Print

Development of the U.S. Green Movement: Reliance on Civil Society

513
Rubric: USA: Politics and Society
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-11-43-56

T. Rovinskaya (mirtania@gmail.com),
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation 

PDF (RUS)

Abstract
The article thoroughly analyses the history of the American Environmentalism as a socio-political movement and follows the evolvement of the early elitist Conservationist Movement into a mass Green Movement based on public participation. The importance of Conservationist principles in the U.S. state policy greatly increased during the first half of the 20th century, especially during the Progressive Era under the first President-conservationist Theodore Roosevelt (1901-1909). The economic revival after the Great Depression of 1929-1933 included development of environmental and tourist infrastructure with mass participation of the civil society. However, the contemporary U.S. Green Movement was formed during and right after the World War II, as a natural consequence of the smart policy pursued by the President Franklin Delano Roosevelt as part of his “New Deal” course. By 1970-1980s, it already included three directions: the traditional Wilderness Preservation, the Anti-Nuclear Movement and a combination Anti-Toxic Movement/Environmental-Justice Movement (known as NYMBY). Special attention is paid to its basic forms — the environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and Green political parties. It is concluded that the variety of environmental NGOs — older and newer, national and local, information- and agitation-oriented, advocacy practicing and political lobbyists, etc. — are grassroots of the environmental movement in the U.S., mobilizing civil support and creating an electoral base for Green political parties both at the state and federal level. The author investigates their present condition and perspectives, strategy and tactics of their social and political activities. At present, the popularity of “green ideas” in the American society is still inadequate for the Green Party USA to provide a real competition with the two main political parties — Democratic and Republican — at the federal level, even in view of its social-democratic orientation. However, “The Greens” are successful at the local level. Popularization of “green ideas”, mobilization of followers among the civil society, environmental legislation lobbying and strengthening of the environmental justice system currently remain the main tactics of American environmental organizations.

Keywords

Conservationist Movement, Green Movement, environmental NGOs, local environmental groups, Green Party USA, elections, Green New Deal 


REFERENCES

1. Stephen R. The American Conservation Movement: John Muir and His Legacy. Madison, University of Visconsin Press, 1985. 436 p. Available at: https://books.google.ru/books?id=kV1_k5vSuOMC&pg=PA107&redir_esc=y&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed 05.02.2017).

2. Pinchot G. Breaking New Ground. Washington D. C., Island Press, 1947. 523 p.

3. Maher N. M. Nature's New Deal: The Civilian Conservation Corps and the Roots of the American Environmental Movement. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007. 328 p.

4. Barry J., Frankland E. G. International Encyclopedia of Environmental Politics. London, New York, Routledge, 2001. 519 p.

5. Giugni M. Social Protest and Policy Change: Ecology, Antinuclear, and Peace Movements in Comparative Perspective. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 2004. 320 p.

6. Lindsey R. 438 Protesters are Arrested at Nevada Nuclear Test Site. The New York Times, 06.02.1987. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/1987/02/06/us/438-protesters-are-arrested-at-nevada-nuclear-test-site.html (accessed 05.02.2017).

7. Brown J., Brutoco R. Profiles in Power: The Anti-Nuclear Movement and the Dawn of the Solar Age. New York, Twayne Publishers, 1997. 249 p.

8. Gouldson A., Roberts P., eds. Integrating Environment and Economy. Strategies for Local and Regional Government. London, New York, Routledge, 2000. 304 p.

9. Silveira S. J. The American Environmental Movement: Surviving through Diversity. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, vol. 28, issue 2, 01.01.2004. Available at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1194&context=ealr (accessed 14.02.2017).

10. Martin D. Anne Gorsuch Burford, 62, Reagan E. P. A. Chief, Dies. The New York Times, 22.07.2016. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/22/us/anne-gorsuch-burford‑62-reagan-epa-chief-dies.html?_r=0 (accessed 14.02.2017).

11. Ratner B. N. 3 Reasons Trump's EPA Pick is Bad News for Business. Environmental Defense Fund. Available at: https://www.edf.org/blog/2016/12/19/3-reasons-trumps-epa-pick-bad-news-business (accessed 14.02.2017).

12. National Geographic Society. New World Encyclopedia. Available at: http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/National_Geographic_Society (accessed 05.02.2017).

13. English-Russian Dictionary of Regional Studies. 2013. Available at: http://regional_studies.academic.ru/12554/National_Geographic_Society (accessed 05.02.2017).

14. Kulyasov I. P. Ekologicheskaya modernizatsiya: teoriya i praktiki [Ecological Modernization: Theory and Practices]. Pakhomov Yu.N., ed. Sankt-Petersburg, NIIKh SPbGU, 2004. 154 p.

15. About Us. Audubon. Available at: http://www.audubon.org/about (accessed 02.02.2017).

16. International Alliances Program. Audubon. Available at: http://www.audubon.org/conservation/international (accessed 05.02.2017).

17. About Environmental Defense Fund. Environmental Defense Fund. Available at: https://www.edf.org/about (accessed 05.02.2017).

18. Our People. Environmental Defense Fund. Available at: https://www.edf.org/people (accessed 05.02.2017).

19. Cool It. Cleaning Up the Old Act. The Economist, 31.08.1991. Available at: http://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/11682_The_Economist_Cool_It.pdf (accessed 05.02.2017).

20. Revkin A. C. 7 Companies Agree to Cut Gas Emissions. The New York Times, 18.10.2000. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/18/business/7-companies-agree-to-cut-gas-emissions.html (accessed 05.02.2017).

21. Jack A. The Rankings: Trend to Partnerships is Positive. The Financial Times, 05.07.2007. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/e8db1bd6-294c-11dc-a530-000b5df10621 (accessed 05.02.2017).

22. Environmental Defense Fund. Charity Navigator. Available at: https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=3671 (accessed 05.02.2017).

23. Our Story: How EDF Got Started. Selected Milestones. Environmental Defense Fund. Available at: https://www.edf.org/about/ourhistory (accessed 05.02.2017).

24. About Us. NDRC. Available at: https://www.nrdc.org/about (accessed 05.02.2017).

25. A Year of Momentum. 2015 Annual Report. Available at: https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/nrdc-annual-report-2015.pdf (accessed 05.02.2017).

26. About the Environmental Law Institute. ELI. Available at: https://www.eli.org/about-environmental-law-institute (accessed 05.02.2017).

27. Mission. League of Conservation Voters. Available at: https://www.lcv.org/mission/ (accessed 05.02.2017).

28. League of Conservation Voters. Players Guide 2014. FastCheck.org, 13.02.2014. Available at: http://www.factcheck.org/2014/02/league-of-conservation-voters/ (accessed 05.02.2017).

29. Local Environmental Groups. Citizens’ Greener Evanston. Available at: http://greenerevanston.org/local-environmental-groups (accessed 05.02.2017).

30. The Bioregional Revolution. Encyclopedia. NationMaster.com. Available at: http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/The-Bioregional-Revolution (accessed 05.02.2017).

31. History. Green Party US. Available at: http://www.gp.org/history (accessed 05.02.2017).

32. Ten Key Values. The Greens. Available at: https://www.greenparty.org/values.php (accessed 05.02.2017).

33. 2016 Candidates. Green Party US. Available at: http://www.gp.org/2016_candidates (accessed 05.02.2017).

34. 2016 Presidential General Election Results. Available at: http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/ (accessed 01.02.2017).

35. Winger R., ed. New Voter Registration National Totals. Ballot Access News, 21.11.2016. Available at: http://ballot-access.org/2016/11/21/new-voter-registration-national-totals/ (accessed 05.02.2017).

36. Green New Deal. Green Party US. Available at: http://www.gp.org/green_new_deal (accessed 05.02.2017).

37. National Committee Voting. Green Party US. Available at: http://gp.org/cgi-bin/vote/propdetail?pid=835 (accessed 05.02.2017).

38. Compare U. S. Political Parties. Available at: http://us-political-parties.insidegov.com/ (accessed 01.02.2017). 


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Rovinskaya T. Development of the U.S. Green Movement: Reliance on Civil Society. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2017, vol. 61, No 11, pp. 43-56. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-11-43-56

Contents World Eñonomy and International Relations. 2017, vol. 61, No 11

Comments (0)

Show

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Current Issue
2022, vol. 66, No. 6
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  •  China on the Eve of the 20th CPC Congress 
  •  2020 Elections: “Stress Test” for American Federalism 
  •  The Chancellor O. Scholz’s Policy in the Context of Global Transformation 
  •  The EU China Policy in the Making: The Role of Central and Eastern Europe 
  •  Pan-European Political Space: From Idea to Reality
View This Issue (2022, vol. 66, No. 6)
Submit an Article
Submit an Article
NEW SECTION

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.