Poverty in Kazakhstan

DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2015-59-12-105-115

T. Aliev, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 11, Prechistenskaya Emb., Moscow, 119034, Russian Federation; The Russian Foreign Trade Academy, 4a, Pudovkin Str., Moscow, 119285, Russian Federation (Aliev@apec.ranepa.ru)

Abstract. To properly assess the extent of poverty in Kazakhstan it is important to understand the methodology of its definition and measurement. There are three basic concepts of measuring poverty. Absolute poverty is based on the establishment of a living wage or poverty line. The position of the World Bank is dominant in the world in the assessment of absolute poverty. The WB experts use multiple criteria income. An internationally accepted poverty line was established in 2005 at US$ 1.25 (PPP) per person per day. They also used less “hard” indicator of US$ 2 per day (in constant 2005 prices) which is the median poverty line for all developing countries. For the transitional economies WB applies poverty line based on the differential absolute poverty equal to US$ 4.3 (before 1999 – US$ 4), for developed economies – US$ 11. According to a relative concept, the category of poor includes individuals and households with income clearly insufficient to live on prevailing community standards of consumption. This approach is used primarily for the developed countries. For example, in the EU the relative poverty is defined at the level of 60% of the median per capita income. Subjective approach (developed by Leiden University, Netherlands) takes into account people’s own estimates of their welfare status. In terms of Kazakhstan, the author states that any one-dimensional approach will fail to estimate the real extent of poverty and deprivation of the population. International and national statistics fail to provide an accurate picture of the number of poor in the country and the dynamics of poverty. According to national and WB statistics, in recent decades Kazakhstan showed substantial progress in reducing poverty. However, this was achieved largely due to maintaining rather low official levels of subsistence and cost of minimum food basket. Establishment of these indicators is mainly determined by political considerations, thus it lacks objectivity. For a country aiming to improve competitiveness of its economy and to achieve the level and quality of life comparable to developed countries the focus on a poverty criteria that is close to the standards of the poorest developing countries is not acceptable. Actually, the poverty situation in Kazakhstan continues to be a serious challenge. This is evidenced by the materials of international statistics based on criteria of poverty for countries in transition; by a quite high proportion of household spending on food and the relatively low (as compared to many Eastern European countries) national poverty line. It is concluded that a large-scale poverty still persists in Kazakhstan despite high rates of economic growth.

Keywords: absolute poverty, relative poverty, deprivation, international poverty line, cost of living, PPP, Kazakhstan

Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Aliev T. Poverty in Kazakhstan . World Eonomy and International Relations, 2015, vol. 59, No 12, pp. 105-115. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2015-59-12-105-115

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment






Current Issue
2023, vol. 67, No. 2
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  • Critical Materials’ Supply Chains and US National Security 
  • Civilizational Challenges to Russia’s Sustainable Development  
  • Latin America: in Search of Own Way 
  • On Certain Research Approaches to the World Information and Communication Order 
Submit an Article
The Editorial Board invites authors to write analytical articles on the following topics:
  • changes in the processes of globalization in modern conditions
  • formation of the new world order
  • shifts in civilization at the stage of transition to a digital society

The editors are also interested in publishing synthesis articles / scientific reviews revealing the main trends in the development of certain regions of the world - Latin America, Africa, South Asia, etc.