Zvyagelskaya Irina
Soviet Researchers on the Middle East: Ahead of Their Time
Publication Type:

ISSN 2071-8160

DOI 10.24833/2071-8160-2019-4-67-24-37

In the mid-1950s-1960s the Soviet Orientalists were facing serious challenges. The collapse of the colonial system, the growth of national liberation movements, the entry of new forces that did not fit into the rigid framework of the Communist ideas about the revolutionary process, demanded realistic explanations of what was happening. The article attempts to consider some breakthrough ideas and assessments of historical events in the Middle East put forward by the Soviet experts. The review is primarily based on the publications of Soviet specialists published in the 1970’s. Among those who studied the new trends and tried to explain their further development were Soviet Arabists. At that time their circle was small. Among those who were engaged in political problems of the Arab world, one can name I.P. Belyaev, E.M. Primakov, G.I. Mirsky, A.M. Vasilyev. They had different backgrounds, but all had managed to form in their studies a fairly complete picture of political trends and state-building in the Arab world. Despite the domination of the official dogmas the leading Soviet researchers were able to present a realistic picture of the region, although their «untimely meditations» were presented in a form acceptable to the Communist ideology.The primitive division of society into the bourgeoisie, the proletariat, peasantry and landlords and the hopes for eventual development of communist parties worldwide both did not reflect the realities in the Third World countries and did not leave room for the Soviet Union there. Due to ideological reasons the USSR could not support nationalist movements abroad. Nevertheless, the Soviet leadership passed the first test for the ability to reassess their ideological stereotypes in the early 1950s, when the leaders of the Egyptian revolution turned to the USSR for military assistance. In order to justify the pragmatic choice in favor of supporting the new Arab nationalist leaders, the Soviet scholars developed the concept of three consecutive and co-dependent revolutionary flows: first, the national liberation movement overthrowing the colonial system; second, the world labor movement overthrowing the capitalist system politically; and, third, the world communist movement overthrowing the capitalist system in economic terms.It was also important for the Soviet leaders to explain the orientation of the young decolonized nationalist regimes towards the USSR, without using the argument of just political expediency. Such an explanation was the theory of the non-capitalist path of development or socialist orientation. It posed that capitalism cannot solve any of the problems of developing countries. Their interest in rapid overcoming of backwardness and maintaining national sovereignty cannot be combined with the choice of a capitalist development model. The theory of socialist orientation was based on original ideas of Marxism founders and further developed by Lenin who insisted that economically underdeveloped countries can with the help of the proletariat from advanced countries go directly to socialism bypassing capitalism.The reality of revolutions without the proletariat and the desire to take advantage of the anti-colonial struggle to establish full-scale presence of the USSR in the Middle Eats made the Soviet leadership more tolerant of scientists' attempts to realistically analyze regional trends and developments.For instance, in the Soviet era, politicians were tempted to explain all conflicts in the regions of the Third world, and particularly in the Middle East exclusively by the workings of imperialism. However, Soviet scholars, E.M. Primakov among them, warned in their studies of the dangers of such simplified estimates. Still relevant today also is G. Mirsky’s explanation of the major role the army plays in the politics of the Middle East. He argued that in the traditional societies of the region the army was the only modern, nationwide institution.The works of the Soviet scholars can help better understand contemporary trends. Their studies of driving forces of the revolutions in the Arab world, of the nationalistic regimes, of regional conflicts have not lost their relevance today. They warn the modern generation of researchers against simplistic conclusions, a temptation of politicized assessments and of ignoring the complexity of regional issues.

Russian Science Citation Index


Frolov Alexander
Ближний Восток: традиции и трансформации [Текст] / А.В. Фролов, Р. Мустафин // Международная жизнь. – 2014. – № 8. – С. 45 – 62.

Ivanov Stanislav
Where does the middle East “Arab spring”? / Ivanov S.M.

Frolov Alexander
Арабские ставки Пекина // Обозреватель-Observer. 2023. № 2. С. 25-35. DOI 10.48137/2074-2975_2023_2_25.

Zvyagelskaya Irina, Bogacheva Anastasia, Davydov Alexey, Ibragimov Ibragim, Lazovskii Stanislav, Samarskaia Liudmila, Svistunova Irina, Surkov Nikolay, Tyukaeva Tatiana
Российская политика на Ближнем Востоке: перспективы и вызовы // Свободная мысль. 2021. № 6 (1690). С. 71-85. DOI 10.24412/0869-4435-2021-61690-71-86.

Badaeva Anna
The Far Right in Sweden: from Neo-nazism to Centrism

Ivanov Stanislav
Rise of the Kurdistan Factor in Regional Geopolitics [Text] / S. Ivanov // World Eсonomy and International Relations. — 2015. — No 10. — P. 84-93

Ivanov Stanislav
The Middle East and the Modern World Order

, Ivanov Stanislav
Курдский национализм: история и современность. М.: ЛЕНАНД, 2015, 352 с.

Ivanov Stanislav
The Kurdish problem as a legacy of the Versailles system of world order

Malysheva Dina
The Middle East between turbulence and development

Ivanov Stanislav
Conflicts within the Muslim world as a threat to stability and security in the Middle East // Revue Défense Nationale 17 mars. 2021. URL: https://www.defnat.com/e-RDN/vue-tribune.php?ctribune=1358 (дата обращения: 19.03.2021).

Kondrat’ev Vladimir
Resource Nationalism

Kalinina Natalia
The Middle East: Hello to Russian Arms!

Bogacheva Anastasia, Davydov Alexey, Ibragimov Ibragim, Zvyagelskaya Irina, Kobrinskaya Irina, Samarskaia Liudmila, Svistunova Irina, Surkov Nikolay
Ближний Восток в тисках кризиса. Поиски выхода // Свободная мысль. 2020. № 5 (1683). С. 123-136. DOI 10.24411/0869-4435-2020-00010.

Frolov Alexander
О ближневосточных войнах // Международная жизнь. 2023. № 2. С. 84-93.

Surkov Nikolay
Тренды Ближнего Востока и Центральной Азии [Текст] = Contemporary trends in the Middle East and Central Asia / Н. Ю. Сурков // Вестник МГИМО - Университета. – 2018. – № 6(63). – С. 325-333. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2018-6-63-325-333. – Рец. на кн.: Звягельская И.Д. Ближний Восток и Центральная Азия: Глобальные тренды в региональном исполнении. – М.: Аспект Пресс, 2018. – 224 с.

Ivanov Stanislav
Осторожно! Ближний Восток // Новый оборонный заказ. Стратегии. 2024. № 3 (84). С.31-39.

Ivanov Stanislav
Joe Biden's visit to the Middle East: losses and gains

Ivanov Stanislav
Тенденции развития военной промышленности ряда ближневосточных стран [Текст] / С.М. Иванов // Зарубежное военное обозрение. – 2019. – № 6 (867). – С. 30-34

Avatkov Vladimir, Sbitneva A.
Political course of modern Turke. The main features of domestic and foreign policy of 2019
Related publications

Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment

First news
Institute News

A meeting of the Academic council of IMEMO was hold at the Academician N.N. Inozemtsev conference hall.



The next issue of the MEMO Journal (No. 7 for 2024) opens with the topical rubric "Security Problems in the Modern World", which features articles by A. Arbatov "The Bearing Structure of Global Security" and A. Krivopalov "The Southern Flank of U.S. Deployment in Eastern Europe".


Recently Published