Metamorphoses of Intra-Syria Negotiation Process

415
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-3-20-28

L. Isaev (isleonid@yandex.ru),
National Research University Higher School of Economics, 20, Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation;
Institute for African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 30/1, Spiridonovka Str., Moscow, 123001, Russian Federation. A. Korotaev (akorotayev@gmail.com),
National Research University Higher School of Economics, 20, Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation;
Institute for African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 30/1, Spiridonovka Str., Moscow, 123001, Russian Federation;
A. Mardasov (anton.mardasoff@yandex.ru),
Institute for Innovative Development, 8/5, Timura Frunze Str., Moscow, 119034, Russian Federation 

Acknowledgments. The article has been supported by a grant of the Russian Science Foundation. Project 14-18-03615 “Russia’s Policy in the Middle East: Possibilities and Limits of the Cooperation with Regional Countries”. 



Abstract

The article offers a systematic analysis of negotiation processes aimed at the settlement of the Syrian conflict. Special attention is paid to the negotiations in Geneva and Astana. Despite the fact that Geneva remains the main platform for the intra-Syrian dialogue, the large number of participants involved in the conflict, the stalemate of the situation, and the very broad agenda predetermined a tendency towards regionalization and particularization of the Syrian negotiation process. As a result, the process acquired a three-level format. The leading role in it is still played by the International Syria Support Group (ISSG) and the Geneva negotiations initiated by it, which approve all key political decisions on the Syrian conflict. The Astana talks sponsored by Russia, Turkey and Iran constitute an intermediate negotiating platform, whose main goal is to optimize the Geneva peace process, eliminating the military agenda from it. In addition, Astana serves to legitimize decisions adopted at the talks in Amman and Cairo with a more local status, which are, in turn, destined to complement Astana negotiations and bring a maximum number of parties to the table, required for the intra-Syrian dialogue.


Keywords

Syria, Middle East, Russia, Geneva, Astana, negotiation process, coalitions, Bashar al-Assad, The National Coordination Body for Democratic Change, The National Coalition for Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces 


REFERENCES

1. UN Security Council Resolution 2254 (2015). Available at: http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/s_res_2254.pdf (accessed 21.09.2017).

2. Grinin L.E., Isaev L.M., Korotaev A.V. Revolyutsii i nestabil’nost’ na Blizhnem Vostoke [Revolutions and Instability at the Middle East]. Moscow, Uchitel Publ., 2015. 394 p.

3. Intra-Syrian Negotiations under the Auspices of the UN in Geneva (2016–2017) (In Russ.) Available at: https://ria.ru/spravka/20170710/1497980585.html (accessed 18.09.2017).

4. Walking in a Circle: Why Are Negotiations in Geneva Without Kurds Doomed to Failure (In Russ.) Available at: https://ria.ru/world/20170227/1488829671.html (accessed 18.09.2017).

5. Joint Statement by the Foreign Ministers of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Turkey on Agreed Steps to Revitalize the Political Process to End the Syrian Conflict. Moscow. Available at: http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/2573489 (accessed 10.08.2017).

6. Astana Joint Statement by Iran, Russia, Turkey: in Full. Available at: http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/2864541 (accessed 20.09.2017).

7. Strokan’ S. Peregovornyi protest [Negotiation’s Protest]. Kommersant, 10.11.2017.

8. Isaev L. “Troika” po peregovoram: smogut li Rossiya, Iran i Turtsiya dat’ mir Sirii? [“Troyka” in Negotiations: Will Russia, Iran and Turkey Give a Peace to Syria?] Available at: http://www.rbc.ru/opinions/politics/22/01/2017/5884b3629a79471c459d5094 (accessed 03.09.2017).

9. Isaev L. The Spoils of Peace Is Broking in Syria. Available at: http://intersectionproject.eu/article/russia-world/spoilspeace-broking-syria (accessed 20.09.2017).

10. Isaev L. Is Peace Prevailing After Astana? Available at: http://intersectionproject.eu/article/russia-world/peace-prevailing-after-astana (accessed 03.09.2017).

11. Mardasov A., Semenov K. Pomirit’sya s partiei voiny. Kak dobit’sya prekrashcheniya ognya v Sirii [Reconcile with the War Party. How Achieve a Ceasefire in Syria] Available at: https://republic.ru/posts/82283 (accessed 03.05.2017).

12. Final De-escalation Zones Agreed on in Astana. Available at: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/09/final-de-escalationzones-agreed-astana-170915102811730.html (accessed 20.09.2017).

13. Faylaq Al-Rahman Joins De-escalation Agreement in Eastern Ghouta. Available at: https://southfront.org/faylaq-al-rahman-joins-de-escalation-agreement-in-eastern-ghouta/ (accessed 19.05.2017).

14. Magen Z., Dekel U. The Trump–Putin Meeting: From Hamburg to Southern Syria. Available at: http://www.inss.org.il/publication/the-trump-putin-meeting-from-hamburg-to-southern-syria/ (accessed 20.09.2017).

15. Rosen L. US, Russia Hold Secret Talks Over South Syria Safe Zone. Available at: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/06/us-russia-secret-talks-south-syria-safe-zone.html (accessed 01.06.2017).

16. The US Coalition in Syria Once Again Struck at the Supporters of Assad (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.bbc.com/russian/news-40180645 (accessed 06.06.2017).

17. Mardasov A., Semenov K. “Yuzhnaya sdelka” Moskvy i Vashingtona: duel’ dvukh diplomatii [“Southern Deal” of Moscow and Washington: Duel of Two Diplomacies] Available at: http://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/yuzhnaya-sdelkamoskvy-i-vashingtona-duel-dvukh-diplomatiy/ (accessed 13.07.2017).

18. Mardasov A. Voprosy k soglasheniyu Rossii i SSHA po yugy Sirii [Questions Concerning Agreement Between Russia and USA on Syria] Available at: http://www.imesclub.org/ru/tribune-rus/2017-07-11-00-27-21 (accessed 11.07.2017).

19. Mardasov A. The Kremlin’s contradictory behavior in Syria. Available at: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/07/russia-behavior-syria-turkey-idlib-military-base.html (accessed 07.07.2017).

20. Isaev L., Kozhanov N. The Russian-Saudi Rapprochement and Iran. Available at: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2017/08/russian-saudi-rapprochement-iran-170817154056810.html (accessed 30.08.2017).

21. Mardasov A. Astana mezhdu Kairom i Ammanom [Astana Between Cairo and Amman] Available at: http://www.ng.ru/dipkurer/2017-09-04/10_7065_astana.html (accessed 04.09.2017).

22. Qatar Falconry Party: When the Hunters Became the Hunted in Iraq. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/57aeba9c-4c4f-11e7-a3f4-c742b9791d43 (accessed 09.06.2017). 


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Isaev L., Korotaev A., Mardasov A. Metamorphoses of Intra-Syria Negotiation Process. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2018, vol. 62, No 3, pp. 20-28. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-3-20-28



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Current Issue
2022, vol. 66, No. 7
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  •  Pandemic: Return to the Past or Window into the Future?
  •  Currency Internationalization: Analysis of World Experience and Choice of Russian Path
  •  Migration Risks of the Afghan Crisis
  •  Russia on the Eve of Participating in the War of Indentists and Antiidentists
View This Issue (2022, vol. 66, No. 7)
Submit an Article
NEW SECTION

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.