The Openness of National Economies: The World and Russia

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-10-5-15

V. Obolensky (,
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Science, 32, Nakhimovskiy Prosp., Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation;

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences, 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., 117997, Moscow, Russian Federation 

Abstract. The article deals with the process of building-up the openness of national economies – the liberalization of the international exchange of goods, services and capital – in its institutional and reproductive aspects. It outlines the main directions of this process related to the working out of multilateral agreements in respect to the universal rules of the regulation of the world trade and principles of the freedom of cross-border investments as well as of regional integrational agreements that reduce barriers in trade and investment cooperation between the participants. The author agrees that before the global crisis of 2008–2009 the economic openness really helped the intensification of the international exchange and the economic growth. However, in the post-crisis period there emerged the situation of so called “new normal”. It is featured by a number of fundamental negative factors (volatility at financial markets, sharp fluctuations of prices of the raw materials, low growth rates of the world trade and investments) that counter-balance the stimulating role of the liberalization. In this light, the author proposes a comparative analysis of the degree of the openness of the economy of Russia and of the economies of the leaders of the world trade, of the oil-exporting nations, as well as of countries with the comparable level of GDP per capita. A conclusion is drawn that, at present time, Russia is economically less open than the most developed countries and somewhat more open than the leading developing countries. It is pointed out that, despite the often declared commitment to the openness, in order to support domestic producers the government of Russia continues to apply to the protectionist measures that violate multilateral agreements. The author believes that, in the short term, it is unlikely that the openness of national economies can be further increased globally and that the protectionist trends can be resisted in the world. The degree of openness of the Russian economy may grow considerably only in the case of the achievement of multilateral agreements in the framework of the WTO round at Doha, however this looks rather problematic today. The conclusion by the EEU agreements of the free trade with a number of countries will not raise considerably the openness of the Russian economy. The openness may rise if the idea of the formation of the common economic space from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean, formulated earlier but illusory in the present international situation, will be realized. 

Keywords: economic openness, protectionism, Russian economy, perspectives 


1. Medvedev D.A. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii: obretenie novoi dinamiki [Social and Economic Development of Russia: New Dynamics Gained]. Voprosy economiki (Issues of Economics), 2016, no. 10, pp. 5-30.

2. World Trade Report 2011. WTO. 2011. 256 . Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

3. WTO’s Trade Facilitation Agreement Enters into Force. Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

4. Azevedo R. Regional Trade Agreements “Cannot Substitute” the Multilateral Trading System. Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

5. Regional Trade Agreements. Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

6. Trade and Tariffs. Geneva, WTO, 2015. 8 p. Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

7. UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics 2016. Geneva, UNCTAD, 2016. 264 p. Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

8. Bulatov A.S. Uchastie Rossii v mezhdunarodnom eksporte kapitala [The Participation of Russia in the International Export of Capital]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2012, no. 6, pp. 125-133.

9. IMF Data. International Financial Statistics (IFS). Balance of Payments Statistics and International Investment Position Statistics (BOPS/IIP). Summary of International Transactions. Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

10. World Investment Report 2016. General Tendencies and Overview 2016. 63 p. (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

11. Kadochnikov P.A., Knobel’ A. Yu., Sinel’nikov-Murylev S.G. Otkrytost’ rossiiskoi ekonomiki kak istochnik ekonomicheskogo rosta [The Openness of the Russian Economy as a Source of the Economic Growth]. Voprosy economiki (Issues of Economics), 2016, no. 12, pp. 26-42.

12. World Economic Outlook. April 2017. Washington, IMF, 2017. 227 p. Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

13. World Trade Statistical Review. Geneva, WTO, 2016. 163 p. Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

14. ommunique of the leaders of the Group of Twenty at the Summit in Chango (China). 05.09.2016 (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

15. Report on G20 Trade Measures. 10.11.2016. Geneva, WTO, 2016. 99 p. Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

16. World Tariff Profiles 2016. Geneva, WTO, 2016. 228 p. Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

17. Edovina T. Evraziya stoit svobodnoi torgovli [Eurasiais Worth of Free Trade]. Kommersant, 25.10.2016.

18. OECD FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index. Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017).

19. Lami P. Rossiyane smogut pokupat’ tovary deshevle [Russians Will Be Able to Buy Goods Cheeper]. Vedomosti, 27.06.2012.

20. First Report of the Trade Policy of Russia in WTO: The Task of the Integration of Russia in the World Trade System is fulfilled (In Russ.) Available at: (accessed 10.05.2017). 

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Obolenskiy V. The Openness of National Economies: The World and Russia. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2017, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 5-15.

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment






Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies


Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 5
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Are There Any Ways to Break Through the Korean Nuclear Impasse?
  • Contemporary U.S. Taiwan Policy: Balancing on the Edge
  • The Gulf Monarchies’ Vision of the Global Order Transformations and the Russian Place in It
  • At Post-Soviet Space
Submit an Article
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.