U.S.-Russia Relations in the Arctic: Cooperation or Competition?

2293
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-103-111

V. Konyshev (konyshev06@mail.ru), 
St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya Nab., St. Petersburg 199034, Russian Federation.
A. Sergunin (sergunin60@mail.ru), 
St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya Nab., St. Petersburg 199034, Russian Federation 

Acknowledgements. The article was supported by grants of the Russian Science Foundation (Project no. 16-18-10315) and Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (Project no. 17/2200). 


Abstract. The paper examines the evolution of the U.S. national interests in the Arctic, its economic and military strategies in the High North, as well as assesses the U.S.-Russia relations in the region. The Trump administration did not produce any official Arctic doctrine or fresh ideas regarding its High North strategies. In terms of economic strategies, the Trump administration lifted Obama’s ban on the development of oil and gas deposits in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve and Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as well as offshore fields in the Chukchee and Beaufort seas. Trump also decided to withdraw from the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change. This decision undermined one of the most important pillars of Obama’s Arctic strategies. The U.S. military strategy in the Far North aims, on the one hand, to contain Russia with the help of strategic and conventional arms and, on the other hand, to protect American economic interests and implement freedom of navigation principle in the region. Similar to other Arctic powers, the United States modernizes its nuclear and conventional forces trying to make them more compact, better equipped and trained. As far as the international aspects of the U.S. Arctic strategy are concerned, the Trump administration simply continued policies launched by Barak Obama, although there was some decrease in Washington’s interest for multilateral diplomacy in this region, including international institutions. As for the U.S.-Russia relations in the Arctic, they still remain very controversial and include both elements of competition and cooperation. There is a lack of trust between Moscow and Washington in the regional security sphere. The Trump administration continues Obama’s sanction policies with regard to Russia, including the oil and gas industry sector. However, the USA may be interested in the Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) shipments from the Russian Arctic (especially in winter time). Moreover, both countries favor coast guard cooperation to prevent poaching and increase the safety of navigation in the Bering Sea and Strait. The U.S. and Russia are willing to enhance Arctic research and education cooperation. Some arms control/ confidence- and security-building measures can be suggested in bilateral and multilateral formats. 

Keywords: USA, Russia, Arctic, D. Trump, cooperation, competition 


REFERENCES

1. National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD-66) and Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD-25). January 9, 2009. Available at: http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-66.htm (accessed 10.03.2018).

2. National Strategy for the Arctic Region. May 10, 2013. Washington, GPO, 2013. Available at: https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/us-national-strategy-for-arctic-region/ (accessed 10.03.2018).

3. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. December 2017. Washington, The White House, 2017. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

4. O’Rourke R. Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress. January 4, 2018. Washington, Congressional Research Service, 2018. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41153.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

5. Executive Order 13795, “Implementing an America-First Offshore Energy Strategy,” April 28, 2017. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-05-03/pdf/2017-09087.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

6. Expert: “Rosneft” and Exxon Mobil Will Be Able to Extract up to 90 Billion Barrels of Oil and Gas in the Arctic (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.arctic-info.ru/news/28-04-2012/ekspert---rosneft_--i-exxon-mobil-smogyt-dobivat_-v-arktike-do-90-mlrd--barrelei-nefti-i-gaza/ (accessed 10.03.2018).

7. ConocoPhillips готова увеличить инвестиции в Ардалинское месторождение в НАО. [ConocoPhillips Is Ready to Increase Investment in the Ardalinsky Deposit in the NAO (In Russ.)] Available at: http://www.arctic-info.ru/news/25-05-2012/-conocophillips-gotova-yvelicit_-investicii-v-ardalinskoe-mestorojdenie-v-nao/ (accessed 10.03.2018).

8. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A. Remilitarizatsiya Arktiki i bezopasnost’ Rossii [Arctic’s Remilitarization and Russia’s Security]. Natsional’naya bezopasnost’, 2011, no. 3, pp. 55-67.javascript:void(0);/*1538230637771*/

9. Report to Congress on Strategy to Protect United States National Security Interests in the Arctic Region. OUSD (Policy). December 2016. Washington, DC, Department of Defense, 2016. Available at: https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2016-Arctic-Strategy-UNCLAS-cleared-for-release.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

10. Partnership Interoperability Initiative. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/ic/natohq/topics_132726.htm (accessed 10.03.2018).

11. Report on Arctic Policy. International Security Advisory Board. September 21, 2016. Available at: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/262585.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

12. Pezard S., Tingstad A., Van Abel K., Stephenson S. Maintaining Arctic Cooperation with Russia. Santa Monica, RAND, 2017. Available at: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1700/RR1731/RAND_RR1731.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

13. Forsyth M. Why Alaska and the Arctic are Critical to the National Security of the United States. Military Review. Available at: https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-528616528/why-alaska-and-the-arctic-are-critical-to-the-national (accessed 12.03.2018).

14. Report to Congress on Resourcing the Arctic strategy. OUSD (Policy). June 2016. Washington, DC, Department of Defense, 2016. Available at: https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/Report_to_Congress_on_Resourcing_the_Arctic_Strategy.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

15. Martinson E. Defense Bill Passes US Senate with Provisions for Icebreakers, Alaska Missile Defense. Available at: https://www.arctictoday.com/defense-bill-passes-us-senate-with-provisions-for-icebreakers-alaska-missile-defense/ (accessed 10.03.2018).

16. Woolf A. U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues. Washington, DC, Congressional Research Service, March 6, 2018. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RL33640.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

17. Arctic Air Base Gets $40 Million Upgrade in Face of Increasing Missile Threats. CBS News, May 30, 2017. Available at: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/inside-thule-air-base-arctic-jeff-glor/ (accessed 10.03.2018).

18. Here’s How Norway’s New US-Made Radar Aimed at Russia Will Look. Available at: https://sputniknews.com/ military/201604151038057832-norway-missile-shield-radar/ (accessed 10.03.2018).

19. Myasnikov E. Kontrsilovoi potentsial vysokotochnogo oruzhiya [Counter-Potential of the High Precision Weapons]. Yadernoe rasprostranenie: novye tekhnologii, vooruzheniya i dogovory [Nuclear Proliferation: New Technologies, Weapons and Agreements]. Arbatov A., Dvorkin V., eds. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2009, pp. 105-128.

20. Barnes J. NATO Plans to Create Two New Commands Amid Russia Tensions. The Wall Street Journal, October 24, 2017. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/nato-plans-to-create-two-new-commands-amid-russia-tensions-1508837829 (accessed 10.03.2018).

21. НАТО проведет масштабные учения у границ России. [NATO Will Organize Large-Scale Exercises Nearby Russia’s Borders (In Russ.)] Available at: https://ria.ru/world/20180307/1515978504.html (accessed 10.03.2018).

22. Coffey L., Kochis D. NATO Summit 2016: Time for an Arctic Strategy. Issue Brief, no. 4578, June 16, 2016. Available at: https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/report/nato-summit-2016-time-arctic-strategy (accessed 10.03.2018). 


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Konyshev V., Sergunin A. U.S.-Russia Relations in the Arctic: Cooperation or Competition?. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 2018, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 103-111. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-103-111



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 5
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Are There Any Ways to Break Through the Korean Nuclear Impasse?
  • Contemporary U.S. Taiwan Policy: Balancing on the Edge
  • The Gulf Monarchies’ Vision of the Global Order Transformations and the Russian Place in It
  • At Post-Soviet Space
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.