India: Development Disparities and Geoeconomic Capacity

524
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-5-97-109

A. Volodin (andreivolodine@gmail.com),
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow 117997, Russian Federation 



Abstract

With India taken as a case-study, the author gives special attention to the “polarized” type of development (disintegration of national economy), which affects the economic potential of the state. India, like many other transitional societies, is still at the middle stages of market-governed development and is still to resolve the controversy between economic growth and social equity. In such cases, “free market” is not in a position to find the optimal balance between initiative and intervention. According to the present writer, economic parameters per se cannot be treated as a yardstick for trajectory of development. Disparities in interregional development tend to be more articulated under rapid economic growth. The global recession of the 2010s has made a task of instituting a balanced socio-economic development even harder to attain. Across the terrain of subcontinental landmass, two basic types of socio-economic development are singled out: number one – stationary (the most populous states of India), and number two – isolated (the Northeastern states) due to geographic “separation” from the “mainland” India. The states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar accounting for a quarter of India’s population, suffer from poor infrastructure for development and need a “blitzkrieg” of investment in power, roads and agriculture to generate economic growth. Lack of investments will make it more difficult to achieve and sustain a high rate of growth in the years to come. The political context of development in the “superlarge” states is aggravated by erosion of the Hindu United Family, on the one hand, and by synchronous pressures of rising social aspirations and stagnant or slow-growing incomes, on the other. Northeast India, a diverse region comprising eight states, is connected with “mainland” India by a passage less than 29 kms wide. The region lost connectivity and market access as a result of the Partition in 1947. The connectivity loss is instrumental for sluggish development of India’s North East that has now fallen behind other states and territories of the country. Given the geographical proximity of the area to South East Asia, economic cooperation may accelerate growth in India’s North East. Nonetheless, blending of domestic policy with foreign policy has not yet attained desired economic results. India is undergoing not only an economic but also a political change. The future of the country is ultimately dependent on harmonizing interests of winners and losers of development. In terms of political economy, both types of development are to be encouraged by targeted investments to overcome “stationary equilibrium”. According to the author, India’s (existent) investment potential is not adequate to stimulate economic growth. One of the “hidden” resources for rapid growth and advanced geoeconomic potential is tentative investment cooperation with foreign countries, including Russia. 


Keywords

India, disparities of development, disintegration of economy, “dualistic” economic growth, caste system, economic geography, “stationary” type of development, “isolated” type of development, SAARC, South Asia 


REFERENCES

1. Chengappa R. Modi Made a Strong Comeback. India Today, 17.08.2016. Available at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/mood-of-the-nation-india-today-karvy-insights-survey-narendra-modi/1/742910.html (accessed 01.12.2017).

2. Panagariya A. India: the Emerging Giant. New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 2008. 545 р.

3. Jha P. Sh. India and China. The Battle between Soft and Hard Power. New Delhi, Penguin-Viking, 2010. 398 p.

4. Bardhan P. Awakening Giants, Feet of Clay. Assessing the Economic Rise of China and India. Princeton-Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2010. 172 p.

5. Nayar B.R. The Geopolitics of Globalization. The Consequences for Development. New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 2005. 301 p.

6. Shirokov G.K., ed. Economika Indii: obhschaya kharakteristika [Economy of India: a General Overview]. Moscow, Nauka, 1980. 271 p.

7. Kolontaev A.P. Problema zanyatosti v razvivayushcheisya ekonomike. Opyt nezavisimoi Indii [Employment in a Developing Economy. India as a Case-Study]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988. 186 p.

8. Simonia N.A., ed. Gorod v formaccionnom razvitii Vostoka [The Orient: City as a Force of Societal Transformation] Moscow, Nauka, 1990. 512 p.

9. Sdasyuk G.V. Indiya. Geografiya khozyaistva [India. Geography of National Economy.] Moscow, Mysl’, 1975. 367 p.

10. Dmitriev R.V. Opornyj karkas rasseleniya I hozjaistva sovremennoi Indii [Modern India: Foundations of Population Distribution and National Economy]. Moscow, MAKS Press, 2014. 156 p.

11. Datta A., Mishra S.K., Rodgers G., Rodgers J., Sharma A.N. Social and Economic Change in Rural Bihar and the Emerging Policy Framework. Summary of the Main Findings. New Delhi, Institute for Human Development, 2012. 21 p.

12. Rasul G., Sharma E. Understanding the Poor Economic Performance of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India: a Macro-Perspective. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2014, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 221-239.

13. Pal R. Socio-Economic Development of Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, August 2014, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 210-216.

14. Malhotra R., Gill S.S., eds. India’s North-East and Asiatic South-East: Beyond Borders. Chandigarh, CRRID, 2015. 302 p.

15. Lee L. India as a Nation of Consequence in Asia: the Potential and Limitations of India’s “Act East” Policy. The Journal of East Asian Affairs, Fall/Winter 2015, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 67-104. 


Text 

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Volodin A. India: Development Disparities and Geoeconomic Capacity. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 62, No 5, pp. 97-109. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-5-97-109



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed
 
Current Issue
2020, vol. 64, No. 11

Topical Themes of the Issue:

  • • Comparative Analyses of Terrorist Threats under Conditions of COVID 19
  • • Competitive Education in the Third Millenium: Quo Vadis?
  • • Models of Regional Leadership in Eurasia: to the New Research Agenda
  • • Russia: “Late-Take off Society” in the Whirlwind of World Politics
  • • Development of a National School of Political Science in China
View This Issue (2020, vol. 64, No. 11)
Submit an Article
Announcement

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications.The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.


Dear colleagues, authors and readers!
We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic versions of the I, II, III issues of 2020 of French magazine Politique étrangère are now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media.
NEW SECTION

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.

CONTEST!

"World Eсonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE JOURNAL

The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library eLIBRARY.ru or URL: https://press.gaugn.ru/.

In journal
Years
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial