Paradox of Resource Curse: Cross-Country Analysis

957
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-3-25-35
V. Sadovskaya (sad-leriks@yandex.ru),
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SD RAS. 17, Academician Lavrentiev Prosp., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation; 
V. Shmat (petroleum-zugzwang@yandex.ru),

Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering SD RAS. 17, Academician Lavrentiev Prosp., Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation 

Abstract. The problem of the influence of the resources on the economic growth is dualistic. On the one hand, the abundance of resources is a factor favoring socio-economic development of the countries and territories. On the other hand, there were preconditions for the occurrence and strengthening of the effect of the dependence on resources. The dependence on resources in its extreme form is expressed in the effect of the resource curse. The resource curse problem has been studied for more than two decades. During this time researchers have created a set of econometric models, with the help of which the effect of resources and other factors (primarily – institutes) on the economic growth has been evaluated. But most of these studies were carried out for the period of 1970–1980’s, when there was a slowdown in the economic growth in major oil-exporting countries. This fact was the basis for the extension of the resource curse thesis. Despite the apparent persuasiveness and conclusiveness, this thesis has been challenged by many researchers. The failure of the resource curse theory was even more obvious in the 1990’s and 2000’s. This explains the relevance of modern cross-country econometric studies which were carried out by the authors. It is also necessary to correct the views on the resource factor. It is important to distinguish between a resource availability factor and a factor of resource dependence, that do not always exist together and that have a different impact on economic growth. The article presents the results of the cross-country econometric studies of the effects of resource supply and resource dependency, coupled with the influence of institutional factors. Analysis was carried out about the likely consequences in terms of economic growth. And the situation taking place in Russian economy was estimated. The overall conclusion is that resources themselves cannot be a curse, and only the excessive resource dependence has a negative effect on the economy. Specific risks and increased uncertainty are essential in the development of a resource-based economy. These conclusions are relevant for many countries including Russia. 

Keywords: natural resources, resource abundance, resource dependence, economic growth, “resource curse”, “Dutch disease”, institutions 


REFERENCES

1. Guriev S., Sonin K. Ekonomika “resursnogo proklyatiya” [Economics of the Resource Curse]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2008, no. 4, pp. 61-74.

2. Auty R. M. Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies: The Resource Curse Thesis. New York, Routlege, 1993. 272 p.

3. Gelb A. and associates. Oil Windfalls: Blessing or Curse? New York, World Bank/Oxford University Press, 1988. 357 p.

4. Sachs J.D., Warner A.M. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper no. 5398. Cambridge, MA, 1995. 47 p. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w5398 (accessed 22.02.2016).

5. Kartashov G. Ekonomicheskii rost i kachestvo institutov resursozavisimykh stran [Economic Growth and Institutional Quality in Resource Oriented Countries]. Quantile, 2007, no. 2, pp. 141-157.

6. Mehlum H., Moene K., Torvick R. Institutions and the Resource Curse. The Economic Journal, 2006, vol. 116, no. 508, pp. 1-20.

7. Gaidar E.T. Gibel’ imperii. Uroki dlya sovremennoi Rossii [Collapse of an Empire. Lessons for Modern Russia]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2006. 448 p.

8. Polterovich V.M., Popov V.V., Tonis A.S. Ekonomicheskaya politika, kachestvo institutov i mekhanizmy “resursnogo proklyatiya” [Economic Policy, Quality of Institutions, and Mechanisms of Resource Curse]. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2007. 98 p.

9. How to Cover Oil-Related Issues. New York, Open Society Institute, 2005. 183 p. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.resourcegovernance.org/sites/default/files/RWI_coveringoil_ru.pdf (accessed 22.02.2016).

10. Shmat V.V. Resursnyi natsionalizm: uroki Tret’ego mira [The “Resource Curse”: Lessons of the Third World]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2015, no. 1, pp. 28-39.

11. Illarionov’s Curse. Natural Resources Came into Conflict with Government Resources. Moscow, HSE, 06.04.2007 (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.hse.ru/news/1163633/1142505.html (accessed 22.02.2016).

12. Illarionov A. Neresursnoe proklyatie (onlain-interv’yu) [Non-Resource Curse]. 22.04.2008. Available at: http://www.iea.ru/econom_rost.php?id=25 (accessed 22.02.2016).

13. Alexeev M., Condrad R. The Elusive Curse of Oil. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2009, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 586-598.

14. Gylfason T. Natural Resources and Economic Growth: from Dependence to Diversification (Discussion Paper no. 4804). London, Center for Economic Policy Research, 2004. 33 p. Available at: https://notendur.hi.is/gylfason/pdf/DP4804.pdf (accessed 22.02.2016).

15. Gylfason T. The International Economics of Natural Resources and Growth (CESifo Working Paper No. 1994). Munich, CESifo Group, 2007. 20 p. Available at: http://www.cesifo-group.de/portal/pls/portal/docs/1/1187642.pdf (accessed 22.02.2016).

16. Leamer E. E., Maul H., Rodriguez S., Schott P. K. Does Natural Resource Abundance Increase Latin American Income Inequality? Journal of Development Economics, 1999, no. 59, pp. 3-42.

17. Haber S., Menaldo V. Do Natural Resources Fuel Authoritarianism? A Reappraisal of the Resource Curse. American Political Science Review, 2011, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 1-26.

18. Suslov N. I. Effektivnost’ ispol’zovaniya renty i kachestvo institutov v stranakh mira [Rent Use Efficiency and Quality of Institutions in the World Economies]. ECO, 2015, no. 8, pp. 103-119.

19. Grinets I. A., Kaznacheev P. F. Ekonomicheskii rost i institutsional’noe razvitie v neftegazovykh stranakh [Economic Growth and Institutional Development in Oil and Gas Countries]. ECO, 2015, no. 4, pp. 105-115.

20. Sadovskaya V. O., Shmat V. V. “Tsifromaniya” resursnogo “neproklyatiya” [“Digital-Mania” of the Resource “Non-Curse”]. ECO, 2015, no. 4, pp. 116-127.

21. Shmat V. Neftegazovyi tsugtsvang. Ocherki ekonomicheskikh problem rossiiskogo neftegazovogo sektora [Petroleum Zugzwang. Essays on the Economic Problems of the Russian Oil and Gas Sector]. Kryukov V. A., ed. Novosibirsk, IEIE SB RAS, 2014. 524 p.

22. World Bank Open Data. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator (accessed 22.02.2016).

23. The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015. World Economic Forum. Available at: http://www.weforum.org/reports/global-competitiveness-report-2014-2015 (accessed 22.02.2016).

24. Corruption Perception Index 2014. Transparency International. Available at: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014 (accessed 22.02.2016).

25. Economic Freedom of the World: 2015 Annual Report. Fraser Institute, 2015 Available at: http://www.freetheworld.com/datasets_efw.html (accessed 22.02.2016).

26. Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: 2004–2013. Global Financial Integrity, 2015. Available at: http://www.gfintegrity.org/report/illicit-financial-flows-from-developing-countries-2004-2013 (accessed 22.02.2016).

27. Kareva D. E., Shmat V. V. Budushchee rossiiskoi ekonomiki glazami “ottsov” i “detei” [The Future of the Russian Economy in the Eyes of “Fathers” and “Sons”]. ECO, 2014, no. 9, pp. 86-105. 


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Sadovskaya V., Shmat V. Paradox of Resource Curse: Cross-Country Analysis. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2017, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 25-35. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-3-25-35



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 7
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • The Supporting Structure of Global Security
  • Institutional Features of the Fourth Energy Transition
  • The Evolution of Modern German Christian Democracy
  • The Monarchies of the Persian Gulf and Central Asia
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.