The Role of National Parliaments in Governing the European Union

345
DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2015-1-52-62

M. Strezhneva, Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAN), 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation; Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO-University), Russian Foreign Ministry, 76, Vernadskogo Prosp., Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation (m.strezhneva@imemo.ru).

Acknowledgment. The article has been supported by a grant of the Russian Foundation for Humanities (RFH). Project № 14-07-00050.



Abstract

Institutional structures and decision-making processes, which have been established in the European Union, fall beyond the scope of national rules for the functioning of parliamentary government. National parliaments of the EU member states have not succeeded in acquiring solid positions in the multilevel constellation within the Union. Yet nowadays they are assigned an important mission in their efforts to overcome, alongside the European Parliament (EP), the growing democratic deficit at both the European and national levels. The article is meant to assess the potential of national parliaments in capitalizing on the Lisbon Treaty provisions and on new forms of their engagement with supranational institutions (the European Council, the European Commission and the EP in particular), aimed at enhancing their legitimizing influence. General paradigm for the analysis is determined by the multilevel governance concept (MLG). It allows for a picture of European decision-making, which is shared by actors placed at different levels of the governance structure. National parliaments are supposed to be provided with multiple access points to the political process in the European Union as well. But the MLG vision doesn't contradict the fact that the key role within the EU belongs to those who occupy the highest executive power positions at the national level. Three directions for the national parliaments to intensify their involvement are put into spotlight: parliamentary control over national executives; control of compliance with the subsidiarity principle in European legislative proposals and supranational decisions; political dialogue with the European Commission and interparliamentary cooperation. The analysis proves that conditions are ripe for more active stance of national parliaments in the EU affairs. The “system of early warning” of the subsidiarity principle violations, provided for in the Lisbon Treaty, seems most promising. But national parliaments themselves will still have to demonstrate more persistence when using new instruments.


Keywords

European Union, multilevel governance, democratic deficit, national parliaments, parliamentary democracy, Lisbon Treaty, subsidiarity principle


Registered in System SCIENCE INDEX

For citation:
Strezhneva M. The Role of National Parliaments in Governing the European Union. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 2015, No 1, pp. 52-62. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2015-1-52-62



Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







Indexed

 

 

 

 

Current Issue
2022, vol. 66, No. 6
Topical Themes of the Issue:
  •  China on the Eve of the 20th CPC Congress 
  •  2020 Elections: “Stress Test” for American Federalism 
  •  The Chancellor O. Scholz’s Policy in the Context of Global Transformation 
  •  The EU China Policy in the Making: The Role of Central and Eastern Europe 
  •  Pan-European Political Space: From Idea to Reality
View This Issue (2022, vol. 66, No. 6)
Submit an Article
NEW SECTION

In response to the challenges of our time the Editorial board continues to open new thematic rubrics:

“World Energy Sector after Pandemic”. We plan to publish articles presenting in-depth analysis of influence of Pandemic on the global energy sector and forecasts of further developments in its various branches.