Fragfile Peace in the Arctic

491
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-97-102

A. Zagorski (zagorskiandrei@gmail.com), 
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation 

Abstract. Despite the current crisis in relations between Russia and the West, the Arctic agenda remains cooperative and constructive. There are numerous examples of progress in regional cooperation over the past few years achieved not least due to cooperation between Russia and the U.S. However, one should not take it for granted that the region can remain immune to the effects of wider politics indefinitely. The longer the current confrontation between Russia and the West persists, the more likely the space of cooperation in the Arctic would begin shrinking rather than further growing. There already are visible signs that the situation can aggravate in the not-so-distant prospective. A sense of increasing political uncertainty spreads among the Arctic countries. This pertains specifically to prospects of a cooperative management of overlapping claims over the continental shelf in the central Arctic Ocean. Particularly in Denmark, concerns are raised that Russia may abandon its previous commitments in that regard and, instead, turn to unilateral action in order to maximize its portion of the shelf through the North Pole. The Russian military build-up, although so far seen as non-threatening by the defence establishment of other Arctic states, also raises concerns as the focus increasingly shifts from assessing Russian intentions towards its capabilities. The suspension of military-political cooperation with Russia in the Arctic does not only arrest the formation of an inclusive security architecture but cements old division lines. Worst case scenarios project spill-over effects from eventual Russia-West confrontation in the Baltics or in the North Atlantic into the Arctic. The danger of unintended escalation of such developments should inform the Arctic countries to take urgent steps in order to arrest further securitization of the region and increase the predictability of their policies and conventional postures there. 

Keywords: Arctic, Russia, security, military-political environment, military postures, continental shelf 


REFERENCES

1. Arctic Imperatives: Reinforcing U.S. Strategy on America’s Fourth Coast. Washington, Council on Foreign Relations, 2017. 83 .

2. Depledge D. Hard security developments. Arctic security matters. Jokela J., ed. Paris, EU ISS, 2015, pp. 59-67.

3. Partial Revised Submission of the Russian Federation to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in Respect of the Continental Shelf of the Russian Federation in the Arctic Ocean. Executive Summary. 2015. 36 p. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.morvesti.ru/tems/detail.php?ID=38734 (accessed 22.02.2018).

4. Zagorski A.V., ed. Mezhdunarodno-politicheskie usloviya razvitiya Arkticheskoi zony Rossiiskoi Federatsii [International Political Environment for the Development of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Magistr, 2015. 304 p.

5. Intelligence Risk Assessment 2017. An assessment of developments abroad impacting on Danish security. Copenhagen, Danish Defence Intelligence Service, 2017. 55 p.

6. Capable and Sustainable. Long Term Defence Plan. Oslo, Norwegian Ministry of Defence, 2016. 20 p.

7. Intelligence Risk Assessment 2015. An assessment of developments abroad impacting on Danish security. Copenhagen, Danish Defence Intelligence Service, 2015. 51 .

8. The DDIS Intelligence Risk Assessment 2013. An intelligence assessment of developments abroad impacting on Danish security. Copenhagen, Danish Defence Intelligence Service, 2013. 58 p.

9. Intelligence Risk Assessment 2016. An assessment of developments abroad impacting on Danish security. Copenhagen, Danish Defence Intelligence Service, 2016. 55 .

10. The DDIS Intelligence Risk Assessment 2014. An assessment of developments abroad impacting on Danish security. Copenhagen, Danish Defence Intelligence Service, 2014. 55 p.

11. Agreed Minutes on the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles between the Faroe Islands, Iceland and Norway in the Southern Part of the Banana Hole of the Northeast Atlantic. Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 21 September 2006. Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/Agreed-Minutes/id446839/ (accessed 22.02.2018).

12. The High North. Visions and strategies (2011–2012). Report to the Storting (White Paper). Oslo, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2011. 143 p.

13. The United States Navy Arctic Roadmap for 2014 to 2030. Washington, Chief of Naval Operations, 2014. 43 p.

14. Le Mière Ch., Mazo J. Arctic opening: insecurity and opportunity – IISS. Abingdon, New York, Routledge, 2013. 180 p.

15. Wezeman S.T. Military capabilities in the Arctic. SIPRI Background Paper, March 2012. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/files/misc/SIPRIBP1203.pdf (accessed 01.03.2018).

16. Wezeman S.T. Military capabilities in the Arctic: A new cold war in the High North? SIPRI Background Paper, October 2016. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/Military-capabilities-in-the-Arctic.pdf (accessed 01.03.2018).

17. Shoygu reported on the most extensive military build-up in the Arctic among the countries of the world. Interfax, 26.02.2018 (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.interfax.ru/russia/601479 (accessed 01.03.2018).

18. Norwegian Armed Forces in transition. Strategic defence review by the Norwegian Chief of Defence. Abridged version. Oslo, Norwegian Armed Forces, 2015. Available at: https://forsvaret.no/en/forsvaretdocuments/strategic_defence_review_2015_abridged.pdf (accessed 01.03.2018).

19. Zagorski A.V. Bezopasnost’ v Arktike [Security in the Arctic]. Contemporary Europe, 2017, no 4, pp. 40-49.

20. Danish Diplomacy and Defence in Times of Change. A Review of Denmark’s Foreign and Security Policy. Copenhagen, 2016. Available at: http://um.dk/en/foreign-policy/danish-defence-and-diplomacy-in-times-of-change/ (accessed 01.03.2018).

21. Danish Defence Agreement 2018–2023. Danish Ministry of Defence, 2018. Available at: http://www.fmn.dk/temaer/forsvarsforlig/Documents/danish-defence-agreement-2018-2023-pdfa.pdf (accessed 05.03.2018).

22. Report on Arctic Policy. US Department of State International Security Advisory Board. 21 September 2016. 66 p. Available at: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/262585.pdf (accessed 01.03.2018).

23. Strong, secure, engaged. Canada’s defence policy. Ottawa, Naitonal Defence, 2017. 113 p.

24. Report to Congress on Strategy to Protect United States National Security Interests in the Arctic Region. Department of Defense, Desember 2016. Available at: https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2016-Arctic-Strategy-UNCLAS-cleared-for-release.pdf (accessed 01.03.2018).

25. Norway’s Arctic Strategy – between geopolitics and social development. Oslo, Norwegian Ministries, 2017. 39 p. Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/fad46f0404e14b2a9b551ca7359c1000/arctic-strategy.pdf (accessed 12.03.2018).

26. Zagorski A.V. Nestrategicheskie voprosy bezopasnosti i sotrudnichestva v Arktike [Conventional security and cooperation in the Arctic]. Moscow, IMEMO, 2016. 104 p.

27. Klimenko . Russia’s Arctic Security Policy. Still quiet in the High North? SIPRI Policy Paper No. 45, February 2016. 37 p. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/SIPRIPP45.pdf (accessed 01.03.2018).

28. Collins J.F. et al. Arctic Council Initiatives to Sustain Arctic Cooperation. Recommendations from the February 2015 Meeting at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Hanover, NH, University of the Arctic Institute for Arctic Policy and Dartmouth College, 2015. Available at: https://dickey.dartmouth.edu/sites/dickey.dartmouth.edu/files/arctic_council_initiatives_2015.pdf (accessed 10.03.2018).

29. The First Operational Exercise, Arctic Guardian, of the Arctic Coast Guard Forum (ACGF) held in Iceland. The Finnish Border Guard, 11 September, 2017. Available at: https://www.raja.fi/facts/news_from_the_border_guard/1/0/the_first_operational_exercise_arctic_guardian_of_the_arctic_coast_guard_forum_acgf_held_in_ iceland_74229 (accessed 25.01.2018). 


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Zagorskii A. Fragfile Peace in the Arctic . World Eonomy and International Relations, 2018, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 97-102. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-97-102



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 5
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Are There Any Ways to Break Through the Korean Nuclear Impasse?
  • Contemporary U.S. Taiwan Policy: Balancing on the Edge
  • The Gulf Monarchies’ Vision of the Global Order Transformations and the Russian Place in It
  • At Post-Soviet Space
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.