Central Asia: Heuristics and Models

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-10-114-123

A. Karimova (albecar@yandex.ru),
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997 Russian Federation 


The article presents the results of study of the Central Asia natural region construction process, which has a long scientific tradition in Russia and in the world. It shows the evolution of this structure from a hypothesis to geographic, strategic and futurological constructions. While analyzing the empirics of Central Asian complexes, products of external actors’ geopolitical activity in the post-Soviet space were identified and compared. Heuristics have been highlighted in a geographic discourse, which were also revealed in new approaches to modeling the political form of the region. The materials used to identify heuristics were the works of European authors (K. Ritter, F. Ratzel, A. Humboldt, V. Vogel) containing spatial hypotheses which created conditions for transformation of supranational institutions into post-national mechanisms for the management of a macroregion that took the form of a European states union. Current models of Central Asia are historically linked to heuristics of the geographic core of Asia and its transition zones. The objectification of historical and modern models allowed tracing the spatial transformation of the taxon, separating the geographic core from the new political formation denoted as “Central Asia of five states” (pentad). The contradiction between geographical and political discourses is caused by the Western community’s perception of the post-Soviet space as a frontier, a unique part of which is Kazakhstan and the countries of Central Asia. It has been revealed that geographic principles in regional presentations being part of globally oriented survival strategies in modern models of external governance in Central Asia are being used improperly flexible; the use of dialogical technologies is called to embody the design aim in the form imposed on the transformed object of the future. 


Central Asia, regional space, transition zone, natural region, political region, Central Asia of the five states, pentad, frontier 


1. Ritter C. Zemlevedenie Azii Karla Rittera. Geografiya stran, vkhodyashchikh v sostav aziatskoi Rossii ili pogranichnykh s neyu, t. n. Sibiri, Kitaiskoi imperii, Turkestana, Nezavisimoi Tatarii i Persii [The Geography of Asia by Carl Ritter. Geography of the Countries that Make up Asian Russia or Border with It, so Called Siberia, the Chinese Empire, Turkestan, Independent Tatarstan, and Persia]. St. Petersburg, Russian Geographical Society, 1874. Vol. 1. 762 p.

2. Humboldt A. Tsentral’naya Aziya. Issledovaniya o tsepyakh gor i po sravnitel’noi klimatologii [Research on the Chains of Mountains and Comparative Climatology]. Moscow, 1915. 350 p.

3. Ratzel F. Zemlya i zhizn’. Sravnitel’noe zemlevedenie. V 2-kh tt. [Earth and Life. Comparative Geography. In 2 vols.]. St. Petersburg, AO Brokgauz i Efron, 1905. Vol. I. 737 p.; 1906. Vol. II. 730 p.

4. Vogel V. Novaya Evropa i ee istoriko-geograficheskie obosnovaniya. T.1 [New Europe and Its Historical and Geographical Grounds. Vol. 1]. Petrograd–Moscow, Kniga, 1924. 256 p.

5. Karimova A.B. Brexit: integratsionnyi razvorot. 27 iyunya 2016 [Brexit: Integration Turn. June 27, 2016] Available at: http://www.imemo.ru/index.php?page_id=502&id=2462&ret=640 (accessed 27.02.2018).

6. Hansen V. Velikii Shelkovyi put’. Portovye marshruty cherez Srednyuyu Aziyu. Kitai–Sogdiana–Persiya–Levant [The Silk Road: A New History]. Moscow, Tsentrpoligraf, 2014. 475 p.

7. Sievers V. Aziya. Vsemirnaya geografiya [Asia. Worldwide Geography]. St. Petersburg, Knigoizdatel’skoe Tovarishchestvo “Prosveshchenie”, 1900. 724 p.

8. Sievers V. Razvitie vzglyadov na ponyatiya “Tsentral’naya Aziya”, “Srednyaya Aziya”, “Gornaya Aziya” i “Vnutrennyaya Aziya” v klassicheskoi nemetskoi i russkoi geografii [Development of Vews on the Concepts of “Central Asia”, “Middle Asia”, “Mountain Asia” and “Inner Asia” in Classical German and Russian Geography]. Available at: http://geo.1september.ru/article.php?ID=200303007 (accessed 21.02.2018).

9. Buzan B., Waever O. Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003. 570 p.

10. Legvold R. Interesy velikikh derzhav v Tsentral’noi Azii [The Interests of the Major Powers in Central Asia]. Strategicheskie perspektivy: vedushchie derzhavy, Kazakhstan i tsentral’noaziatskii uzel [Thinking Strategically: The Major Powers, Kazakhstan, and the Central Asian Nexus]. Legvold R., ed. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2004, pp. 1-46.

11. Garnett Sh. Strategicheskie problemy Kazakhstana i Vnutrennei Azii [Strategic Problems of Kazakhstan and Inner Asia]. Strategicheskie perspektivy: vedushchie derzhavy, Kazakhstan i tsentral’noaziatskii uzel [Thinking Strategically: The Major Powers, Kazakhstan, and the Central Asian Nexus]. Legvold R., ed. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2004, pp. 259-281.

12. Ayres A. Trump to Cut Foreign Aid Budgets, Opening South and Central Asia’s Door to Chinese Influence. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/blog/trump-cut-foreign-aid-budgets-opening-south-and-central-asias-door-chinese-influence (accessed 26.02.2018).

13. Reeves M. Border Work: Spatial Lives of the State in Rural Central Asia. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 2014. 312 p.

14. Laruelle M., ed. Migration and Social Upheaval as the Face of Globalization in Central Asia. Leiden, Brill Academic Publishing, 2013. 414 р.

15. Starr F. Utrachennoe Prosveshchenie. Zolotoi vek Tsentral’noi Azii ot arabskogo zavoevaniya do vremen Tamerlana [Lost Enlightenment: Central Asia’s Golden Age from the Arab Conquest to Tamerlane]. Moscow, Alpina Publisher, 2017. 574 p.

16. Karimova A. B. Transregional’noe “sechenie” mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Transregional “Cross-section” of International relations]. 25 let vneshnei politike Rossii: sb. materialov X Konventa RAMI (Moskva, 8–9 dekabrya 2016 g.). V 5-ti tt. [25 Years of Foreign Policy of Russia. Coll. Materials of Convention of RAMI (Moscow, December 8-9, 2016). In 5 vols.]. Moscow, MGIMO University, 2017. Vol. 2, pp. 326-337.

17. Saaty T. Prinyatie reshenii. Metody analiza ierarkhii [The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation]. Moscow, Radiosvyaz’, 1993. 278 p.

18. Wiener N. Kibernetika i obshchestvo. Tvorets i robot [The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society]. Moscow, Taideks Ko, 2003. 246 p.

19. Matveeva A. EU Stakes in Central Asia. Chaillot Paper № 91. European Union Institute for Security Studies, Paris, 2006. 125 p.

20. The EU and Central Asia: Strategy for a New Partnership. Council of the European Union, 31 May 2007. Brussels, 2007. 20 p.

21. Black Sea Synergy – A New Regional Cooperation Initiative. Commission of the European Communities. 2007. Brussels, COM (2007) 160 final. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/enp/pdf/pdf/com07_160_en.pdf (accessed 24.02.2018).

22. Asmus R. D. Evro-atlanticheskoe Prichernomor’e [Euro-Atlantic Black Sea Region]. Russia in Global Affairs, 2007, May/June, no. 3. Available at: http://globalaffairs.ru/numbers/26 (accessed 24.02.2018).

23. UNESCO in Central Asia at the Dawn of the Third Millennium. External Relations and Cooperation Branch of UNESCO. Paris, 2008. 54 p. (In Russ.)

24. Shustov A. Energokhab Tsentral’noi Azii: Kazakhstan ili Uzbekistan? 27 iyunya 2017 g. [Energy Hab in Central Asia: Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan? June 27, 2017] Available at: http://eurasia.expert/energokhab-tsentralnoy-azii-kazakhstan-ili-uzbekistan/ (accessed 26.02.2018).

25. Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st Century Maritime Silk Road. Available at: http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201503/t20150330_669367.html (accessed 26.02.2018).

26. Haidar S. Why Did India Boycott China’s Road Summit? Available at: http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/why-did-india-boycott-chinas-road-summit/article18516163.ece (accessed 26.02.2018).

27. Winter T. One Belt, One Road, One Heritage: Cultural Diplomacy and the Silk Road. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2016/03/one-belt-one-road-one-heritage-cultural-diplomacy-and-the-silk-road/ (accessed 25.05.2018).

28. Witte M. China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan Propose Silk Road Corridor for World Heritage Status. Available at: https://astanatimes.com/2013/09/china-kazakhstan-kyrgyzstan-propose-silk-road-corridor-for-world-heritage-status/ (accessed 25.05.2018). 


Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Karimova A. Central Asia: Heuristics and Models. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, vol. 62, No 10, pp. 114-123. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-10-114-123

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

Current Issue
Submit an Article

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications.The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.

Dear colleagues, authors and readers!
We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic versions of the I, II, III issues of 2020 of French magazine Politique étrangère are now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media.

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.


"World Eсonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.


The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library eLIBRARY.ru or URL: https://press.gaugn.ru/.

In journal
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial