
V. Malakhov (malakhov-vs@ranepa.ru),
RANEPA, 82/1, Vernadskogo Prosp., Moscow, 119571, Russian Federation
Abstract. The paper examines the phenomenon of global migration governance in its theoretical, institutional and political aspects. The author claims that the formula ‘global governance’ with regard to migration has sense only if it is applied to a set of administrative practices in various regimes of international mobility. This is the so-called “multi-level governance”, in which the managerial institutions of the subnational, national, macroregional and supranational levels coexist. As for the global migration governance in terms of the institutionalized process of supranational management of international migration, it is rather wishful thinking, represented by international bureaucracy, on the one hand, and civil society activists, on the other. As long as nation states remain the main actors in world politics, the appeal to supranational migration management will remain in the sphere of rhetoric. The contradictions between the interests of the states are too serious for them to pass on the transfer of competences in managing the sphere of migration to a supranational level.
Keywords: migration, global governance, international regime, institutes, Global Compact on Migration
REFERENCES
1. Global Migration Compact: Complete Text (In Russ.) Available at: https://rus.err.ee/877566/globalnyj-dogovor-oon-o-migracii-polnyj-tekst (accessed 23.12.2018).
2. Our Global Neighborhood. The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. 1995. Available at: http://www.gdrc.org/u-gov/global-neighbourhood/ (accessed 23.12.2018).
3. Ghosh B., ed. Managing Migration: Time for a New International Regime? Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001. 272 p.
4. Krasner St.D., ed. International Regimes. Ithaca, London, Cornel University Press, 1983. 372 p.
5. Betts A. Introduction: Global Migration Governance. Betts A. ed. Global Migration Governance. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 1-34.
6. Rosenau J. Governance in the 21st Century. Global Governance, 1995, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13-43.
7. Keohane R., Ostrom E. eds. Local Commons and Global Interdependence: Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains. London, Sage Publications, 1995. Available at: http://sk.sagepub.com/books/local-commons-and-global-interdependence (accessed 23.12.2018).
8. Olson M. Logika kollektivnykh deistvii: obshchestvennye tovary i teoriya grupp [The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups], Moscow, Economic initiative fund. 1995. 165 p.
9. Becker G. The Challenge of Immigration – A Radical Solution. London, The Institute of Economic Affairs, 2011. Available at: http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/IEA%20Challenge%20of%20Immigration%20web.pdf (accessed 23.12.2018).
10. Cox R. W. Labour and Hegemony. International Organization, 1977, vol. 31, iss. 3, pp. 385-424.
11. Cox R. W. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millenium Journal of International Studies, 1981, vol. 10, no. 2, pp.126-155.
12. Jessop R.D. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2002. 330 p.
13. Purcell M. Hegemony and Difference in Political Movements: Articulating Networks of Equivalence. New Political Science, 2009, no. 31 (3), pp. 291-317.
14. Geiger M., Pécoud A., eds. Disciplining the Transnational Mobility of People. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 259 p.
15. Schierup C.-U., Munk R. et al., eds., Migration, Precarity, and Global Governance: Challenges and Opportunities for Labour. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015. 302 p.
16. Prasad V. The Darker Nations. New York, The New Press, 2008. 384 p.
17. Standing G. The Precariat: the New Dangerous Class. London, Bloomsbury Academic, 2011. 198 p.
18. Kalm S., Uhlin A. Civil Society and the Governance of Development. Opposing Global Institutions. Baignstoke, Palgrave MacMillan, 2015. 199 p.
19. Piper N., Rother S. Let’s Argue about Migration: Advancing a Right(S) Discourse via Communicative Opportunities. Third World Quarterly, 2012, no. 33 (9), pp. 1735-1750.
20. Schierup C.-U., Alund A., Likic-Brboric B. Migration, Precarisation and Democratic Deficit in Global Governance. International Migration, 2015, no. 53 (3), pp. 50-63.
21. Rother S. Angry Birds of Passage – Migrant Right Networks and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to Global Migration Discourses. Globalizations, 2018, no. 15 (6), pp. 854-869.
22. Kozlowski R. Global Mobility Regimes. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 282 p.
23. Kozer K. Introduction: International Migration and Global Governance. International Migration, 2010, vol. 16, no. 3 (July–September), pp. 301-315.
24. Stephenson P. Twenty Years of Multi-Level Governance: Where Does It Come From? What Is It? Where Is It Going? Journal of European Public Policy, 2013, no. 20 (6), pp. 817-837.
25. Kurz R., Lavenex S., Panizzon M., eds. Multilayered Migration Governance: the Promise of Partnership. London, New York, Routledge, 2011. 324 p.
26. Lacroix T., Desille A., eds. International Migrations and Local Governance: a Global Perspective. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 243 p.
27. Social Platform. Available at: http://www.socialplatform.org/what-we-do/decriminalising-solidarity (accessed 09.02.2019).
28. Statement of the Russian Federation on the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. Marrakesh, December 11, 2018 Available at: http://www.mid.ru/en_GB/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/3440694 (accessed 23.12.2018).
Alekseenkova E. Chem plox global`ny`j dogovor o migracii. [What is wrong with the migration treaty]. Rossiiskii sovet po mezdunarodnim delam. Available at: http://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/columns/global-governance/chem-plokh-globalnyy-dogovor-o-migratsii/?sphrase_id=25464940 (accessed 09.02.2019).
Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX
No comments