Azov and Black Sea Region: New Political and Legal Realities (Part I)

510
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-10-91-102

P. Gudev (gudev@imemo.ru),
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow 117997, Russian Federation 

Abstract. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Sea of Azov and the Kerch Strait, previously a single maritime space of one state, had became the subject of an interstate dispute between Russia and Ukraine regarding the determination of their legal status and delimitation. The article analyzes the legal and political posi¬tions of both sides and their conformity with the modern international law norms, and the national interests of each state. The advantages of keeping the legal status of the internal historic waters under the full state sovereignty of both states with regards to the Azov Sea are considered; the negative aspects of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention’s norms and provisions application to this marine area, leading to a decrease of its legal status and the appearance of third countries’ legitimate interests, are analyzed. The Russian-Ukrainian treaties and agreements concerning this issue are examined, and the negative consequences of their denun¬ciation are described. Examples of how the status of internal historical waters can be applied to the maritime region of joint use of several states, and why the status of the common natural and economic complex pres¬ervation for the Azov Sea is more in interests of both countries, are given. The problems of the Kerch Strait water area’s legal status are touched upon, and the most acute plot of modern Russian-Ukrainian relations, namely, the construction the Kerch bridge, is not bypassed. The facts about the international practice of settling this type of disputes are given; legal claims of the Ukrainian side to the construction of this kind of hydraulic structures critically analyzed. Finally, the article shows how the entry of the Crimea into the Russian Federation led to a fundamental change in possible claims of Russia and Ukraine, as well as to the fact that the settlement of the situation on a number of issues in these areas has become even more difficult. 

Keywords: Sea of Azov, Kerch Strait, Kerch Bridge, Kerch-Yenikal Canal, delimitation of maritime spaces, middle line, internal historical waters, 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 


REFERENCES

1. Surzhin A. A. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoi rezhim Azovskogo morya i Kerchenskogo proliva [The international legal regime of Azov Sea and Kertch strait] Ezhegodnik morskogo prava 2008. Yubileinoe izdanie k 40-letiyu Assotsiatsii mezhdunarodnogo morskogo prava [Yearbook of the law of the Sea. Anniversary edition for the 40th anniversary of the Association of International Maritime Law]. Kolodkin A. L., ed. Moscow, Linkor, 2009. 494 p.

2. Surzhin A. S. Azovskoe more i Kerchenskii proliv. Sovremennyi mezhdunarodno-pravovoi rezhim i perspektivy razvitiya [The Azov Sea and the Kerch Strait. Modern international legal regime and development prospects]. International Law, 2010, no. 4, pp. 77-85.

3. On the negotiations to determine the legal status of the Azov Sea and the Kerch Strait and the delineation of maritime areas in the Black Sea. On the delimitation of the Russian-Ukrainian state border (Reference information) (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.mid.ru/maps/ua/-/asset_publisher/ktn0ZLTvbbS3/content/id/595928 (accessed 12.11.2017).

4. Vasil’ev V.Ya. K voprosu pravovogo statusa Azovo-Kerchenskoi akvatorii [On the issue of the legal status of the Azov-Kerch water area]. Morskie Vesti Rossii, 2016, no. 8, pp. 10-11.

5. Agreement between the Russian Federation and Ukraine on cooperation in the use of the Azov Sea and the Kerch Strait. December 24, 2003 (In Russ.) Available at: http://kremlin.ru/supplement/1795 (accessed 16.01.2018).

6. Ukraine relies on assistance from third countries on the Azov Sea issue (In Russ.) Available at: http://ria.ru/politics/20060605/49093665.html (accessed 18.02.2018).

7. Draft Law on denunciation of the Treaty between Ukraine and the Russian Federation on cooperation in the use of the Azov sea and the Kerch (In Ukr.) Available at: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=56077 (accessed 19.02.2018).

8. Teoriya i praktika morskoi deyatel’nosti. Vyp.2. Referativnyi ocherk. [Theory and practice of marine activity. Issue. 2. Abstract]. Moscow, SOPS RAN, 2004. 168 p.

9. Kolodkin A.L., Gutsulyak V.N., Bobrova Yu.V. Mirovoi okean. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoi rezhim. Osnovnye problemy [World Ocean. The international legal regime. Main problems]. Moscow, Statut, 2007. 637 p.

10. Shemyakin A. N. Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe morskoe pravo i perspektivy ego razvitiya [Modern international maritime law and prospects for its development]. Odessa, OGMA, 2006. 316 p.

11. Lopez Martin A. G. International Straits. Concept, Classification and Rules of Passage. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2010. 218 p.

12. Glandin S.V. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty dogovornogo razdela dna Azovskogo moray [International legal aspects of the agreement delimitation of the seabed of the Azov Sea] Available at: http://magazine.sea-law.ru/arkhiv-zhurnala/51-internet-zhurnal-morskoe-pravo-2007g/internet-zhurnal-morskoe-pravo-1-yanvar-fevral-mart-2007g/575-glandin-s-v-mezhdunarodno-pravovye-aspekty-dogovornogo-razdela-dna-azovskogo-morya.html (accessed 03.03.2018).

13. Surzhin A.S. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoi rezhim Chernogo morya (vklyuchaya Azovo-Kerchenskuyu akvatoriyu i chernomorskie prolivy). Diss. cand. ur. nauk [The international legal regime of the Black Sea (including the Azov-Kerch water area and the Black Sea straits) Cand. Diss (Jur.)]. Moscow, 2011. 239 p.

14. Vylegzhanin A.N. Teoriya i praktika ispol’zovaniya osobykh obstoyatel’stv v reshenii problem mezhdunarodnogo morskogo prava. Diss. cand. jurid. nauk [Theory and practice of using special circumstances in solving the problems of international maritime law. Cand. Diss (Jur.)]. Moscow, 1984. 164 p.

15. Tikhonova S.N. Osobennosti dogovornogo regulirovaniya voprosa o delimitatsii morskikh prostranstv v Azovo-Kerchenskoi akvatorii [Features of Treaty regulation of the issue of Maritime delimitation in the Azov-Kerch water area]. Vlast’ i obshchestvo: grani vzaimodeistviya: materialy IX vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Gosudarstvo, pravo, upravlenie – 2009” [Power and Society: Facets of Interaction: Proceedings of the IX All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “State, Law, Management – 2009”]. Moscow, GUU, 2010, Part 2, p. 87-92.

16. Antselevich G.A. Mezhdunarodnoe morskoe torgovoe parvo [International Maritime Commercial Law]. Kiev, Slovo, 2004. 400 p.

17. Skaridov A.S. Pravovoi rezhim Azovo-Chernomorskogo basseina i regional’naya bezopasnost’ [Legal regime of the Azov-Black Sea basin and regional security]. Eurasian Law Journal, 2016, no. 11(102), pp. 260-271.

18. The bridge to the Crimea is prevented from building customs. Why it is impossible to build a bridge to Crimea without permission of Ukraine (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.gazeta.ru/science/2015/01/12_a_6365573.shtml (accessed 15.02.2018).

19. Tanaka Yoshifumi. The International Law of the Sea. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2012. 501 p.

20. ICJ. Passage through the Great Belt (Finland v. Denmark). Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/86/6861.pdf (accessed 19.02.1018).

21. Act of the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation of October 21, 2015, no. 313 “On Approval of Mandatory Orders in the Sea Port of Kerch” (In Russ.) Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/420312576 (accessed 12.02.2018).

22. They Pass: Ukrainians cheated, promising the decline of ports because of the Bridge to the Crimea (In Russ.) Available at: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2017/09/08/prohodyat-ukraincev-obmanuli-poobeshchav-upadok-portov-iz-za-mosta-v-krym (accessed 11.02.2018).

23. Serbenko N. K voprosu ob ispol’zovanii Kerchenskogo proliva ili pochemu rossiisko-ukrainskii dogovor narushaet mezhdunarodnoe pravo? [On the use of the Kerch Strait or why does the Russian-Ukrainian treaty violate international law?] Available at: http://bintel.com.ua/ru/article/kerch/ (17.01.2018).

24. Vylegzhanin A.N., ed. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya kvalifikatsiya morskikh raionov v kachestve istoricheskikh vod (teoriya i praktika gosudarstv) [International legal qualification of marine areas as historical waters (theory and practice of states)]. Moscow, MGIMO, 2012. 112 p.

25. United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea Geneva, Switzerland 24 February to 27 April 1958 Document:- A/ CONF.13/1 Historic Bays: Memorandum by the Secretariat of the United Nations Extract from the Official Records of the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, vol. I (Preparatory Documents). Available at: http://legal.un.org/docs/?path=/diplomaticconferences/1958_los/docs/english/vol_1/a_conf13_1.pdf&lang=E (accessed 02.03.2018).

26. Thomas A. R., Duncan James C., ds. Annotated Supplement to the Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations. International Law Studies. Vol. 73. Naval War College, Newport, Rhode Island, 1999, . 526. Available at: https://ia801601.us.archive.org/11/items/annotatedsupplem73thom/annotatedsupplem73thom.pdf (accessed 07.03.2018).

27. The Legal Basis for the Historical Water Status in the Light of the International Maritime Law Development. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 19 March 1987. 32 p. Archive IMEMO (In Russ)  

28. Nikolaev A.N., Sokolova E.L. Status zaliva Fonseka (po materialam Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON) [Status of the Fonseca Bay (based on the materials of the International Court of Justice of the United Nations)]. Moscow Journal on International Law, 2013, no. 4, pp. 89-97.

29. International Court of Justice (ICJ). Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras: Nicaragua intervening). Judgment of 11 September 1992. 271 p. Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/75/075-19920911-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf (accessed 01.03.2018).

30. Address by V. Kalyuzhny, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia, Special Representative of the President of the Russian Federation for the Regulation of the Status of the Caspian Sea, at the International Conference on the Caspian and Azov-Kerch Settlement December, 3 2003 (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.mid.ru/press_service/deputy_ministers_speeches/-/asset_publisher/O3publba0Cjv/content/id/494530 (06.03.2018). 


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Gudev P. Azov and Black Sea Region: New Political and Legal Realities (Part I). World Eonomy and International Relations, 2018, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 91-102. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-10-91-102



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 5
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Are There Any Ways to Break Through the Korean Nuclear Impasse?
  • Contemporary U.S. Taiwan Policy: Balancing on the Edge
  • The Gulf Monarchies’ Vision of the Global Order Transformations and the Russian Place in It
  • At Post-Soviet Space
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.