Divided Societies in the Russian Scientific Discourse
ISSN 2071-5358
DOI 10.31171/vlast.v29i6.8704
The modern world is a global world, which at the same time is more divided than ever before. The problems of divided societies began its development in science in the West back in the 1960s and 1970s. The works of Rokkan, Lipset and Lijphart have deservedly become classics of world political science. In the 1990s, the problem of the division of society became relevant for Russia. Like their foreign colleagues, Russian researchers attract cases from various regions of the world. The purpose of the article is to present the prospects for the development of scientific discourse on the problem of divided societies based on the analysis of Russian studies. According to the author, there is a trend towards expanding the interpretation of the concept of divided societies. If the works of the classics focuses on formalized institutions, then Russian research focuses more on informal practices. A serious problem is associated with the lack of a generally accepted definition of the concept of divided society. The subject field of the concept of divided societies also does not have clear boundaries. The current situation encourages political scientists to read the concept of divided societies in a new way in order to develop an updated middle-range theory that will be important not only for science, but also for the political practice of conflict resolution and tension relief in social processes.
Keywords: cleavage | science discourse | Russia | Rokkan | Lipset | Lijphart |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Bardin Andrey
Civil Society in Russia: Experience of Comparative Analysis
Bardin Andrey
Civil society in russian mass-media discourse.
Ayvazyan D., Krylov Alexander , Poghosyan G., Krivopuskov V.
The Friendliness of Armenia's Communication Regime: Towards the Question of Media and Public Attitudes. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. 2023;(1):94-111. (In Russ.)
Gronsky Alexander
The Byelorussian Imperial Project in the Political Discourse of the Beginning of the 21 Century
Huseynov R., Krylov Alexander , Mobili R.
Conditions and Factors for the Development of Inter-country Communications between Azerbaijan and Russia. Russia & World: Sc. Dialogue. 2023;(1):78-91. (In Russ.)
Zimin Ilya
The Social Challenges to the New Government of Taliban*. Russia & World: Scientific Dialogue. 2023; 2(8): 171-182, https://doi.org/10.53658/RW2023- 3-2(8)171-182
Kupriyanov Alexey
India and the Arctic: searching partners for sustainable development
Aleshin Alexander
Scientific Discourse Role in the Defence Policy of the European Union
Sigachev Maxim, Arteev Sergei
Социально-политические кливажи во Франции и Германии и фактор правого популизма // Международные процессы. 2022. Т. 20, № 2 (69). С. 117-138. DOI 10.17994/IT.2022.20.2.69.4.
Bardin Andrey, Pantin Vladimir
Политизация дискурса по проблемам миграционного регулирования в Европейском союзе [Текст] / А.Л. Бардин, В.И. Пантин // Человек. Сообщество. Управление. – 2017. – Т. 18. – № 3. – С. 6-17.
Gadzhiev Kamaludin
О метаморфозах нового правого дискурса на Западе [Текст] / К.С. Гаджиев // Горизонты экономики. – 2014. – № 6. – С. 57 – 64.
Aleshin Alexander
Роль научного дискурса в стратегическом развитии НАТО // Международные процессы. 2022. № 4 (71). DOI 10.17994/IT.2022.20.4.71.1. URL: http://intertrends.ru/prevyu-statey/rol-nauchnogo-diskursa-v-strategicheskom-razvitii-nato. Опубликовано онлайн: 13.01.2023.
Bogacheva Anastasia
Minorities in Modern Iran: Strategies of “Identity Struggle”
Bardin Andrey
The Problem of Migration in German Academic Discourse
Khaynatskaya Tatiana
Environmental Alarmism as Political Discourse
Arteev Sergei, Bunevich D., Sigachev Maxim
The New Populism in New Europe: Hungarian and Polish Examples in the Scientific Discourse. Post-Soviet Issues. 2022;9(1):92–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2022-9-1-92-110
Sigachev Maxim, Arteev Sergei
Историческое наследие Португалии как фактор разделения и сплочения общества // Международная аналитика. 2022. Т. 13, № 3. С. 116-129. DOI 10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-3-116-129.
Nikolaev Nikolai
Промежуточные итоги развития европейского вектора китайской инициативы «Ледовый Шелковый путь» // Современная Европа. 2024. № 3. С. 196-208. DOI 10.31857/S0201708324030161.
Chugrov Sergey , Peregudov Sergey
QUO VADIS? Перспективы становления гражданского общества в России : по мат. конф. /С.В.Чугров, А.Н.Кокарева, С.П. Перегудов [и др.] // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2012. – № 2. – С. 117–140.
Salitskii Alexander
Россия и Китай на Евразийском пространстве: стратегическое партнерство с элементами конкуренции [Текст] /А.Салицкий, Н.Семенова //Восток. Афро-азиатские общества: история и современность. – 2014. – № 5. – С. 69 – 78
Related publications
No comments