USA - China: the anatomy of the trade conflict
ISSN 0869-1908
DOI 10.31857/S086919080005960-3
In 2017-2018, the United States initiated a trade conflict with China. By its scope, this conflict is an unprecedented event in the history of international trade, at least since the inception of the WTO. Quite logically the world media designated the conflict a «trade war», giving rise to numerous publications related to the US-China relations and their impact on the world economy and politics. The additional edge to these publications was caused by the incomplete clarity of Donald Trump administration's goals in the conflict with China, as well as the inconsistency of the individual steps taken by Washington. The main areas of concern for the United States were serious problems in ensuring the intellectual property rights in China, including trade secrets; large-scale use of industrial policies conducive to stateowned enterprises and «national champions», including a «security and control» policy for the information and communications sector; export restrictions, subsidies, unique national standards and investment restrictions; worryingly agrarian policies that block US market access; and, finally, the lack of transparency in the actions of China. The policy of Beijing looked more predictable, although it also proved to be quite uncertain. Beijing's response to the protectionism of the American administration caused mass approval of the Chinese population, as well as the reaction of the business class of Chinese society, which appeared to be quite unambiguous. The trade conflict reflects the deep-seated contradictions between the both parties, concerning China's leadership in the global economy and politics, and the growth of its influence in the most diverse regions. A new bipolarity in international relations is emerging; the perception of China's rise as a threat to American interests reflects the recognition of this country as a serious rival. The attempts to slow down the rise of the PRC, including its field of advanced technologies, look like a quite conservative and shortsighted policy. The following review examines the chronology of the conflict, its possible causes and consequences, the positions of the parties, as well as its impact on the two countries' trade in 2018. The problems are viewed with consideration of the both countries' role in global economy and technological competition.
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Rogozhin Alexander
Американо-китайский торговый конфликт и страны Юго-Восточной Азии [Текст] / А. А. Рогожин // Юго-Восточная Азия: актуальные проблемы развития. – 2019. – Т. 1. – № 1 (42). – С. 32-37.
Ivanov Stanislav
Сирийский конфликт и роль внешних сил в нем [Текст] / С.М. Иванов // Зарубежное военное обозрение. – 2016. – № 11. – С. 11 – 16.
Rogozhin Alexander
Уникальный справочник по Вьетнаму. Рец. на кн.: Вьетнам - торговый и инвестиционный партнёр: Справочник. М.: ИКСА РАН. 2022. 389 с // Вьетнамские исследования. 2022. Т. 6, № 4. С. 83-85. DOI 10.54631/VS.2022.64-117630.
Barinov Igor
Ethnopolitical conflict in the Former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia and EU enlargement in the Balkans
Malyshev Dmitry
Приднестровский конфликт и вопросы урегулирования // Международная жизнь. 2020. № 9. С. 58-71.
Rastol'tsev Sergey, Romashkina Natalia
Unresolved conflicts on the Post-soviet space in Europe and the role of Russia in the settlement (transnistrian and nagorno-karabakh conflicts cases)
Subbotin Mikhail
Трансграничный прецедент [Текст] / М. А. Субботин // Нефтегазовая вертикаль. – 2018. – № 18. – С. 32-37.
Frolov Alexander
Йемен: маргинальная война? [Текст] / А.В. Фролов // Обозреватель-Observer. – 2017. – № 12. – С. 31-43.
Stepanova Ekaterina
Асимметричный конфликт как нематематическая категория / Е.А. Степанова // Индекс безопасности. – 2011. – № 2. – С. 167–172.
Ivanov Stanislav
Сирийский конфликт – эпицентр нестабильности в регионе [Текст] / С.М. Иванов // Обозреватель-Observer. – 2019. – № 5 (352). – С. 21-30.
Trenin Dmitry
Стратегическое сдерживание: новые контуры // Россия в глобальной политике. 2024. Т. 22, № 4. С. 74–86. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2024-22-4-74-86.
Kosolapov Nikolay
US-Russian Military Confrontation: Likely, Rather Than Not
Volkov Aleksei
Economic relations of Russia with Finland at the present stage
Kholodkovskii Kirill
Двойственность российской идентичности / К.Г. Холодковский // Полития. Журнал политической философии и социологии политики. – 2011. – № 1. – С. 85–97.
Ivanov Stanislav
Вмешательство иностранных государств в сирийский конфликт [Текст] / С.М. Иванов // Зарубежное военное обозрение. – 2018. – № 7 (856). – С. 17-23
Gronsky Alexander
Украинский фактор в молдо-приднестровских отношениях // Аналитический бюллетень ИСПИРР. 2020. № 1-2 (3-4). С. 22-30.
Baranovsky Vladimir , Kuvaldin V.
Глобальный конфликт: атрибут меняющегося миропорядка или устаревший инструмент его трансформации? // Полис. Политические исследования. 2023. № 6. С. 8-20. DOI 10.17976/jpps/2023.06.02.
Frolov Alexander
Вашингтон – Тегеран: конфликт или компромисс? [Текст] / А. В. Фролов // Обозреватель-Observer. – 2018. – № 8. – С. 51-61.
Smirnov Alexey
Европейский правый центризм перед вызовом украинского конфликта: по ту сторону страха // Власть. 2023. Т. 31, № 5. С. 221-231. DOI 10.31171/vlast.v31i5.9821.
Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Принципы самоорганизации полицентрического миропорядка / К.С. Гаджиев // Власть. – 2012. – № 6. – С. 162–166.
Related publications
No comments