Energy Impact on Sustainable Development

602
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-11-34-42

S. Zhiznin, (s.zhiznin@rambler.ru),
MGIMO University 76, Prosp. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation;
V. Timokhov (vl.timokhov@gmail.com),
Center of Energy Diplomacy and Geopolitics (CED), 17, Gogolevskii Blvd., Moscow, 119019, Russian Federation 

 

Abstract. Energy production and consumption are the basis of economic and social development, climate changes, so the energy issues play a crucial role in sustainable development. Each energy source has its advantages and disadvantages in relation to sustainable development. Burning fossil fuels is the main cause of air pollution and the risk of climate change caused by human activity. The vast majority of energy produced falls on fossil fuels (about 86%) that leads to the release of large amounts of greenhouse gas particularly in oil and coal industries. The negative impact has leaks of the greenhouse gas methane if the natural gas is transported to the long distances. Interest in renewable energy sources (RES) has been steadily growing in the world and renewable energy make a significant contribution to the global energy balance. The disadvantage of RES is the instability of the energy produced by them, so the spare capacity is needed for its compensation, which, in most cases, is generated at conventional power plants by burning fossil fuels, mainly natural gas, which requires additional investment in capacity for both generation and transmission energy. The combination of renewable energy in conjunction with gas power plants for backup power, produce the greenhouse gas emissions, which can be compared with the stand-alone coal generating stations with the same generating capacity. Therefore, renewable energy sources do not completely satisfy the conditions for sustainable development. Nuclear energy has a competitive economy, a positive impact on climate change, which leads to the conclusion that in the future it may become the most attractive and affordable form of energy for sustainable development. At the same time, the share of nuclear power in the world energy production is low, its further development depends on a significant increase in investments in the new technologies that are not expected in the medium term. The most promising direction is the cooperation of traditional organic energy with its RES and nuclear option, which will contain a synergistic technology of organic energy and nuclear hydrogen production technology of water. In this approach, the world energy industry will be developing as a united complex, allowing the best use of each energy technology to secure the sustainable development for many years. 

Keywords: sustainable development, renewable energy, nuclear power, natural gas, oil, coal, carbon dioxide, greenhouse gas, climate change 


REFERENCES

1. Nuclear Energy in a Sustainable Development Perspective. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 2000. Available at: http://www.oecdnea.org/ndd/docs/2000/nddsustdev.pdf (accessed 22.10.2016).

2. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. Available at: http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/energyoutlook-2017/bp-energy-outlook-2017.pdf (accessed 07.04.2017).

3. Alvareza R. A., Pacala S. W., Winebrake J. J., Chameides W. L., Hamburg S. P. Greater Focus Needed on Methane Leakage from Natural Gas Infrastructure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 2012, vol. 109, no. 17, pp. 6435-6440. Available at: http://www.pnas.org/content/109/17/6435 (accessed 22.10.2016).

4. Pachauri R. K., Meyer L. A., eds. Greenhouse Gas Metrics and Mitigation Pathways. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, IPCC, 2014. 151 p. Available at: http://epic.awi.de/37530/1/IPCC_AR5_SYR_Final.pdf (accessed 22.10.2016).

5. What Is the Greenest Source of Electricity? Available at: http://shrinkthatfootprint.com/greenest-electricity-source (accessed 22.10.2016).

6. Howarth R. W., Santoro R., Ingraffea A. Methane and the Greenhouse-gas Footprint of Natural Gas from Shale Formations. Climate Change, 2011, vol. 106, pp. 679-690. DOI:10.1007/s10584-011-0061-5.

7. Fortov V. E., Popel' O. S. Energetika v sovremennom mire [Energetics in the Modern World]. Dolgoprudnyi, Publishing House "Intellect", 2011. 168 p.

8. Electricity Storage at Utility Scale. WNA. Renewable Energy and Electricity. Available at: http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/energy-and-the-environment/renewable-energy-and-electricity.aspx (accessed 25.11.2016).

9. Integrating Wind Power in the European Power Systems – Prerequisites for Successful and Organic Growth. Union for the Coordination of Transmission of Electricity (UCTE). May 2004. Available at: http://UCTE-integratingwindpower.pdf (accessed 25.11.2016).

10. Brook B. W., Alonso A., Meneley D. A., at al. Why Nuclear Energy Is Sustainable and Has to Be Part of the Energy Mix. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 2014, vol. 1-2, p. 8-16.

11. Average Power Plant Operating Expenses for U. S. Electric Utilities. U. S. Energy Information Administration. Available at: http://www.eia.gov/electricity (accessed 25.11.2016).

12. Uranium 2014: Resources, Production and Demand. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, International Atomic Energy Agency. Available at: http://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2014/7210-uranium-2014-es.pdf (accessed 25.11.2016).

13. Cohen B. L. Breeder Reactors — a Renewable Energy Source. American Journal of Physics, 1983, vol. 51. Available at: http://large.stanford.edu/publications/coal/references/docs/pad11983cohen.pdf (accessed 25.11.2016).

14. Lightfoot D., Manheimer W., Meneley D. A., Pendergast D., Stanford G. S. Nuclear Fission Fuel is Inexhaustible. Canadian Nuclear Society Climate Change Technology Conference. Ottawa, 2006, May 10-12. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.398.917&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 25.11.2016).

15. Velikhov E. P., Gagarinskii A. Iu., Subbotin S. A., Tsibul'skii V. F. Evoliutsiia energetiki v XXI veke [The Evolution of Energy in the XXIth Century]. Moscow, Atomic Engineering Publishing House, 2008. 160 p.

16. World Development Indicators 2015. Washington, World Bank, 2015. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/21634 (accessed 28.11.2016).

17. Conca J., Wright J. The Cost of a Sustainable Energy Future. Proceedings of the 2010 Waste Management Symposia, Phoenix, Arizona, Paper 10494, pp. 1-14. Available at: http://nuclearfuelcyclesummit.org/DocumentCenter/Home/View/120 (accessed 28.11.2016).

18. Kharecha P. A., Hansen J. E. Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, March 15, pp. 1-18. DOI:10.1021/es3051197. Available at: http://pubs.acs.org (accessed 28.11.2016).

19. Gabbard A. Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Review, 1993, vol. 26, no. 3-4, . 24-32.

20. Earth's Average Surface Temperature Has Risen about 2.0 Degrees Fahrenheit (1.1 Degrees Celsius). NASA. 18.01.2017. Available at: https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20170118/ (accessed 20.12.2016).

21. Kokorin A. O. Parizhskoe klimaticheskoe soglashenie OON: nyneshnee i budushchee vozdeistvie na ekonomiku Rossii i drugikh stran [The Paris of the UN Climate Agreement: The Present and Future Impact on the Economies of Russia and Other Countries] Available at: http://www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/conf/2016/11022016/11022016-PRZ-COCK.pdf; http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ru/about/climate-change/ (accessed 20.01.2017).

22. Contribution to Avoided GHG Emissions. Climate hange and Nuclear ower 2015. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2015. 122 .

23. Stukalov V. A., Subbotin S. A., Shchepetina T. D. Vodorodnaia energetika i tekhnogennyi vodorodnyi tsikl kak osnova konsolidirovannogo razvitiia toplivodobyvaiushchikh otraslei i atomnoi energetiki. [Hydrogen Energy and Technogenic Hydrogen Cycle as a Basis for Consolidated Development of Fuel Producing and Nuclear Energy Industries] Moscow, RNTS “Kurchatovskii institut”. Available at: http://isem.irk.ru/symp2010/papers/RUS/S3-09r.pdf (accessed 25.11.2016). 


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Zhiznin S., Timokhov V. Energy Impact on Sustainable Development. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2017, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 34-42. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-11-34-42



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 7
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • The Supporting Structure of Global Security
  • Institutional Features of the Fourth Energy Transition
  • The Evolution of Modern German Christian Democracy
  • The Monarchies of the Persian Gulf and Central Asia
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.