The Evolution of the Political Agenda Setting Concept in Foreign Political Studies

634
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-4-91-99
E. Vandysheva (evandysheva@hse.ru),
National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg Division, 16, Soyuza Pechatnikov Str., St. Petersburg 190008, Russian Federation

 



Abstract

The article shows which way the views on the first stage of the policy process, the agenda setting, have been developed in political science. The author discusses different approaches to the political agenda definition including governmental and decision agendas, systemic and institutional agendas, symbolic and substantial agendas. Different ways to indicate this kind of agenda focusing on parliamentary agenda are also highlighted. Examples of indicators used by political scientists include parliamentary questions, parliamentary debates or hearings, parliamentary inquiries and legislative initiatives. Moreover, this paper provides an overview of factors deemed to be the most important for the development of an agenda-setting research and the key direction of academic literature in this field. The article contains a critique of the main agenda-setting conceptual models. The current conceptual trends of this approach are outlined, which includes the break with American-based agenda-setting theory, the spread of comparative analysis, the development of quantitatively oriented policy methods, and the increase in policy dynamics research. The relationship between mass media and political agenda, political parties’ influence on the political agenda are also highlighted in the latest empirical studies. Different viewpoints on the media impact are shown: media as a source of their own agenda, media as a resource for promotion of separate issues, and media as a tool of influence over the agendas of political actors. The results are based on an analysis of few research projects that were represented in Web of Science publications with the highest citation index. Publications were selected by using the topic “Agenda Setting” in the category “Political Science”, without selection of a definite time period. Statistics of co-citation were analysed and a co-citation map was created by dint of the VOSviewer computer program. 


Keywords

policy agenda-setting, parliament agenda 


REFERENCES

1. Baumgartner F.R., Green-Pedersen C., Jones B.D. Comparative Studies of Policy Agendas. Journal of European Public Policy, 2006, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 959-974. DOI:10.1080/13501760600923805

2. Bachrach P., Baratz M.S. Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review, 1962, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 947-952.

3. Bachrach P., Baratz M.S. Decisions and Nondecisions: an Analytical Framework. The American Political Science Review, 1963, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 632-642.

4. Bachrach P., Baratz M. S. Power and Poverty. New York, Oxford University Press, 1970. 220 p.

5. Dahl R. A. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1956. 155 p.

6. Truman D. B. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York, A. Knopf, 1951. 544 p.

7. Dewey J. How We Think. Boston, D. C. Heath & Co, 1910. 250 p.

8. Dewey J. The Public and Its Problems: an Essay in Political Inquiry. New York, H. Holt and Company, 1927. 224 p.

9.  Torgerson D. Policy Analysis and Public Life: The Restoration of Phronesis? Farr J., Dryzek J.S., Leonard S.T., eds. Political Science in History: Research Programs and Political Traditions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 225-252.

10. Turnbull N. Harold Lasswell’s “Problem Orientation” for the Policy Sciences. Critical Policy Studies, 2008, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 72-91. DOI:10.1080/19460171.2008.9518532

11. Lasswell H.D. A Pre-view of Policy Sciences. New York, American Elsevier Pub. Co., 1971. 173 р.

12. Dahl R. A. A Critique of the Ruling-Elite Model. The American Political Science Review, 1958, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 463-469.

13. Schattschneider E.E. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960. 147 p.

14. Kingdon J. W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York, HarperCollins College Publishers, 1995. 254 p.

15. Downs A. Up and Down with Ecology – the Issue Attention Cycle. The Public Interest, 1972, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 39-50.

16. Sinclair B. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman, University of Oklahoma Press, 2006. 424 p.

17. Cobb R. W., Elder C.D. The Politics of Agenda-Building: an Alternative Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory. The Journal of Politics, 1971, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 892-915.

18. Princen S., Rhinard M. Crashing and Creeping: Agenda-Setting Dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 2006, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1119-1132. DOI:10.1080/13501760600924233

19. Van Aelst P.V., Thesen G., Walgrave S., Vliegenthart R. Mediatization and the Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Influence. Esser F., Strömbäck J., eds. Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Available at: http://ps.au.dk/fileadmin/Statskundskab/Billeder/Forskning/Forskningsprojekter/POLIS/Documents/Mediatization_chapter.pdf (accessed 12.05.2016).

20. Black R.C., Boyd C.L. Selecting the Select Few: the Discuss List and the U. S. Supreme Court’s Agenda-Setting Process. Social Science Quarterly, 2013, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 1124-1144. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00933.x

21. McGuire K.T., Caldeira G. A. Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court. The American Political Science Review, 1993, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 717-726. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2938746

22. Walgrave S., Van Aelst P. The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power. Towards a Preliminary Theory. Journal of Communication, 2006, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 88-109. DOI:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x

23. Vliegenthart R., Walgrave S. Content Matters: the Dynamics of Parliamentary Questioning in Belgium and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies, 2011, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1031-1059. DOI:10.1177/0010414011405168.

24. Melenhorst L. The Media’s Role in Lawmaking: a Case Study Analysis. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 2015, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 297-316. DOI:10.1177/1940161215581924

25. Jones B.D., Baumgartner F.R. Representation and Agenda Setting. Policy Studies Journal, 2004, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1-24. DOI:10.1111/j.0190-292X.2004.00050.x

26. Quinn K.M., Monroe B.L., Crespin M.H., Radev D.R. How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs. American Journal of Political Science, 2010, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 209-228. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00427.x

27. Helfer L. Media Effects on Politicians: an Individual-Level Political Agenda-Setting Experiment. The International Journal of Press/Politics, no. 21 (2), February 2016, pp. 233-252 Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ pdf/10.1177/1940161215627461 (accessed 22.12.2016). DOI:10.1177/1940161215627461

28. Soroka S. N. Issue Attributes and Agenda-Setting by Media, the Public and Policymaking in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2002, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 264-285. DOI:10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264

29. Soroka S.N. Policy Agenda-Setting Theory Revisited: a Critique of Howlett on Downs, Baumgartner and Jones, and Kingdon. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1999, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 763-772. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000842390001698X

30. Jones B.D., Baumgartner F.R. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2005. 304 p.

31. Green-Pedersen C. The Conflict of Conflicts in Comparative Perspective: Euthanasia as a Political Issue in Denmark, Belgium, and the Netherlands. Comparative Politics, 2007, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 273-291.

32. McCombs M.E., Shaw D.L. The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 1972, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 176-187.

33. Green-Pedersen C., Stubager R. The Political Conditionality of Mass Media Influence: When Do Parties Follow Mass Media Attention? British Journal of Political Science, 2010, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 663-677. DOI:i:10.1017/S0007123410000037

34. Protess L.D., Cook F.L., Curtin T.R., Gordon M.T., Leff D.R., McCombs M.E., Miller P. The Impact of Investigative Reporting on Public Opinion and Policymaking Targeting Toxic Waste. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1987, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 166-185. DOI:10.1086/269027

35. Van Noije L., Kleinnijenhuis J., Oegema D. Loss of Parliamentary Control due to Mediatization and Europeanization: A Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Analysis of Agenda Building in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. British Journal of Political Science, 2008, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 455-478. DOI:10.1017/S0007123408000239

36. Boydstun A.E., Hardy A., Walgrave S. Two Faces of Media Attention: Media Storm versus Non-Storm Coverage. Political Communication, 2014, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 509-531. DOI:10.1080/10584609.2013.875967

37. Andeweg R., Thomassen J. Pathways to Party Unity: Sanctions, Loyalty, Homogeneity and Division of Labour in the Dutch Parliament. Party Politics: The International Journal for the Study of Political Parties and Political Organizations, 2011, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 655-672. DOI:10.1177/1354068810377188 


Text 

Registered in system SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Vandysheva E. The Evolution of the Political Agenda Setting Concept in Foreign Political Studies. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2017, vol. 61, No 4, pp. 91-99. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-4-91-99



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed
 
Current Issue
2021, vol. 65, No. 1
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Globalization and Nation-State: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow
  • Global Value Chains (GVCS) and COVID 19 Pandemic
  • Middle East Conflicts Today: Between Religion and Geopolitics
  • Beijing’s Pain Points – 2 (Glance from Mid 2020)
  • Social Sciences and Global Turbulence: Rebooting the Mainstream
View This Issue (2021, vol. 65, No. 1)
Submit an Article
Announcement

Dear readers!
Please note that free access to full-text issues of the Journal is being opened at our WEB-site after 6 months of the date of publications.The work on deepening the open archive of full-text issues will be continued.


Dear colleagues, authors and readers!
We kindly request you to turn to editor-in-chief and executive secretary directly concerning reviewing scientific publications in our journal. Only editor-in-chief takes decision on order and publication the reviews!

Dear readers!
This is to inform the researchers of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations that electronic versions of the I, II, III issues of 2020 of French magazine Politique étrangère are now available. Those who are interested, please personally address to the editorial staff of MEMO Journal (room 18-17) with an electronic media.
NEW SECTION

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.

“Civilization processes of modern development” is a new rubric opened by MEMO Journal in 2020. It will be devoted to the analysis of the influence of civilizational factors and inter-civilizational interactions on the political and socio-economic development of the world at whole, regions and countries.

“Africa today and tomorrow”The rubric devoted to contemporary issues of Africa which is attracting growing interest of the world's leading actors. We plan to publish the articles analyzing the status of statehood, socio-economic and political development of the countries of Black continent, as well as the integration processes between them.

CONTEST!

"World Eсonomy and International Relations" announces a contest for the best joint academic publications of domestic and foreign researchers and experts in topical issues of the world economy and international relations. The winners will be selected according to the results of peer reviewing and discussion at the Editorial Board. The articles will be published in priority order.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE JOURNAL

The print version of “World Economy and International Relations” journal is distributed by advance subscription only, and is not offered for retail sale. To subscribe please address to any post office in Russia by referring to the Federal Postal Service Union Catalogue, section “ARSMI”, the journal index is 70542. The subscription may be made for the whole subscription period or starting from any nearest available month for desired number of issues.

To purchase the full-text electronic version of the journal’s issue/article please address to the WEB portal of Scientific electronic library eLIBRARY.ru or URL: https://press.gaugn.ru/.

In journal
Years
2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |

The author’s opinions may not coincide with the position of editorial