The New US Sanctions Regime against Iran

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-2-28-36

A. Davydov (,
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, 
Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow 117997, Russian Federation;
S. Kislitsyn (,
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, 
Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow 117997, Russian Federation 


The article examines the current state of the U.S. sanctions policy towards Iran and its transformation prospects. Specifically, it describes new provisions of the sanctions regime under the “Countering America’s Adversaries through Sanctions Act” of 2017, as well as other acting provisions of this policy. The authors present the current discourse on the subject in the American political establishment. The U. S.-Iran relations are traditionally of adversarial nature. For more than 30 years, the Islamic Republic of Iran is considered by the United States as a hostile, terrorism-sponsoring nation that threatens regional security in the Middle East. Since the Islamic Revolution of 1979, the Iranian government has been under a number of U.S.-imposed sanctions which only intensified through decades, although their efficiency was questionable until recently. The most serious impact on Iran’s economy was made by multilateral sanctions imposed by the U. N. Security Council resolution 1929 (2010), which forced Iranian officials to participate in P5+1 negotiating process. The eventually adopted Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, JCPOA (October 2015) stopped Iranians from getting a nuclear weapon. Since implementation of the deal (January 2016), the U.S. has lifted sanctions on Iran’s economy in compliance with it. This sparked a political debate in the United States on whether Washington should unilaterally withdraw from the agreement or not. The opponents of the JCPOA, predominantly republicans, argue that Iran is using the relieved resources to fund terrorism, its destabilizing activities in the Middle East and to threaten U.S. allies in the region. The supporters of the deal, mostly democrats, presume that the withdrawal would only stimulate Iranians to get a nuclear weapon hence the failure of diplomatic means to solve the problem. Nevertheless, both parties consider Iran as a hostile regime, and in order to impose additional pressure on it for its policies, Congress almost unanimously passed the “Countering America’s Adversaries through Sanctions Act” (2017). The Act severed the other existing sanctions not lifted by the JCPOA. By analyzing the U.S. sanctions policy towards Iran and the current discourse in the political establishment on the subject, the authors come to a conclusion that a unilateral withdrawal from the deal is not likely to happen. The United States will probably pursue a containment strategy towards Iran and will provoke its government to violate the JCPOA provisions – in order to re-impose severe sanctions on a multilateral basis, which would deliver the U.S. from undermining its relations with its allies. 


sanctions against Iran, Iran, sanctions, JCPOA, U.S. foreign policy, Neoconservatism, democracy promotion policy 


1. Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran (GOV/2006/15). International Atomic Energy Agency. 27 February 2006. Available at:–15.pdf (accessed 07.09.2017).

2. Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

3. Kurshakov V. Neftegazovyi faktor vo vneshnei politike Irana [Oil and Gas Factor in Iran’s Foreign Policy]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2013, no. 3, pp. 88-96.

4. Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, 14 July 2015. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

5. Cox M., Lynch T. J., Bouchet N., eds. US Foreign Policy and Democracy Promotion: from Theodore Roosevelt to Barack Obama. London, New York, Routledge, 2013. 222 p.

6. USAID, The Complete Foreign Aid Explorer Dataset. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

7. After Nuclear Deal, U. S. Views of Iran Remain Dismal. Gallup News, 17.02.2016. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

8. Launch Statement. Diplomacy Works, 15.05.2017. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

9. Statement by the President on Iran. The White House. 17 January 2016. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

10. Duss M. The Iran Deal Is a Victory for Obama Diplomacy over Bush Warmongering. The New Republic, July 14, 2015. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

11. Tharoor I. The Obama-Netanyahu Fight over Iran, Explained. The Washington Post, 27.02.2015. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

12. Easley C. Iran Deal Is More Popular Than Ever, Poll Shows. Morning Consult, 26.04.2017. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

13. Obama: Trump Likely not to Seek Iran Deal Changes. CNN Politics, 14.11.2016. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

14. Rubin M. The Iran Deal’s Silver Lining? Commentary, 11.07.2016. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

15. Liberman J. I. How Trump Should Renegotiate the Iran Deal. The Washington Post, 06.12.2016. Available at: (accessed 31.05.2017).

16. Nau H. R. How Restraint Leads to War. Commentary, 01.09.2015. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

17. Tobin J. S. The Democratic Divorce from Israel. Commentary, 01.12.2015. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

18. Podhoretz N. The Emergency. Commentary, 01.05.2015. Available at: (accessed 13.06.2017).

19. Coats D. R. Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. May 11, 2017. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

20. Ross D., Petraeus D. H. How to Put Some Teeth into the Nuclear Deal with Iran. The Washington Post, 25.08.2015. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

21. Senate Panel Backs Bill to Authorize New Sanctions on Iran. US News and World Report, 25.05.2017. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

22. Senate Panel Backs New Sanctions on Iran. Voice of America, 25.05.2017. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017).

23. Litwak R. S. An Iran-Style Nuclear Deal with North Korea Is the Best America Can Hope for. The Atlantic, May 4, 2017. Available at: (accessed 07.09.2017). 

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Davydov A., Kislitsyn S. The New US Sanctions Regime against Iran. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 62, No 2, pp. 28-36.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

Current Issue
2020, vol. 64, No. 9

Topical Themes of the Issue:

  • World Energy after the Pandemic
  • Developing Countries in the Political Economy of the Post-Coronavirus World
  • The Prospects for Settlement of North Korean Nuclear Problem in View of the Presidential Elections in the USA 
  • EU Single Financial Market: Illusion or Reality?
  • Consequences of the Civil War in Syria and Ways of Overcoming Them
View This Issue (2020, vol. 64, No. 9)
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications. Currently, the releases of 2015–2018 are available for free. The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic version of the 4-nd issue of 2019 of French magazine Politique étrangère is now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media (e-mailing is not possible because of technical reasons).


In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!

We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!


"World Eсonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.


The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library or URL:

In journal
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial