Dynamics of International Alliances in an Unbalanced World Structure

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-1-34-48

I. Istomin (iaistomin@gmail.com), 
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Russian Federation (MGIMO University), Vernadskogo Prosp., 76, Moscow 119454, Russian Federation;
A. Baikov (a.baykov@inno.mgimo.ru), 
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Russian Federation (MGIMO University), Vernadskogo Prosp., 76, Moscow 119454, Russian Federation; 
“International Trends”, Vernadskogo Prosp., 76, Moscow 119454, Russian Federation 


Interstate military alliances have long been in the lens of theoretical and empirical research of international relations scholars. The classical view of alliances treated them as a tool for balancing amongst roughly equal players in a multi-polar anarchical environment. Meanwhile, the practice of international relations at least from the second half of the 20th century testifies to the rise of asymmetrical alliances as a new major type of military-political institutions. In such formations, a hegemon, characterized by an overwhelming preponderance in terms of its aggregate material (primarily military) capability cooperates with one or several largely inferior players from the standpoint of their comprehensive power. Traditional balancing theories are not in a position to satisfactorily account for the motivation and dynamics of the parties’ behavior in alliances of this type. In the present study, based on an analysis of voting data in the UN GA and on the record of supporting U.S. actions against both Iraq in 2003 and ISIS in 2014–2017, the authors offer their theoretical explanation of the logic of participants’ conduct in asymmetric alliances. They hypothesize and evidence that in exchange for military security guarantees, small and middle countries provide legitimization of unpopular foreign policy actions of the hegemon. The exchange of different types of goods represent the second type of asymmetry in the studied institutions. There is also a third dimension to it: whereas commitments of major powers are formally recognized in alliance establishing agreements, political obligations of its weaker partners remain mostly informal. However, this lack of legal expression of the allegiance to the hegemon could, the authors argue, turn out in the latter’s own interests, as it increases the legitimating effect of support from the allies. In addition, a side effect of building a global client network of junior partners is the cementation of hierarchic structures under the patronage of the United States. The latter is an attempt by Washington to limit and ultimately transcend both the anarchic nature of the international environment and the ensuing low predictability of the global security environment.


The United States, military-political alliances, the „axis and spokes“ system, the war in Iraq, the fight against ISIS, international hierarchies 


1. Waltz K.N. Theory of international politics. Long Grove, Illinois, Waveland Press, 1979. 251 p.

2. Morrow J.D. Arms versus Allies: Trade-offs in the Search for Security. International Organization, 1993, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 207-233.

3. Parent J. M., Rosato S. Balancing in Neorealism. International Security, 2015, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 51-86. DOI:10.1162/ ISEC_a_00216

4. Leeds B.A., Long A. G., Mitchell S. M.L. Reevaluating alliance reliability: Specific threats, specific promises. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2000, vol. 44, vol. 5, pp. 686-699. DOI:10.1177/0022002700044005006

5. Christensen T. J., Snyder J. Chain gangs and passed bucks: Predicting alliance patterns in multipolarity. International Organization, 1990, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 137-168. DOI:10.1017/S0020818300035232

6. Womack B. Asymmetry and International Relationships. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2016. 244 p.

7. Beckley M. The myth of entangling alliances: Reassessing the security risks of US defense pacts. International Security, 2015, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 7-48. DOI:10.1162/ISEC_a_00197

8. Walt S. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca. London, Cornell University Press, 1987. 321 p.

9. Carr E. Twenty years’ crisis 1919–1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. London, Macmillan, 1940. 247 p.

10. Morghentau H. Politics among Nations; the Struggle for Power Peace. New York, Higher Education, 1948. 489 p.

11. Axelrod R. Effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1980, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3-25. DOI:10.1177/002200278002400101

12. Gibler D.M. The costs of reneging: Reputation and alliance formation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2008, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 426-454.

13. Crescenzi M.J.C., Kathman, J.D., Kleinberg, K.B., Wood R.M. Reliability, reputation, and alliance formation. International Studies Quarterly, 2012, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 259-274. DOI:10.1111/j.1468–2478.2011.00711

14. Smith A. Alliance formation and war. International Studies Quarterly, 1995, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 405-425. DOI:10.2307/2600800

15. Bas M., Schub R. Mutual Optimism as a Cause of Conflict: Secret Alliances and Conflict Onset. International Studies Quarterly, 2016, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 552-564. DOI:10.1093/isq/sqw002

16. Mearsheimer J.J. Conventional Deterrence. Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press, 2017. 296 p.

17. Layne Ch. The peace of illusions: American grand strategy from 1940 to the present. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, November 2007. 304 p.

18. Posen B. R. Restraint: A new foundation for US grand strategy. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2015. 256 p.

19. Kim T. Why alliances entangle but seldom entrap states. Security Studies, 2011, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 350-377. DOI:10.1080/09636412.2011.599201

20. Narang N., Mehta R.N. The unforeseen consequences of extended deterrence: Moral hazard in a nuclear client state. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2017. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022002717729025 (accessed 03.06.2018).

21. Morrow J. D. Alliances and asymmetry: An alternative to the capability aggregation model of alliances. American Journal of Political Science, 1991, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 904-933. DOI:10.2307/2111499

22. Troitskii M.A. Kontseptsiya “programmiruyushchego liderstva” v evroatlanticheskoi strategii SShA [Concept of Programming Leadership in the Euro-Atlantic Strategy of the USA]. Pro et Contra, 2002, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 86-103.

23. Bennett D.S. Testing alternative models of alliance duration, 1816–1984. American Journal of Political Science, 1997, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 846-878. DOI:10.2307/2111677

24. Istomin I.A., Vodop’yanov K.G. Transformatsiya amerikano-yaponskogo soyuza [Transformation for the American-Japanese Alliance]. International Trends, 2016, no. 1(14), pp. 121-142. DOI:10.17994/IT.2016.

25. Lake D.A. Hierarchy in international relations. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2009. 232 p.

26. Cha V.D. Powerplay: The Origins of the American Alliance System in Asia. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2016. 352 p.

27. David S. R. Explaining third world alignment. World Politics, 1991, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 233-256. DOI: 10.2307/2010472

28. Mastanduno M. System maker and privilege taker. World Politics, 2009, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 121-154.

29. Paul T.V., Larson D.W., Wohlforth W.C., eds. Status in World Politics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014. 324 p.

30. Renshon J. Fighting for Status: Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2017. 328 p.

31. Ward S. Status and the Challenge of Rising Powers. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2017. 274 p.

32. March J.G., Olsen J.P. The logic of appropriateness. The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Goodin R. E., Tilly Ch., eds. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 478-497.

33. Krasner S. D. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999. 280 p.

34. Olson M., Zeckhauser R. An economic theory of alliances. The review of economics and statistics, 1966, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 266-279. DOI:10.2307/1927082

35. Leeds B. A. Alliance reliability in times of war: Explaining state decisions to violate treaties. International Organization, 2003, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 801-827. DOI:10.1017/S0020818303574057

36. Brooks S., Wohlforth W. America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st Century. Oxford, Oxford University Press, September 2016. 288 p.

37. Istomin I.A. “Dilemma al’yansov” v razvitii voenno-politicheskikh soyuzov SShA [“Alliance Dilemma in the Development of Military and Political Alliances of the USA]. Situatsionnye analiz. Vyp. 5: mezhdunarodnye instituty v sovremennoi mirovoi politike [Situational Analysis. Issue 5: International Institutions in the Current World Politics]. Shakleina T. A., ed. Moscow, MGIMO-University, 2017. pp. 215-265.

38. Newnham R. “Coalition of the bribed and bullied?” US economic linkage and the Iraq War coalition. International Studies Perspectives, 2008, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 183-200. 

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Istomin I., Baykov A. Dynamics of International Alliances in an Unbalanced World Structure. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, vol. 63, No 1, pp. 34-48. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-1-34-48

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

Current Issue
2020, vol. 64, No. 9

Topical Themes of the Issue:

  • World Energy after the Pandemic
  • Developing Countries in the Political Economy of the Post-Coronavirus World
  • The Prospects for Settlement of North Korean Nuclear Problem in View of the Presidential Elections in the USA 
  • EU Single Financial Market: Illusion or Reality?
  • Consequences of the Civil War in Syria and Ways of Overcoming Them
View This Issue (2020, vol. 64, No. 9)
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications. Currently, the releases of 2015–2018 are available for free. The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic version of the 4-nd issue of 2019 of French magazine Politique étrangère is now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media (e-mailing is not possible because of technical reasons).


In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!

We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!


"World Eсonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.


The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library eLIBRARY.ru or URL: https://press.gaugn.ru/.

In journal
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial