U.S.-Russia Relations in the Arctic: Cooperation or Competition?

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-103-111

V. Konyshev (konyshev06@mail.ru), 
St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya Nab., St. Petersburg 199034, Russian Federation.
A. Sergunin (sergunin60@mail.ru), 
St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya Nab., St. Petersburg 199034, Russian Federation 


The paper examines the evolution of the U.S. national interests in the Arctic, its economic and military strategies in the High North, as well as assesses the U.S.-Russia relations in the region. The Trump administration did not produce any official Arctic doctrine or fresh ideas regarding its High North strategies. In terms of economic strategies, the Trump administration lifted Obama’s ban on the development of oil and gas deposits in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve and Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as well as offshore fields in the Chukchee and Beaufort seas. Trump also decided to withdraw from the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change. This decision undermined one of the most important pillars of Obama’s Arctic strategies. The U.S. military strategy in the Far North aims, on the one hand, to contain Russia with the help of strategic and conventional arms and, on the other hand, to protect American economic interests and implement freedom of navigation principle in the region. Similar to other Arctic powers, the United States modernizes its nuclear and conventional forces trying to make them more compact, better equipped and trained. As far as the international aspects of the U.S. Arctic strategy are concerned, the Trump administration simply continued policies launched by Barak Obama, although there was some decrease in Washington’s interest for multilateral diplomacy in this region, including international institutions. As for the U.S.-Russia relations in the Arctic, they still remain very controversial and include both elements of competition and cooperation. There is a lack of trust between Moscow and Washington in the regional security sphere. The Trump administration continues Obama’s sanction policies with regard to Russia, including the oil and gas industry sector. However, the USA may be interested in the Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) shipments from the Russian Arctic (especially in winter time). Moreover, both countries favor coast guard cooperation to prevent poaching and increase the safety of navigation in the Bering Sea and Strait. The U.S. and Russia are willing to enhance Arctic research and education cooperation. Some arms control/ confidence- and security-building measures can be suggested in bilateral and multilateral formats. 


USA, Russia, Arctic, D. Trump, cooperation, competition 


1. National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD-66) and Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD-25). January 9, 2009. Available at: http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/nspd-66.htm (accessed 10.03.2018).

2. National Strategy for the Arctic Region. May 10, 2013. Washington, GPO, 2013. Available at: https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/us-national-strategy-for-arctic-region/ (accessed 10.03.2018).

3. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. December 2017. Washington, The White House, 2017. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

4. O’Rourke R. Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress. January 4, 2018. Washington, Congressional Research Service, 2018. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41153.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

5. Executive Order 13795, “Implementing an America-First Offshore Energy Strategy,” April 28, 2017. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-05-03/pdf/2017-09087.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

6. Expert: “Rosneft” and Exxon Mobil Will Be Able to Extract up to 90 Billion Barrels of Oil and Gas in the Arctic (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.arctic-info.ru/news/28-04-2012/ekspert---rosneft_--i-exxon-mobil-smogyt-dobivat_-v-arktike-do-90-mlrd--barrelei-nefti-i-gaza/ (accessed 10.03.2018).

7. ConocoPhillips готова увеличить инвестиции в Ардалинское месторождение в НАО. [ConocoPhillips Is Ready to Increase Investment in the Ardalinsky Deposit in the NAO (In Russ.)] Available at: http://www.arctic-info.ru/news/25-05-2012/-conocophillips-gotova-yvelicit_-investicii-v-ardalinskoe-mestorojdenie-v-nao/ (accessed 10.03.2018).

8. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A. Remilitarizatsiya Arktiki i bezopasnost’ Rossii [Arctic’s Remilitarization and Russia’s Security]. Natsional’naya bezopasnost’, 2011, no. 3, pp. 55-67.javascript:void(0);/*1538230637771*/

9. Report to Congress on Strategy to Protect United States National Security Interests in the Arctic Region. OUSD (Policy). December 2016. Washington, DC, Department of Defense, 2016. Available at: https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2016-Arctic-Strategy-UNCLAS-cleared-for-release.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

10. Partnership Interoperability Initiative. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/ic/natohq/topics_132726.htm (accessed 10.03.2018).

11. Report on Arctic Policy. International Security Advisory Board. September 21, 2016. Available at: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/262585.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

12. Pezard S., Tingstad A., Van Abel K., Stephenson S. Maintaining Arctic Cooperation with Russia. Santa Monica, RAND, 2017. Available at: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1700/RR1731/RAND_RR1731.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

13. Forsyth M. Why Alaska and the Arctic are Critical to the National Security of the United States. Military Review. Available at: https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-528616528/why-alaska-and-the-arctic-are-critical-to-the-national (accessed 12.03.2018).

14. Report to Congress on Resourcing the Arctic strategy. OUSD (Policy). June 2016. Washington, DC, Department of Defense, 2016. Available at: https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/Report_to_Congress_on_Resourcing_the_Arctic_Strategy.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

15. Martinson E. Defense Bill Passes US Senate with Provisions for Icebreakers, Alaska Missile Defense. Available at: https://www.arctictoday.com/defense-bill-passes-us-senate-with-provisions-for-icebreakers-alaska-missile-defense/ (accessed 10.03.2018).

16. Woolf A. U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues. Washington, DC, Congressional Research Service, March 6, 2018. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RL33640.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

17. Arctic Air Base Gets $40 Million Upgrade in Face of Increasing Missile Threats. CBS News, May 30, 2017. Available at: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/inside-thule-air-base-arctic-jeff-glor/ (accessed 10.03.2018).

18. Here’s How Norway’s New US-Made Radar Aimed at Russia Will Look. Available at: https://sputniknews.com/ military/201604151038057832-norway-missile-shield-radar/ (accessed 10.03.2018).

19. Myasnikov E. Kontrsilovoi potentsial vysokotochnogo oruzhiya [Counter-Potential of the High Precision Weapons]. Yadernoe rasprostranenie: novye tekhnologii, vooruzheniya i dogovory [Nuclear Proliferation: New Technologies, Weapons and Agreements]. Arbatov A., Dvorkin V., eds. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2009, pp. 105-128.

20. Barnes J. NATO Plans to Create Two New Commands Amid Russia Tensions. The Wall Street Journal, October 24, 2017. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/nato-plans-to-create-two-new-commands-amid-russia-tensions-1508837829 (accessed 10.03.2018).

21. НАТО проведет масштабные учения у границ России. [NATO Will Organize Large-Scale Exercises Nearby Russia’s Borders (In Russ.)] Available at: https://ria.ru/world/20180307/1515978504.html (accessed 10.03.2018).

22. Coffey L., Kochis D. NATO Summit 2016: Time for an Arctic Strategy. Issue Brief, no. 4578, June 16, 2016. Available at: https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/report/nato-summit-2016-time-arctic-strategy (accessed 10.03.2018). 

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Konyshev V., Sergunin A. U.S.-Russia Relations in the Arctic: Cooperation or Competition?. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 62, No 9, pp. 103-111. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-103-111

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

Current Issue
2020, vol. 64, No. 9

Topical Themes of the Issue:

  • World Energy after the Pandemic
  • Developing Countries in the Political Economy of the Post-Coronavirus World
  • The Prospects for Settlement of North Korean Nuclear Problem in View of the Presidential Elections in the USA 
  • EU Single Financial Market: Illusion or Reality?
  • Consequences of the Civil War in Syria and Ways of Overcoming Them
View This Issue (2020, vol. 64, No. 9)
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications. Currently, the releases of 2015–2018 are available for free. The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic version of the 4-nd issue of 2019 of French magazine Politique étrangère is now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media (e-mailing is not possible because of technical reasons).


In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!

We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!


"World Eсonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.


The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library eLIBRARY.ru or URL: https://press.gaugn.ru/.

In journal
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial