Machinery-Building Clusters and Transnational Corporations

568
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-8-53-62
V. Sokolov, Bank of Russia, 12, Neglinnaya Str., Moscow, 107016, Russian Federation (svv7@cbr.ru

Abstract

The article considers the problem of the trading and production links between the three regional machinery-building clusters and the role of the transnational corporations in the developing of these clusters. It is emphasized that the East Asian countries became the largest exporters of machinery and equipment compared with North America and European Union. The trade flows of machinery and equipment from East Asia to North America (NAFTA countries) and European Union are larger than the counter flows. The difference between the East Asian shipments to NAFTA and the North American shipments to East Asia is growing and the difference between the flows between the East Asia and European Union is diminishing. USA and NAFTA as a whole integration unit are net importers of machinery and equipment. But the North American machinery-building cluster is preserving technological leadership in this area. For example, the larger share of the parts and components used by the US computer industry is imported but the research and development services are mostly of domestic origin. The article shows that the main transnational corporations in the machinery-building are the corporations of the “old” developed countries. During four years (2010-2013) the list of the 100 largest non-financial TNCs of the world included persistently 15 machinery-building corporations: 5 from USA, 4 from Japan, 3 from Germany and one company from each of the following countries: France, Italy and Netherlands. The global machinery-building cluster is still dominated by companies from USA, Japan and Germany. The companies from South Korea and Taiwan appear in the list incidentally. The Chinese companies are absent in the list. So the East Asian machinery-building cluster is still directed by the companies based outside the continental producing countries. The Asian corporations are trying to enhance their technological level.


Keywords

geoeconomics, machinery-building, cluster, international division of labor, global supply chains, trade flows, transnational corporations, investment, R&D 


REFERENCES

1. Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Arlington, National Science Foundation (NSB 14-01). Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/index.cfm/etc/pdf.htm (accessed 09.07.2015).

2. International Trade Statistics 2014. Geneva, 2014. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2014_e/its2014_e.pdf (accessed 09.07.2015).

3. The International Organization of Motor Vehicles Manufacturers (OICA). Production Statistics. Available at: www.oica.net/category/production statistics/2009-statistics/; 2010-statistics; 2011-statistics; 2012-statistics (accessed 14.01.2014); 2013-statistics (accessed 08.05.2015).

4. Sokolov V. Mashinostroitel'nye klastery v mezhdunarodnom razdelenii truda [Mechanical Engineering Clusters in International Division of Labor]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2013, no. 5, pp. 31-40.

5. Sokolov V. Vostochnoaziatskii mashinostroitel'nyi klaster [East Asia Machinery-Building Cluster]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2014, no. 4, pp. 36-44.

6. Porter M. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1990. 855 p.

7. Comtrade. Available at: http://comtrade.un.org/db/dqBasicQueryResults.aspx?cc=7&px=S4&r=842&y=2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008&p=156(344, 392, 410, 458, 608, 702, 764)&rq=1,2&co=8&qt=n; http://comtrade.un.org/db/dqBasicQueryResults.aspx?cc=7&px=S4&r=124&y=2013,2012,2011,2010,2009,2008&p=156(344,392,410,458,608,702,764)&rq=1,2&co=8&qt=n; http://comtrade.un.org/db/dqBasicQueryResults.aspx?cc=7&px=S4&r=484&y=2013,2012,2011,2010,2009,2008&p=156(344,392,410,458,608,702,764)&rq=1,2&co=8&qt=n; http://comtrade.un.org/db/dqBasicQueryResults.aspx?cc=7&px=S4&r=97&y=2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009,]2008&p=156(344,392,410,458,608,702, 764)&rq=1,2&co=8&qt=n; http://comtrade.un.org/db/dqBasicQueryResults.aspx?cc=7&px=S4&r=97&y=2013,2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008&p=842(124,484)&rq=1,2&co=8&qt=n (àccessed 17.06.2015; 08.07.2015).

8. Varnavskii V.G. Global’naya konkurentosposobnost’ obrabatyvayushchei promyshlennosti USA [Global Competitiveness of the US Manufacturing]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2015, no. 2, pp. 34-46.

9. Sokolov V.V. Mezhdunarodnye proizvodstvennye tsepochki v ATR [International Supply Chains in APR]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2015, no. 3, pp. 48-55.

10. OECD Database. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/industry/ind/input-outputtableslatesteditionaccesstodata.htm (accessed 13.03.2014).

11. The Process of Localization in America Machinery-Building (In Russ.). BIKI, 20.12.2012, no. 146.

12. Edovina T. Proizvoditeli prodolzhayut vozvrashchat'sya v USA [The Producers Continue to Return into USA]. Kommersant, 23.10.2014.

13. World Investment Report 2013. Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development. New York and Geneva, 2013. 236 p.

14. World Investment report 2015: Reforming International Investment Governance. New York and Geneva, 2015. 219 p., annex tables 20 p.

15. World Investment Report 2014. Investing in GDC: An Action Plan. New York and Geneva, 2014. 228 p.

16. Os’movà M.N., Boichenko A.V., eds. Globalizatsiya mirovogo khozyaistva [Globalization of the World Economy]. Moscow, INFRA-M, 2011. 375 p.

17. Spartak A.N. Rossiya v mezhdunarodom razdelenii truda: vybor konkurentosposobnoi strategii [Russia in International Division of Labor: The Choice of Competitive Strategy]. Moscow, MAKS Press, 2004. 524 p.

18. World Investment Report 2011: New Equity Modes of International Production and Development. New York and Geneva, UNCTAD, 2011. 226 p.

19. Hummels D., Rapoport D., Kei Mu-Yi. Vertical Specialization and the Changing Nature of the World Trade. FRBNY Economic Policy Review. June 1998, pp. 79-99.

20. World Investment Report 2012: Towards a New Generation of Investment Policies. New York and Geneva, UNCTAD, 2012. 204 p.

21. Ford Motor Company. Global Operations. Available at: http://corporate.ford.com/company/operation-list.htm#s0f0; http://corporate.ford.com/company/operation-list.htm#s0f1; http://corporate.ford.com/company/operation-list.htm#s0f2; http://corporate.ford.com/company/operation-list.htm#s0f3; http://corporate.ford.com/company/operationlist.htm#s0f4 (accessed 22.07.2015).

22. Kim Yoo-chul. Sony, Apple, Dell are Samsung big buyers. The Korea Times, 16.06.2010. Available at http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www.news.tech/2010/09/133 67730.html (accessed 17.06.2015).

23. Fedorovsky A.N. Gosudarstvo i krupnyi biznes vo vneshneekonomicheskikh svyazyakh Respubliki Koreya [State and Big Business in External Economic Relations of the Republic of Korea]. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2006. 101 p.

 


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Sokolov V. Machinery-Building Clusters and Transnational Corporations. World Eñonomy and International Relations, 2016, vol. 60, No 8, pp. 53-62. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-8-53-62



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Current Issue
2022, vol. 66, No. 6
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  •  China on the Eve of the 20th CPC Congress 
  •  2020 Elections: “Stress Test” for American Federalism 
  •  The Chancellor O. Scholz’s Policy in the Context of Global Transformation 
  •  The EU China Policy in the Making: The Role of Central and Eastern Europe 
  •  Pan-European Political Space: From Idea to Reality
View This Issue (2022, vol. 66, No. 6)
Submit an Article
NEW SECTION

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.