Arbatov Alexey
The Ukrainian crisis and strategic stability
Publication Type:


ISSN 1026-9487

DOI 10.17976/jpps/2022.04.03

The dramatic events in Ukraine, which unfolded from the end of February 2022, marked the end of an historical period of more than half a century. Relations between the USSR/Russia and the West have come full circle and returned to the Cold War, once again bringing the powers closer to the fateful line almost crossed in the days of the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962. First of all, presently the reasons for contemplating the use of Russian nuclear forces might allegedly include not only an attack on Russia and its allies using nuclear or conventional weapons, but also NATO’s direct involvement in local military operations on the territory of Ukraine, the provision of assistance to it with arms supplies, economic sanctions and even aggressive statements against Russia. In the West, this topic is widely discussed, including at the governmental level, despite Moscow’s official statements that it does not have any nuclear plans. Secondly, the impact of the Ukrainian tragedy on strategic stability is that it directly affected the negotiations between Russia and the United States on strategic weapons, which were once again “frozen” after a successful debut in July 2021 in Geneva. Third, the current conflict has had a detrimental effect on the overall climate of political relations between states in Europe and beyond, which has always been an important foundation for arms control negotiations. If the worst-case scenario is avoided, then sooner or later the Ukrainian problem will be resolved peacefully, no matter how difficult and distant such an outcome may seem now. After that, or even in the process of moving towards peace, it is possible to resume the dialogue between Russia and the United States on arms control. This has been the case in the past, starting with the easing of tensions after the Cuban Missile Crisis and the signing of the 1963 Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. After that, while resolving periodic crises, the responsible powers concluded dozens of treaties on nuclear weapons and other lethal means, which made it possible by the end of the 1980’s to end the Cold War, curtail the arms race and rid the world of the specter of a nuclear Armageddon for the ensuing thirty years.


Keywords: Russia | the USA | Ukraine | special military operation | strategic stability | arms control |

Russian Science Citation Index



OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC

Stefanovich Dmitry, Yermakov Alexander
Стратегическая авиация сквозь эпохи: задачи, опасности и решения // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21, № 6. С. 129-145. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-6-129-145.

Oznobishchev S., Klimov Vasily
Пора заканчивать игру в бирюльки. Контроль над вооружениями и большая политика // Россия в глобальной политике. 2024. № 4 (128). С. 88-97. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2024-22-4-88-97.

Bogdanov Konstantin
Фактор ПРО в Европе: противоречия и кризис режимов контроля над вооружениями [Текст] / К. В. Богданов // Европейская безопасность: события, оценки, прогнозы. – 2018. – № 50 (66). – С. 5-8.

Romashkina Natalia
Стратегическая нестабильность: новая миссия России в многополярном мире // Стратегическая стабильность. 2024. № 4 (109). С. 42-46.

Savel'ev Alexander , Alexandria O.
Единство средств и расхождение целей // Россия в глобальной политике. 2022. Т. 20, № 2. С. 166-182. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2022-20-2-166-182.

Savel'ev Alexander
Ядерное сдерживание, стратегическая стабильность, противоракетная оборона. Даёт ли ядерный арсенал подлинную безопасность государствам // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21, № 5. С. 20-34. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-5-20-34.

Bubnova Natalia
The Status of Strategic Offensive Arms Limitations: Bridging the Present and Future. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 123–149 (in Russian).

Bogdanov Konstantin
Сдерживание в эпоху малых форм // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21, № 3. С. 42-52. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-3-42-52.

Mizin Victor
Prospects of Russian-American Dialogue on Strategic Stability and New START

Oznobishchev S., Klimov Vasily
Contemporary Europe in the Crosshairs of Washington and Brussels Policies

Oznobishchev S., Klimov Vasily
NATO defense planning under new military and political conditions

Arbatov Alexey
Глобальная стабильность в ядерном мире // Вестник Российской академии наук. 2021. Т. 91, № 6. С. 560-570. DOI 10.31857/S0869587321050030.

Россия: контроль над вооружениями и международная безопасность (на англ. языке). Отв. ред. В.Г. Барановский, А.Н. Калядин. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 2001, 41 п.л.

Savel'ev Alexander
Уместно ли на троих? // Россия в глобальной политике. 2020. № 4. С. 202-215.

Mizin Victor
Будущее контроля над вооружениями: исходные коды к обновленной концепции // Журнал политических исследований : сетевое издание. 2025. Т. 9, № 4. C. 160-179. DOI 10.12737/2587-6295-2025-9-4-160-179. URL: http://naukaru.ru/ru/nauka/article/112040/view. Дата публикации: 26.12.2025.

Savel'ev Alexander , Veselov V., Utkina K.
Многосторонний контроль над вооружениями: уроки истории ХХ в. // Преподавание истории и обществознания в школе. 2025. № 7. С. 3-14. DOI 10.47639/2074-4935_2025_7_3.

Ежегодник СИПРИ 1999 «Вооружения, разоружение и международная безопасность» со Специальным приложением ИМЭМО РАН: пер. с англ. М.: Наука, 2000, 62,5 п.л.

Russia: arms control, disarmament and international security / IMEMO supplement to the Russian edition of the SIPRI Yearbook 2012. Edited by A. Kaliadine, A. Arbatov. Moscow: IMEMO RAN, 2013, 200 p.
Related publications


Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







First news
Institute News
13/03/2026

The research report "Changing Britain" has been published. It examines current economic and political trends in the United Kingdom and the country's role in the world economy and international relations. It presents an analysis of key trends, expert assessments, and forecasts on several main topics: the state and problems of the British economy; current party-political dynamics and public opinion; UK relations with the US and the EU.

more...

12/03/2026

The next issue of the MEMO Journal (No. 3, 2026) is published. The central place in it is occupied by articles on economic issues devoted to the analysis of foreign experience in responding to the challenges of the technological revolution; the development of a payment infrastructure for cross-border settlements; direct investment research under conditions of sanctions; Russia's resource policy in the face of D. Trump's tariff wars.

more...

Recently Published