diverse Cities. (2018) Available at: https://rm.coe.int/intercultural-to-the-core-how-the-intercultural-cities-index-can-be-be/168076631b (accessed 13.10.2018).
Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX