Goffe Nina, Monusova Galina
Well-being: reality and its perception
Publication Type:
Rubric:


ISSN 2619-0567

This paper studies well-being in developed countries, based on both objective and subjective estimates. We look at how approaches to evaluating well-being have changed over time. Using the data from empirical cross-country research, we analyze discrepancies between subjective perception of and objective statistical data on well-being. Based on surveys conducted by the international market research organisation Ipsos MORI, the European Social Survey (ESS), the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), etc., as well as on academic literature, our research shows the extent of how distorted individual perception of reality is, which is a novel approach to studying social well-being. Our analysis shows that individuals see various aspects of well-being differently from how those aspects are presented in objective statistics. They generally place too much emphasis on the negative aspects of their daily lives, as well as on various threats and risks, regardless of what country they live in. At the same time, they underestimate the positive aspects. The paper discusses why these discrepancies arise and what consequences they might have for society. To a large extent, this trend is related to limited individual awareness, distorted facts presented by the media, and other sources which manipulate public opinion, playing on real and imaginary issues and fears. In addition, errors in perception of well-being are largely linked to the quality of the institutional environment, equal opportunities, views on justice, etc. We have found out that highlighting negative aspects and underestimating positive ones affect life satisfaction, influence preferences, and shape reactions, as well as social, economic and political behavior. Given that individual behavior is driven by subjective views of reality, the errors in perception might lead to decline not only in individual well-being, but also in the well-being of society at large.



Russian Science Citation Index



OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC

Goffe Nina, Monusova Galina
Perception of social reality and subjective well-being in developed countries. – Moscow, IMEMO, 2020. – 166 p.

Monusova Galina
Type of Employment Contract and Subjective well-being

Kirichenko Irina
Амбициозные и бессмысленные /И.В. Кириченко = Анастасия Матвеева // Эксперт. 2014. – № 3 (882). – С. 66 – 71

Goffe Nina
Субъективное благополучие в пространственном измерении // Общественные науки и современность. 2023. № 6. С. 75-86. DOI 10.31857/S0869049923060060.

Shultseva Vera
Digital imperative: what fuel starts your economy?

Tsapenko Irina
Социальные эффекты иммиграции [Текст] / И.П. Цапенко // Вестник Российской академии наук. – 2015. – Т. 85. – № 10. – С. 906 – 915.

Mirkin Yakov
Economic and statistical analysis of the financial depth of the economy

Shlikhter Alexey
Вопросы измерения качества жизни в США и концепция устойчивого развития [Текст] / А. А. Шлихтер // Общество и экономика. – 2018. – № 7. – С. 99-112. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760000177-3.

Semenenko Irina, Khaynatskaya Tatiana
Дискурсы о благополучии в реальности «неустойчивого развития»: между прошлым и будущим // Общественные науки и современность. 2022. № 5. С. 76-99. DOI 10.31857/S0869049922050045.

Khorolskaya Maria
Problems of treatment and perception of history of GDR in united Germany

Monusova Galina
Приверженность организации в межстрановой перспективе [Текст] / Г.А. Монусова // Российский журнал менеджмента. – 2015. – Т. 13. – №  4. – С. 29 – 50.

Monusova Galina, Gimpelson V.
Воспроиятие неравенства и социальная мобильность. /Г.А. Монусова, В.Е. Гимпельсон // Экономический журнал Высшей школы экономики. – 2014. – Т. 18. – № 2. – С. 1 – 33

Tsapenko Irina
Объективные и воспринимаемые последствия иммиграции [Текст] / И.П. Цапенко // Демоскоп Weekly. – 2016. – № 675-676. – С. 1 – 28.

Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Об идеологизации внешнеполитической стратегии США // Международная жизнь. 2021. № 7. С. 42-53.

Monusova Galina
Отношения к мигрантам: мнения и сомнения россиян // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2021. № 6. С. 436-458. DOI 10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2139.

Kirichenko Irina, Vorobyeva D.
Финляндия: инструменты инновационной политики в условиях кризиса [Текст] / И.В. Кириченко, Д.А. Воробьева // МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие). – 2017. – Т. 8. – № 4(32). – С. 544-553.

Kapelyushnikov Rostislav
Job Turnover: What the Russian Statistics Tells Us

Monusova Galina
Redistributive Preferences and Indicators of Social Mobility

Bogacheva Olga
Формулирование базовых элементов государственных программ: основные требования и типичные ошибки [Текст] /О.В. Богачева, О.К. Ястребова // Бюджет. – 2014. – № 1. – С. 2 – 6.
Related publications


Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







First news
Institute News
17/07/2024

A meeting of the Academic council of IMEMO was hold at the Academician N.N. Inozemtsev conference hall.

more...

10/07/2024

The next issue of the MEMO Journal (No. 7 for 2024) opens with the topical rubric "Security Problems in the Modern World", which features articles by A. Arbatov "The Bearing Structure of Global Security" and A. Krivopalov "The Southern Flank of U.S. Deployment in Eastern Europe".

more...

Recently Published