Роль ОДКБ в обеспечении коллективной безопасности // Федерализм. 2022. Т. 27, № 3 (107). С. 77-88. DOI 10.21686/2073-1051-2022-3-77-88.
ISSN 2073-1051
DOI 10.21686/2073-1051-2022-3-77-88
This article presented to the attention of readers is dedicated to the analysis of history, present condition and development prospects of inter-state relations on national and regional security between former Soviet republics, now new sovereign Eurasian states, as well as to the examination of organization forms of such relations. Having formulated basic principles of cooperation on these issues and underlying the need of collective and coordinated activities against threats to their security and stability in new geopolitical realities stipulated by the collapse of the USSR nine post-Soviet states concluded the Collective Security Treaty which came into force in 1994. Five years later, in April 1999, presidents of six these countries, namely Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia and Tajikistan, signed the protocol on prolongation of the Collective Security Treaty for the next five years while Azerbaijan, Georgia and Uzbekistan refused to extend their membership in the Treaty and left it. It happened since due to a number of various domestic and external reasons the formation of national statehood of new sovereign states began to differ substantially from each other as to their strategic goals, aspirations and orientations which subsequently caused serious changes in their approaches to building relations with their foreign partners in bilateral and multilateral forms. In this connection in May 2002 those countries that retained their membership in the Collective Security Treaty decided to reorganize it into a new alliance with a higher degree of integration of its members in order to increase its role in promoting national and regional security - the Collective Security Treaty Organization. The present article examines basic events connected with the Collective Security Treaty Organization formation over the next 20 years, evolution of its goals and tasks, as well as requirements of making concrete directions of its activities more precise because of fundamental changes in the international environment. In the course of the undertaken analysis most important achievements of the Collective Security Treaty Organization during these years were singled out as well as concrete shortcomings in its activities were noted. Also, alternative variants of further development of this international security organization including those that may exceed the post-Soviet space were mentioned.
Keywords: Collective Security Treaty, Collective Security Treaty Organization, security threats and challenges, military-technical cooperation, peace-keeping activities, foreign military presence |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Malyshev Dmitry
Миротворчество в СНГ и мировой опыт // Свободная мысль. 2021. № 5 (1689). С. 105-118.
Russia: arms control, disarmament and international security / IMEMO supplement to the Russian edition of the SIPRI Yearbook 2016. Edited by A. Arbatov, S. Oznobishchev. Moscow: IMEMO, 2017, 205 p.
Romashkina Natalia
ИКТ-угрозы в военно-политической сфере: сотрудничество или конфронтация мировых держав? [Текст] / Н. П. Ромашкина // Международная жизнь. – 2018. – Спец.выпуск "Россия и глобальные вызовы в области информационной безопасности". – С. 97-102.
Andreeva Tatiyana
Военно-техническое сотрудничество Великобритания–ЕС [Текст] / Т.Н. Андреева // Свободная мысль. – 2018. – № 5. – С. 87-100
Andreeva Tatiyana
During Brexit talks. The UK-EU defence industrial cooperation
Malysheva Dina
Постсоветская Центральная Азия и Афганистан как сфера пересечения интересов крупных азиатских государств [Текст] / Д. Б. Малышева // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения. – 2018. – Т. 18. – № 2. – С. 259-272. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2018-18-2-259-272.
Zagorskii Andrei
Zagorskii A. Conventional security and cooperation in the Arctic. – Moscow, IMEMO, 2016. – 104 p.
Военно-техническое сотрудничество России с иностранными государствами: основы, проблемы и перспективы. Под ред. Н.И. Калининой. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 2010, 283 с.
Savel'ev Alexander
Политические и военно-стратегические аспекты Договоров СНВ-1 и СНВ-2. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 2000, 155 c.
Kalinina Natalia, Kozyulin V.B.
Russia Defense Industry: Feet of Clay
Kanaev Evgeny
Японо-американский альянс и проблема Южно-Китайского моря: последствия для азиатско-тихоокеанской безопасности [Текст] / Е.А. Канаев, А.Н. Сигутина // Юго-Восточная Азия: актуальные проблемы развития. – 2017. – № 34. – С. 61-74.
Frolov Alexander
Администрация Байдена и ближневосточное наследие США // Обозреватель-Observer. 2021. № 5 (376). С. 29-46. DOI 10.48137/2074-2975_2021_5_29.
Kalinina Natalia, Kozyulin V.B.
Договор о торговле оружием: заставить пушки замолчать / Н.И. Калинина, В.Б. Козюлин // Индекс безопасности. – 2010. – Т. 16. – № 3. – С. 81-98.
Военно-экономическое обеспечение национальной безопасности России в многополярном мире. Рук. проекта – Р.А. Фарамазян. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 2009, 93 с.
Yevtodyeva Marianna
Военно-политическое измерение ОБСЕ: состояние и тенденция развития / М.Г. Евтодьева // Международная жизнь. – 2010. – №11. – С. 79-93.
Bykov Oleg
Международная безопасность: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 2006, 219 с.
Providing Russia’s National Security: Military, Political and Economic Aspects. Ed. by A.G. Savelyev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2007.
Bogdanov Konstantin
Время ad hoc? [Текст] / К. В. Богданов // Россия в глобальной политике. – 2019. – Т. 17. – № 2. – С. 32-45.
Arbatova Nadezhda
Climate threats – a new dimension of EU security. Polis. Political Studies, 6, 81-94. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.06.07
Arbatova Nadezhda
Climate threats – a new dimension of EU security
Related publications
No comments