Arbatov Alexey
The Ukrainian crisis and strategic stability
Publication Type:

ISSN 1026-9487

DOI 10.17976/jpps/2022.04.03

The dramatic events in Ukraine, which unfolded from the end of February 2022, marked the end of an historical period of more than half a century. Relations between the USSR/Russia and the West have come full circle and returned to the Cold War, once again bringing the powers closer to the fateful line almost crossed in the days of the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962. First of all, presently the reasons for contemplating the use of Russian nuclear forces might allegedly include not only an attack on Russia and its allies using nuclear or conventional weapons, but also NATO’s direct involvement in local military operations on the territory of Ukraine, the provision of assistance to it with arms supplies, economic sanctions and even aggressive statements against Russia. In the West, this topic is widely discussed, including at the governmental level, despite Moscow’s official statements that it does not have any nuclear plans. Secondly, the impact of the Ukrainian tragedy on strategic stability is that it directly affected the negotiations between Russia and the United States on strategic weapons, which were once again “frozen” after a successful debut in July 2021 in Geneva. Third, the current conflict has had a detrimental effect on the overall climate of political relations between states in Europe and beyond, which has always been an important foundation for arms control negotiations. If the worst-case scenario is avoided, then sooner or later the Ukrainian problem will be resolved peacefully, no matter how difficult and distant such an outcome may seem now. After that, or even in the process of moving towards peace, it is possible to resume the dialogue between Russia and the United States on arms control. This has been the case in the past, starting with the easing of tensions after the Cuban Missile Crisis and the signing of the 1963 Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. After that, while resolving periodic crises, the responsible powers concluded dozens of treaties on nuclear weapons and other lethal means, which made it possible by the end of the 1980’s to end the Cold War, curtail the arms race and rid the world of the specter of a nuclear Armageddon for the ensuing thirty years.

Keywords: Russia | the USA | Ukraine | special military operation | strategic stability | arms control |

Russian Science Citation Index


Stefanovich Dmitry, Yermakov Alexander
Стратегическая авиация сквозь эпохи: задачи, опасности и решения // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21, № 6. С. 129-145. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-6-129-145.

Bogdanov Konstantin
Фактор ПРО в Европе: противоречия и кризис режимов контроля над вооружениями [Текст] / К. В. Богданов // Европейская безопасность: события, оценки, прогнозы. – 2018. – № 50 (66). – С. 5-8.

Savel'ev Alexander , Alexandria O.
Единство средств и расхождение целей // Россия в глобальной политике. 2022. Т. 20, № 2. С. 166-182. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2022-20-2-166-182.

Savel'ev Alexander
Ядерное сдерживание, стратегическая стабильность, противоракетная оборона. Даёт ли ядерный арсенал подлинную безопасность государствам // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21, № 5. С. 20-34. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-5-20-34.

Bogdanov Konstantin
Сдерживание в эпоху малых форм // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21, № 3. С. 42-52. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-3-42-52.

Arbatov Alexey
Глобальная стабильность в ядерном мире // Вестник Российской академии наук. 2021. Т. 91, № 6. С. 560-570. DOI 10.31857/S0869587321050030.

Россия: контроль над вооружениями и международная безопасность (на англ. языке). Отв. ред. В.Г. Барановский, А.Н. Калядин. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 2001, 41 п.л.

Savel'ev Alexander
Уместно ли на троих? // Россия в глобальной политике. 2020. № 4. С. 202-215.

Ежегодник СИПРИ 1999 «Вооружения, разоружение и международная безопасность» со Специальным приложением ИМЭМО РАН: пер. с англ. М.: Наука, 2000, 62,5 п.л.

Russia: arms control, disarmament and international security / IMEMO supplement to the Russian edition of the SIPRI Yearbook 2012. Edited by A. Kaliadine, A. Arbatov. Moscow: IMEMO RAN, 2013, 200 p.

Bogdanov Konstantin
Контроль гибридной эпохи // Россия в глобальной политике. 2021. Т. 19, № 5 (111). С. 122-136. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2021-19-5-122-136.

Stefanovich Dmitry
Strategic stability at 30+ years: stasis, evolution, or degradation? Journal of International Analytics. 2021;12(3):123-138.

Voitolovsky Feodor
Deep changes in external environment affecting Russia’s national security

Stepanova Ekaterina
Политика России по Сирии на этапе военного вмешательства [Текст] / Е. Степанова // ПОНАРС Евразия. Аналитические записки. – 2016. – № 421. – С. 1 – 9.

Bogdanov Konstantin
Strategic stability: Dynamics and factors of transformation. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 7–47. DOI: 10.48015/2076-7404-2022-14-4-7-47. (In Russ.)

Yevtodyeva Marianna
Мировой рынок вооружений: традиционные тренды или новые реалии? // Новый оборонный заказ. 2023. № 4(81). С. 10-19.
Related publications

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

First news
Institute News

On June 19, 2024 at 12:00 in the Academician Inozemtsev conference hall (3rd floor) a meeting of the Scientific and Theoretical Seminar of the Center for Asia Pacific Studies was held.



On June 18, 2024 at 16:00 TASS held a Press Conference dedicated to the announcement of the Anniversary 10th international Scientific and Expert Forum "Primakov Readings" on the theme "Russia in the Global Context".


Recently Published