V. Varnavskii (varnavsky@imemo.ru),
Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, 65, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation;
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
Acknowledgements. The article was prepared at the Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences and supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 14-28-00097 “The optimization of Russian external investment ties under deterioration of relations with the EU”).
Abstract. The article is aimed to investigate and discuss methodological issues and challenges related to the measurement of international trade in value added terms. Basing on the analysis of the concept of Global Value Chains (GVCs) and the substance of related theoretical categories, the author gives his own vision of the place that the Trade in Value Added (TiVA) concept occupies in the modern economic theory. It is pointed out that various approaches to the definition of value added, global chains, global value added chains, global import intensity, and other terms appeared recently. The author focuses on the problem of double-counting of intermediary goods (that leads to overstatement of the importance of trade) and on the estimations of the differences between exports in value added terms (so-called domestic value added embodied in foreign final demand) and gross exports. Such discrepancies reach as much as 25% of gross flows. Special attention is paid to the use of the World Input–Output Database (WIOD) in the analysis of the international trade. Its usefulness is illustrated by applying it to both intermediate goods and final products of Russian manufacturing exports. The author agrees with those economists who believe that conceptual framework of international trade in value added has been enhanced in the latest decade. Following Koopman et al. (2010) it is shown that a country’s exported value added can be broken down into three large components, including domestic value added, returned domestic value added and foreign value added. The author’s conclusion is as follows: Global Value Chains should not be regarded in themselves. They appear only where their total benefits exceed their total costs including transactional and other costs.
Keywords: international trade, value added, exports, imports, global value chains, Trade in Value Added (TiVA)
REFERENCES
1. Shishkov Y.V. Internatsionalizatsiya proizvodstva – novyi etap razvitiya mirovoi ekonomiki [Production Internationalization – New Stage of Development of the World Economy] Moscow, IMEMO, 2009. 92 p. Available at: http://www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/publ/2009/09021.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
2. Kondrat’ev V.B. Mirovaya ekonomika kak sistema global’nykh tsepochek stoimosti [Global Economy as Global Value Chains]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2015, no. 3, pp. 5-17. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_23213796_48159310.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
3. Guide to Measuring Global Production. New York and Geneva. UNECE. 2015. 227 ð. Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/2015/Guide_to_Measuring_Global_Production__2015_.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
4. Guide to Measuring Global Production. New York and Geneva, UNECE. 2016. 195 p. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/2016/Guide_to_Measuring_Global_Production_-_RU.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
5. System of National Accounts 2008. New York, UN, 2012. 764 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://unstats.un.org/Unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008Russian.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
6. System of National Accounts 2008. New York, UN, 2009. 662 ð. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/Unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
7. Volgina N.A. Makroekonomicheskaya zavisimost’ v epokhu global’nykh tsepochek stoimosti [Macroeconomic Dependence in the Era of Global Value Chains]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya Ekonomika, 2016, no. 4, pp. 133-139. Available at: http://journals.rudn.ru/economics (accessed 03.06.2017).
8. Meshkova T.A., Moiseichev E.Ya. Mirovye tendentsii razvitiya global’nykh tsepochek sozdaniya dobavlennoi stoimosti i uchastie v nikh Rossii [Global Value Chains: World Trends and Russia’s Involvement]. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta, 2015, no. 1, pp. 83-96.
9. Pobyvaev S.A. Global’nye tsepochki stoimosti i ikh potentsial’naya rol’ v razvitii rossiisko-belorusskoi integratsii [Global Value Chains and Their Potential Role in the Development of Russian-Belarusian Integration]. Mir novoi ekonomiki, 2016, no. 4, pp. 41-50.
10. Kalinski R. Rasprostranenie polozhitel’nogo vliyaniya globalizatsii. Kakie vyvody mozhno sdelat’ na osnovanii analiza tsepochki nakopleniya stoimosti? [Spreading the Gains of Globalisation: What Can be Learned from Value Chains Analysis]. Moscow, GU VShJe. 68 p.
11. Kirichenko E.V., ed. SShA: vozmozhnosti i predely ekonomicheskogo i politicheskogo liderstva. Tom 1 [USA: Opportunities and Limits of Economic and Political Leadership. Vol. 1]. Moscow, IMEMO, 2016. 240 p. Available at: http://www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/publ/2016/2016_041.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
12. Muradov K.Y. Vstroena li Rossiya v global’nye tsepochki sozdaniya stoimosti? [Is Russia Involved in Global Value Chains?]. Vestnik NSUEM, 2015, no. 4, pp. 92-117.
13. Sokolov V.V. Mezhdunarodnye proizvodstvennye tsepochki: uchet vklada stran v sozdanie dobavlennoy stoimosti [Global Value Chains: Accounting for the Participation of Individual Countries in the Creation of Value Added]. Russian foreign economic bulletin, 2016, no. 2, pp. 48-59. Available at: http://www.rfej.ru/rvv/id/E00345846/$file/48-59.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
14. Global Value Chains: Challenges, Opportunities and Implications for Policy. OECD, WTO, World Bank Group. 2014. 53 ð. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/tad/gvc_report_g20_july_2014.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
15. Timmer M.P., Dietzenbacher E., Los B., Stehrer R., de Vries G.J. An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production. Review of International Economics, 2015, vol. 23, pp. 575-605. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/roie.12178/full (accessed 03.06.2017).
16. Idrisova V.V., Litvinova Y.O. Torgovlya dobavlennoi stoimost’yu: empiricheskii analiz [Trade in Value Added: Empirical Analysis]. Russian foreign economic bulletin, 2016, no. 8, pp. 49-66. Available at: http://www.rfej.ru/rvv/id/700522136/%24file/49-66.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
17. Muradov K.Y. Rossiya – ASEAN: Torgovlya i global’nye proizvodstvennye tsepochki [Russia–ASEAN: Trade and Global Value Cains]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2015, no. 8, pp. 25-39.
18. G20 Leaders’ Declaration. 6 September 2013, 27 p. Available at: http://en.g20russia.ru/documents/ (accessed 03.06.2017).
19. Koopman R., Powers W., Wang Z., Wei S.-J. Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains. NBER Working Paper, 2010, no. 16426. 58 ð. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w16426.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
20. Global Value Chains and Development: Investment and Value Added Trade in Global Economy. A Preliminary Analysis. Geneva, UNCTAD, 2013. 32 p. Available at: http://unctad.org/en/publicationslibrary/diae2013d1_en.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
21. Trade in Value Added (TiVA) Database: December 2016. Available at: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=TIV0A_2016_C2 (accessed 03.06.2017).
22. Porter M.E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York, The Free Press, London, Collier Macmillan, 1985. 557 ð.
23. Gereffi G., Korzeniewicz M., eds. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, Praeger, 1994. 352 p. Available at: https://www.questia.com/library/2963265/commodity-chains-and-global-capitalism (accessed 03.06.2017).
24. Gereffi G., Humphrey J., Sturgeon T. The Governance of Global Value Chains. Review of International Political Economy, 2005, no. 12 (1), pð. 78-104. Available at: http://www.soc.duke.edu/sloan_2004/Papers/governance_of_gvcs_final.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
25. Gereffi G., Fernandez-Stark K. Global Value Chain Analysis: A Primer. Durham, Duke University, 2016. 34 ð. Available at: https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/handle/10161/12488 (accessed 03.06.2017).
26. Hummels D., Rapoport D., Yi K.-M. Vertical Specialization and the Changing Nature of World Trade. Economic Policy Review, June 1998, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 79-99. Available at: https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/1998/EPRvol4no2.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
27. Grossman G.M., Rossi-Hansberg E. Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring. NBER Working Paper, 2006, no. 12721. 36 ð. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w12721 (accessed 03.06.2017).
28. Trade in Value-Added: Concepts, Methodologies and Challenges (Joint OECD-WTO Note). Paris, OECD, Geneva, WTO, 2012. 28 p. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/49894138.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
29. Key Statistics and Trends in International Trade 2015. Geneva, UNCTAD, 2016. 30 ð. Available at: http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ditctab2015d1_en.pdf (accessed 03.07.2017)
30. World Input-Output Database: Intercountry Input-Output Table 2014. Available at: http://www.wiod.org/database/wiots16 (accessed 03.06.2017).
31. Baldwin R., Robert-Nicoud F. Trade-in-goods and Trade-in-tasks: An Integrating Framework. NBER Working Paper, 2010, no. 15882. 30 p. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15882.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
32. Bergstrand J.H., Egger P. The Growth of FDI Relative to Trade: Measurement, Determinants, and Consequences of International Trade Flows in Intermediates. University of Notre Dame. 2008. 52 p. Available at: http://www.jhubc.it/FULLEVENTCAL/UPLOADFILE2/Bergstrand%20Paper.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
33. Miroudot S., Lanz R., Ragoussis A. Trade in intermediate goods and services. Trade Policy Working Paper. 2009, no. 93. 66 ð. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/trade/its/44056524.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
34. Value Chains and the Cluster Approach. Transforming Relationships to Increase Competitiveness and Focus on End Markets. Washington, USAID, 2008. 14 p. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADP044.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
35. Nelson V., Martin A., Ewert J., Hasan A.A., Opondo M., Flint M., Hartog M., Priebe J. Trade and Global Value Chains Initiative: Mid Term Evaluation Report. Chatham, University of Greenwich, UKAID. 2016. 142 ð. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/563260/Trade-Global-Value-Chains-Initiative-mid-tern-eval.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
36. Timmer M.P., Los B., Stehrer R., de Vries G.J. An Anatomy of the Global Trade Slowdown Based on the WIOD2016 Release. Groningen, University of Groningen. GGDC Research Memorandum. Number 162. 2016. 65 p. Available at: http://www.ggdc.net/publications/memorandum/gd162.pdf (accessed 03.06.2017).
Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX
No comments