Development Assistance in Foreign Strategies of China, the Republic of Korea and Japan

479
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-12-82-91

A. Fedorovskii, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation (a.fedorovsk@imemo.ru),
K. Voda, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation (vodakris@gmail.com)

Abstract. The article focuses on new trends in development assistance strategies of three Northeast Asian countries: China, Japan and the Republic of Korea. It provides the analysis of key features of China’s contemporary foreign aid strategy which is currently based mainly on economic priorities rather than on ideology. Building on post-reform successes in economic development, Beijing is expanding its assistance to African and Asian countries, thus demonstrating the efficiency of China’s development model. Moreover, China implements foreign aid programs taking into account the individual recipient countries’ priorities and specific features of their economic and social development. The authors gave attention to Beijing’s willingness to use soft power tools for promoting aid programs. However, the active government involvement in formulation and implementation of foreign aid programs, as well as the predominance of commercial interests of Chinese businesses, are among the main characteristics which are negatively perceived by developing states. The article also explores Japan’s contemporary official development assistance (ODA) policies, which have been changing following the transformation of Japanese security and foreign strategy. Although Tokyo’s aid programs in industrial and social spheres are welcomed by developing countries, Japan’s pursuit towards the "normalization" of security and foreign policy is still viewed in some of recipient countries with caution. Although the scale of the Republic of Korea’s ODA is smaller compared to Japan’s and China’s foreign aid programs, its implementation has been relatively successful due to interaction between government, businesses and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Whereas in the case of China, rigid control of public activities by the government still hinders comprehensive and multifaceted development of Beijing’s assistance policies. Although the peculiarities of China’s legislature and political system make its foreign aid policies and practices different from Japan’s and Korea’s ODA policies, there are a number of common features. These include attention to developing countries’ priorities and peculiarities of their economic and political development, the acknowledgment of social responsibility of business, and the growing use of soft power tools. Given these circumstances, the collaboration on ODA projects is possible between China, Japan and the Republic of Korea. However, in some regions where the interests of these countries meet and contradict, for example, in Southeast Asia, there is a growing rivalry between Beijing, Tokyo and Seoul for presence and influence.

Keywords: official development assistance, China, Republic of Korea, Japan, Africa, Southeast Asia, support for economic growth, Beijing Consensus 


REFERENCES

1. China’s Foreign Aid (2014). Information Office of the State Council. The Republic of China. July 2014. Beijing. Available at: http://news.xinhuanet.com/English/china/2014-07/10/c_133474011.htm (accessed 07.07.2016).

2. Kato H., Page J., Shimomura Ya., eds. Japan’s Development Assistance. Foreign Aid and the Post-2015 Agenda. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 369 p.

3. Development Cooperation Charter. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan February 10, 2015. Available at: http://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000067701.pdf (accessed 24.03.2016).

4. ODA Policy on Human Security. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Available at: www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/sector/security/action.html (accessed 24.03.2016).

5. Borokh O.N. Rol' kul'tury v narashchivanii potentsiala “myagkoi sily” KNR [The Role of Culture in Capacity Building of “Soft Power” of China]. “Myagkaya sila” v otnosheniyakh Kitaya s vneshnim mirom [Soft Power in China's Relations with the Outside World]. Moscow, IFES RAS, 2015, pp. 62-111.

6. Strel'tsov D.V. Ofitsial'naya pomoshch' razvitiyu – vazhneishii instrument vneshnei politiki Yaponii [Japanese Official Development Assistance as a Crucial Foreign Policy Tool]. Vneshnyaya politika Yaponii: istoriya i sovremennost'. Uchebnoe posobie [Japanese Foreign Policy. Tutorial]. Moscow. Vostochnaya literatura publ., 2008, pp. 257-277. 

7. Potter D. Japan’s Official Development Assistance. Kim Hyo-Sook, Potter D., eds. Foreign Aid Competition in Northeast Asia. Sterling (Virginia), Stylus Publishing, 2012, . 13-36.  

8. Anisimtsev N.V. Ispolnitel'naya vlast' Yaponii na rubezhe vekov: sistema i evolyutsiya [Japanese Executive Power at the Turn of the Century: System and Evolution]. Moscow, IFES RAS, 2008. 255 p.

9. Nguen Tkhi Fyong Khoa. Rost “myagkoi sily” Kitaya v svete “vykhoda vovne” [The Rise of China’s Soft Power as a Part of the ‘Go to the Outside’ Strategy]. “Myagkaya sila” v otnosheniyakh Kitaya s vneshnim mirom [Soft Power in China's Relations with the Outside World]. Moscow, IFES RAS, 2015, pp. 184-206.

10. Chzhan Yun'lin. Ekonomicheskii poyas Shelkovogo puti: videnie Kitaya. [Silk Road Economic Belt: China’s Vision] Available at: aprcenter.ru/images/rus-nccapr-apecs-2016-1-lite-05zhangyunlin.pdf (accessed 07.07.2016). 

11. OECD Stat. Available at: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=TABLE5 (accessed 07.07.2016).

12. Yun Sun. China’s Foreign Aid Reform and Implication for Africa. Available at: http://brookings.edu/blogs/Africa-in-focus/posts/2015/07/01 (accessed 07.07.2016).


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Fedorovsky A., Voda K. Development Assistance in Foreign Strategies of China, the Republic of Korea and Japan. World Eonomy and International Relations, 2016, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 82-91. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-12-82-91



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Dear authors! Please note that in the VAK List of peer-reviewed scientific journals, in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of candidate and doctor of sciences should be published for the “MEMO Journal” the following specialties are recorded:
economic sciences:
5.2.5. World Economy.
5.2.1. Economic Theory
5.2.3. Regional and Branch Economics
political sciences:
5.5.4. International Relations
5.5.1. History and Theory of Politics
5.5.2. Political Institutions, Processes, Technologies

 

Current Issue
2024, vol. 68, No. 4
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Financial Contagion Propagation in Europe under the Impact of Global Shocks
  • Regional Powers on the African Continent: Trends and Prospects
  • Investment Activity of the PRC in the Kyrgyz Republic
  • “Land Grabbing” Concept: Global and National Aspects
Submit an Article
INVITATION FOR PUBLICATION
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.