Политика ЕС по достижению технологической автономии от КНР: между Пекином, Вашингтоном и Нью-Дели // Актуальные проблемы Европы. 2024. № 4. С. 106-124. DOI 10.31249/ape/2024.04.06.
ISSN 0235-5620
The EU intensified its efforts to achieve technologic strategic autonomy/sovereignty. The focus is made on China as a key competitor, but the implementation of such a policy depends also on relations with the USA and - especially - India as potential balancer of China. Since 2022, the EU more actively tries to reduce its dependence on Chinese imports and to protect European technology industries. However, to achieve true technological autonomy/sovereignty, policies aimed at developing international partnerships are increasingly important - to improve the sustainability of global value chains (GVC), provide access to non-Chinese manufacturing hubs and innovation ecosystems, and compensate for reduced access to the Chinese domestic market. Accordingly, the EU is promoting an increasingly intensive technological dialogue with India. Efficiency of EU policies is limited. However, the EU's capabilities for a moderate «decoupling» with China and for cooperation with India as a counterbalance to China are limited, on the one hand, by the challenges of economic development of India, which is not yet capable to become a full-fledged hub for the export of innovative goods from European TNCs associated with the traditional high and medium-high technology industries, on the other hand, by the fact that European corporations are partly unable, and partly not ready, to follow Indian government tech priorities. Among other things, the unbalanced nature of the innovation systems of EU member states reduces the EU's ability to develop a new system of international economic relations, while the transformation of innovation systems is impossible without changing the EU's global strategy. As a result, the economic potential of China and the «tech war» of the United States with the PRC become determinants for the technological autonomy of the EU. Presumably, the EU will have to move away from the logic of autonomy / sovereignty in favor of a simple correction of the system of foreign economic relations in the technological sphere.
Keywords: European Union | China | USA | India | technology | strategic autonomy | technological sovereignty |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Danilin Ivan, Sidorova Elena
The concept of technological sovereignty in the transforming world
Sidorova Elena, Sidorov Aleksei
EU Strategic Autonomy in the Economy. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2023;21(3):119-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2023.21.3.74.7
Sidorova Elena
The European Union in combating the Crisis / Russia and the European Union in World Politics: Proceedings of International Conferences. Ed. by M.L.Entin. Moscow, Grif &Co. 2011. Iss. 10. P. 285-293.
Nikitin Alexander, Klinova Marina
Doctrinal Aspects of the US, NATO and EU Policies in Military Space. Comparative Politics Russia. 2022;13(4):45-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2221-3279-2022-4-13-45-64
Gemueva K.A., Salitskii Alexander, Shakhmatov A.
Индия и Китай в мировой экономике, энергетике и политике. М.: Ин-т стран Востока, 2015, 148 с.
Frumkin Boris
Общая сельскохозяйственная и рыболовная политика, сентябрь-ноябрь 2018 г. [Текст] / Б. Е. Фрумкин // Европейский союз: факты и комментарии. – 2019. – № 94. – С. 41-46.
Romashkina Natalia
Информационный суверенитет в современную эпоху стратегического противоборства [Текст] / Н. П. Ромашкина // Информационные войны. – 2019. – № 4 (52). – С. 14-19.
Nevskaya Anastasia, Kvashnin Yuri
EU’s open strategic autonomy concept: Connecting the unconnectable. Russian Economic Journal. 2022;(6):64–77. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33983/0130-9757- 2022-6-64-77.
Frumkin Boris
Общая сельскохозяйственная и рыболовная политика, декабрь 2018 г. - февраль 2019 г. [Текст] / Б. Е. Фрумкин // Европейский союз: факты и комментарии. – 2019. – № 95. – С. 26-30.
Solovyev Eduard
Evolution of the concept of “sovereignty” — is there a place for economic sovereignty in political science? Journal of the New Economic Association, 3 (64), 225–231 (in Russian).
Sidorova Elena
European Union (co-author – Andrzej A. Habarta). Chapter in a monograph, pp. 487–519: Prospects for Economic Globalization / Ed. by A.S. Bulatov. Moscow, Knorus, 2019. – 666 pp.
Romashkina Natalia, Tutnova Tatiana
Space technology in China_s strategy / Romashkina Natalia, Tutnova Tatiana
Salitskii Alexander, Shakhmatov A.
Китай и Индия: новые двигатели глобальной экономики? [Текст] / А.И. Салицкий, А.В. Шахматов // Вестник Российской академии наук=Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – 2013. – Т. 83. – № 5. – С. 453 – 458.
Aleshin Alexander
Scientific Discourse Role in the Defence Policy of the European Union
Frumkin Boris
Заседания Eвропейского совета (саммиты), сентябрь-декабрь 2018 г. [Текст] / Б. Е. Фрумкин // Европейский союз: факты и комментарии. – 2019. – № 94. – С. 5-12.
Frumkin Boris
Заседания Европейского совета (саммиты), октябрь-декабрь 2017 г. [Текст] / Б. Е. Фрумкин // Европейский союз: факты и комментарии.Электронное издание. – 2018. – № 90. – С. 7-12.
Frumkin Boris
Заседания Европейского совета (саммиты), март - май 2019 г. [Текст] / Б. Е. Фрумкин // Европейский союз: факты и комментарии. – 2019. – № 96. – С. 5-9.
Frumkin Boris
Заседания Европейского совета (саммиты), июнь-август 2019 г. [Текст] / Б. Е. Фрумкин // Европейский союз: факты и комментарии. – 2019. – № 97. – С. 5-9.
Frumkin Boris
Заседания Европейского совета (саммиты), март - май 2018 г. [Текст] / Б. Е. Фрумкин // Европейский союз: факты и комментарии. Электронное издание. – 2018. – № 92. – С. 8-12.
Related publications
No comments