Реформа иновещания на фоне системного кризиса американской публичной дипломатии // Россия и Америка в XXI веке : электронный научный журнал. 2020. № 4. DOI 10.18254/S207054760013295-1. URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760013295-1-1/ Дата публикации: 30.12.2020.
ISSN 2070-5476
DOI 10.18254/S207054760013295-1
The purpose of this article is to analyze recent developments in the field of the US international broadcasting (concerning both structural changes and leadership replacements) through the prism of crisis that threatens American public diplomacy. In order to achieve this goal author explores the notion of international broadcasting as well as the evolution of the respective American institutions. Through the historical perspective, the article identifies the events that had major impact on the development of the particular public diplomacy instrument. In addition, author studies the main methods applied in international broadcasting by the US for the achievement of public diplomacy goals, namely: promotion of the state’s positive image abroad and surrogate broadcasting in certain regions. Article argues that American public diplomacy has been experiencing the state of stagnation since the end of the 20th century, which brought it on the brink of crisis. In order to prove this hypothesis author applies principles of systemic and historical analysis, while also examining the results of public opinion studies conducted by BBC, Pew Research Center and European Council on Foreign Affairs. In the same context article analyzes changes that have been affecting the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM) broadcasting both during B. Obama’s and D. Trump’s presidencies. Author sees those developments as a first phase of a complex and comprehensive reform that is intended to transform not only the system of international broadcasting but also the American public diplomacy in general. While article concludes that the decisions made by the US political leadership concerning the matter have been logical and consequent until this moment, it also expresses concern over the future of the reform. Because of the extent of the needed transformation and the fact that it requires a lot of time to be completed many factors may arise in the future and influence the final outcome.
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Artamonova Uliana
American public diplomacy during the first year of J. Biden’s presidency
Bakhriev B., Rustamova Leili
Soft Power of a Military Organization: NATO’s Public Diplomacy in Central Asia
Artamonova Uliana
Эволюция институтов российской публичной дипломатии [Текст] / У. З. Артамонова // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. – 2019. – № 3. – DOI: 10.18254/S207054760006903-0. – URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760006903-0-1/.
Artamonova Uliana
Эволюция государственных институтов публичной дипломатии США [Электронный ресурс] / У. З. Артамонова // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. – 2019. – № 1. – DOI: 10.18254/S207054760004625-4. – URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760004625-4-1/.
Artamonova Uliana
J. Biden’s First Term: Renaissance of U.S. Public Diplomacy?
Artamonova Uliana
Обменные программы как инструмент публичной дипломатии США // США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. 2023. Т. 53, № 12. С. 86-98. DOI 10.31857/S2686673023120088.
Rustamova Leili
The mechanism of "soft power" implementation and the limits of its use
Kharitonova Elena
British soft power: comparative analysis of instruments, mechanisms and practices
Rogozhina Natalia
«Мягкая сила» в политике Китая в странах Юго-Восточной Азии [Текст] / Н.Г. Рогожина // Юго-Восточная Азия: актуальные проблемы развития. – 2017. – № 34. – С. 24-33.
Rogozhina Natalia
«Мягкая сила» в политике Китая в странах Юго-Восточной Азии [Текст] / Н.Г. Рогожина //Вестник теоретических проблем = Bản tin Những vấn đề lý luận (Phục vụ lãnh đạo) [на вьетнамском языке]. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 44-49.
Kharitonova E.M. The soft power of the United Kingdom. – Moscow, IMEMO, 2018. – 139 p.
Gadzhiev Kamaludin
О тотализации войны в гибридном измерении [Текст] / К. С. Гаджиев // Власть. – 2019. – № 3. – С. 9-19. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i3.6396.
Rustamova Leili
Публичная дипломатия России в урегулировании конфликта в Сирии [Текст] / Л. Р. Рустамова // Мировая политика. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 33-37. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8671.2018.1.25576.
Rustamova Leili, Bakhriev B.
Особенности публичной дипломатии ЕС в Центральной Азии // Полития: Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз. 2020. № 3 (98). С. 165-180. DOI 10.30570/2078-5089-2020-98-3-165-180.
Gronsky Alexander
Русский Мир в поисках содержания [Текст] / А.Д. Гронский // Россия в глобальной политике. – 2017. – № 4. – С. 186-201.
Kupriyanov Alexey
Дипломатия канонерок в дивном новом мире // Россия в глобальной политике. 2022. Т. 20, № 2. С. 140-150. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2022-20-2-140-150.
Frolov Alexander
Военная дипломатия как история и искусство / А.В. Фролов // Международная жизнь. – 2012. – № 2. – С. 169–178. – Рец. на кн.: История военной дипломатии. В 4-х т./ В.И. Винокуров. – М.: Инженер, 2011.
Chugrov Sergey
The Image of Russia: Deficit of «Soft Power»?
Klinova Marina, Trofimova Olga
France’s Development Assistance Strategy to African Countries. Contemporary Europe, 2024. No 4, pp. 58-72. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0201708324040053
Frolov Alexander
Дипломатия и разведка: две стороны одной медали [Текст] / А.В. Фролов // Международная жизнь. – 2013. – № 11. – С. 178 – 186. – Рец. на книгу: Дипломатия и разведка как средство осуществления внешней политики государства: общее и особенное/ В. Винокуров. – М. 2013. – 300 с.
Related publications
No comments