Labetskaya Ekaterina
Russia-EU: “Soft-Power Risks” in the Eurasian-Arctic Context. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, no 9, vol. 62, pp. 112-120
ISSN 0131-2227
DOI 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-112-120
Russia-EU: “Soft-Power Risks” in the Eurasian-Arctic Context. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2018, no 9, vol. 62, pp. 112-120
Publication Type:
ISSN 0131-2227
DOI 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-112-120
Russia–EU relations are regarded within a framework of the ongoing author’s “Trans-Arctic study”, which allows to consider new formats of global interaction in the Arctic macro-region, often referred to as conflict-free. Behind the “conflict-free Arctic”, the hybrid policy of “Smart & Intelligent Power” hides, which is fraught with the erosion of identity in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation (AZ RF). Soft-power risks, which are brought to the AZ RF due to transformation of the Russia–EU interaction paradigm, are its part. The modernized “Northern Sea Route” and huge natural resources of the AZ RF are a colossal “capital” of Russia, which cause envy and generate the wish of foes to exercise economic, political, cultural and information control over this “capital”. The multiplier of these challenges is the growth of global significance of the “Eurasian-Arctic field” in the Trans-Arctic, where the “soft-, smart-, intelligent-, sharp-power” has become a popular instrument of foreign policy. An analysis of the EU’s ambitious integrated Arctic strategy and its model of interactions in the region suggests that in the near future, the European Union’s presence in the Trans-Arctic will remain limited. And “soft-power risks” generated here by the EU will be “broadcast” to Russia through the actors of the Trans-Artic multi-level management system, who are closely affiliated with Brussels. For a safe Russia–EU interaction in the “Eurasian-Arctic Field” of the Trans-Arctic or in the AZ RF it is necessary to elaborate a new model, which would take into account the risk of “soft-power and sharp-power” intervention – the one that will not allow to awaken the dormant conflict-generating force of the Trans-Arctic.
Keywords: Eurasia | the EU | Russia | Trans-Arctic | security | geopolitics | space | securitization | power |
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Labetskaya Ekaterina
Арктический вектор евразийского партнерства // Наш дом – Евразия. Доклады и материалы Международной конференции. М.: Международный институт Питирима Сорокина – Николая Кондратьева, 2018. – сс. 69-80.
Labetskaya Ekaterina
Prospects of Arctic Cooperation of the Member Countries of the Eurasian Economic Union: in the Context of the International Сomprehensive Safety and Security
Arbatov Alexey
Россия-США-Евросоюз: проблемы ПРО и РСМД / А.Г. Арбатов // Современная Европа. – 2008. – № 3. – С. 1–22.
Arbatov Alexey
Russia-USA-EU: problems of ABMD and MSRM.
Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Проект «Один пояс, один путь» в геополитическом измерении // Вопросы политологии. 2020. № 3. С. 702-714. DOI 10.35775/PSI.2020.55.3.001.
Malysheva Dina
Россия в Средиземноморье: геополитика и современные интересы [Текст] / Д.Б. Малышева // Международная жизнь. – 2015. – № 11. – С. 111 – 123.
Stepanova Ekaterina
Как и почему Россия и США могут сотрудничать в противодействии терроризму [Электронный ресурс] / Е. Степанова // ПОНАРС Евразия. Аналитические записки. – 2016. – № 450. – С. 1 – 9.
Pankov Evgeny
Securitization of International Threats in Speeches of Russian and German Foreign Ministers, 2021–2023: Quantitative Analysis. Society: Philosophy, History, Culture. (8), 139–146.
Rustamova Leili
The mechanism of "soft power" implementation and the limits of its use
Gadzhiev Kamaludin
О тотализации войны в гибридном измерении [Текст] / К. С. Гаджиев // Власть. – 2019. – № 3. – С. 9-19. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i3.6396.
Solovyev Eduard
The modern theory of geopolitics: between the neoclassical renaissance and radical revisionism / Solovyev E.G.
Smirnov Alexey
«Коронавирусная геополитика» стран вишеградского взаимодействия // Вопросы политологии. 2022. Т. 12, № 3 (79). С. 773-785. DOI 10.35775/PSI.2022.79.3.016.
Долматова С.А.
Устойчивое развитие в эпоху поликризиса и дезинтеграции: можно ли восстановить глобальное сотрудничество? // Вопросы политической экономии. 2023. № 1 (33). С. 158-172. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.7850947.
Transnational Political Space: New Realities of International Development. Ed. by M. Strezhneva. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2010
Labetskaya Ekaterina
Арктика: конец аллюзии, или Белое Безмолвие гибридной войны // Перспективы. Электронный журнал. 2022. № 3 (30). С. 43-52. DOI 10.32726/2411-3417-2022-3-43-52. URL: https://www.perspektivy.info/oykumena/amerika/arktika_konec_alluzii_ili_beloje_bezmolvije_gibridnoj_vojny_2022-07-16.htm. Дата публикации: 16.07.2022.
Gadzhiev Kamaludin
О грамшианских корнях идеи «мягкой силы» // Вопросы политологии. 2021. Т. 11, № 8 (72). С. 2214-2224. DOI 10.35775/PSI.2021.72.8.002.
Mikheev Vasily
Россия - Тихоокеанская держава? [Текст] / В.В. Михеев // Научные труды международного союза экономистов и вольного экономического общества России. – 2015. – Т. 40. – С. 159 – 173.
Pritchin Stanislav
Russian Policy towards Central Asia in the Late 20th and Early 21st Century // Электронный научно-образовательный журнал «История». 2021. Vol. 12, Issue 3 (101). DOI 10.18254/S207987840010196-4. URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840010196-4-1/. Дата публикации: 15.04.2021.
Related publications
No comments