Reputation and status in Denmark’s strategic culture, Baltic Region, vol. 15, № 3, p. 4–28. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2023-3-1.
ISSN 2310-0532
DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2023-3-1
The primary objective of the article is to evaluate the significance of status and allied reputation within Denmark’s strategic culture. Amongst Danish international relations scholars, there is a well-established notion that one of the key motivations for the use of military force in Danish foreign policy was the aspiration to cultivate special relations with the United States and achieve the status of a privileged ally. This status would confirm guarantees for Denmark’s national security, provide the country with an opportunity for distinctive influence in decision-making and agenda-setting in NATO, the EU, and transatlantic cooperation. A qualitative content analysis of the 2017–2018, 2019–2020 and 2022 Danish foreign policy strategies was carried out to determine the effect of such expert perceptions on the texts of the guiding foreign policy documents. The analysis highlighted and confirmed the ‘super Atlanticism’ tendencies in Denmark’s contemporary strategic culture, revealing its close ties with the Danish perception of the US as the safeguard for the liberal world order and associated multilateral institutions. Denmark’s value-driven militarised foreign political activism in the post-Cold War era is thus not only pragmatic but also ideological as it seeks to promote liberal values, democracy and human rights under American leadership. The article concludes that factoring in status and reputation in strategic culture studies may complement the explanations of security community formation, alliance strategies and the dynamics behind relations within different types of alliances.
Keywords: Denmark | strategic culture | USA | NATO | EU | reputation | special relations | alliance | Northern Europe | Arctic |
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Oznobishchev S.
The New World and Russia NATO Relations.
Belukhin Nikita
Denmark in the Arctic: Robbing Peter to Pay Paul or Feeding the White Elephant?
Vershinin A., Krivopalov Alexey
Российская стратегическая культура: опыт исторической ретроспективы. Вызов российской стратегической культуре заключается в стремлении элит к её упрощению // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21, № 6. С. 80-98. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-6-80-98.
Aleshin Alexander
Роль научного дискурса в стратегическом развитии НАТО // Международные процессы. 2022. № 4 (71). DOI 10.17994/IT.2022.20.4.71.1. URL: http://intertrends.ru/prevyu-statey/rol-nauchnogo-diskursa-v-strategicheskom-razvitii-nato. Опубликовано онлайн: 13.01.2023.
Nikitin Alexander, Klinova Marina
Doctrinal Aspects of the US, NATO and EU Policies in Military Space. Comparative Politics Russia. 2022;13(4):45-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2221-3279-2022-4-13-45-64
Alexander Bratersky
Роль «мозговых центров» в выработке политики по расширению НАТО // США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. 2019. Т. 49, № 5. С. 39-54. DOI 10.31857/S032120680004910-5.
Корзун В.А.
Арктика: горячая пора [Текст] / В.А. Корзун // Прямые инвестиции. – 2014. – № 4 (144). – С. 38 – 43.
Aleshin Alexander
Брюссельский саммит НАТО: прогресс или кризис? [Текст] / А. А. Алешин // Обозреватель-Observer. – 2018. – № 11. – С. 53-62.
Romashkina Natalia, Melnikov D.
Политика России в Арктике: актуальные правовые, экономические и военные проблемы [Текст] / Н.П. Ромашкина, Д.Н. Мельников // Стратегическая стабильность.. – 2017. – № 4. – С. 66-76.
Nikitina Elena
Меняющаяся Арктика: адаптация к изменению климата. Международная инициатива Арктического совета [Текст] / Е.Н. Никитина // Арктические ведомости. – 2013. – № 1 (5). – С. 46 – 53.
Belukhin Nikita
Greenland in U.S. Arctic Strategy: A Challenge for Danish-American Relations?
Belukhin Nikita
«Бунтующий парламент»: период «политики оговорок» в отношениях Дании и НАТО (1982–1988) // Genesis: исторические исследования. 2021. № 4. С. 47–57. DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2021.4.35530.
Arbatova Nadezhda
Relations of the European Union with the United States and NATO: dilemmas of euro-atlanticism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.04.08. EDN: JVFXKD (In Russ.)
Romashkina Natalia
Стратегическая нестабильность: новая миссия России в многополярном мире // Стратегическая стабильность. 2024. № 4 (109). С. 42-46.
Aleshin Alexander
The EU‒NATO Cooperation after the Start of the Special Military Operation
Rogozhin Alexander
Special Economic Zones in Southeast Asia
Svistunova Irina
Turkey and NATO Relations through Assessments of Turkish Experts
Oznobishchev S., Klimov Vasily
NATO defense planning under new military and political conditions
Zagorskii Andrei, Todorov Andrey
Military-Political Situation in the Arctic: Hotspots of Tension and Ways of De-Escalation
Belukhin Nikita
Awkward Partners? The View on The Arctic Dimension of The EU Strategic Autonomy inDenmark and Norway
Related publications
No comments