Pantin Vladimir
Политические институты в странах ЕАЭС: проблемы адаптации и трансформации // Вестник Пермского университета. Политология. 2020. Т. 14, № 2. С. 88-97. DOI 10.17072/2218-1067-2020-2-88-97.
Publication Type:


ISSN 2218-1067

DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2020-2-88-97

The article is based on a comparative analysis of political institutions in Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Russia - the members of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). The author shows that political institutions in these countries have a number of distinctive characteristics and common features. The latter include a lack of developed party system; the presence of strong institutions of the presidency and of the ruling “party of power”, as well as informal political institutions and practices. Based on an analysis of in-depth interviews with the experts from Armenia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, the author concludes that these countries tend to form ethnic rather than civil nations and identities, which results in the underdevelopment of political institutions. However, due to increasing global and domestic socio-political instability, and worldwide technological and socio-cultural shifts, political institutions in the EAEU countries are forced to adapt to new conditions and undergo transformations. The author shows that the processes of adaptation and transformation of political institutions are more intense in Armenia and in Kyrgyzstan. However, this is closely related to increases in domestic instability and change of power in these countries, while in Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia, these processes are more gradual and long-lasting. Still, such a duration comes along with the risk of delay in the necessary political changes. The article predicts an increase in socio-political instability and the rate of change of political institutions in the EAEU countries in the 2020s, which is associated with the consequences of global technological, sociocultural, and geopolitical shifts.



Russian Science Citation Index



OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC

Kuzmina Elena
Kyrgyzstan in the Eurasian Economic Union: whether only labor migrants were the winner?

Afontsev Sergey
Евразийский экономический союз: надежды и риски [Текст] / С.А. Афонцев // Экспорт вооружений. – 2014. – № 4. – С. 2 – 3.

Volodin Andrey
“Eurasian Union”: geoeconomics and geopolitics

Malysheva Dina
Political Interaction between the Central Asian Participants of the EAEU and the European Union

Borisov Stanislav
Eurasian Economic Union: Particularities of Foreign Trade Statistics

Bredikhin A.
Казачья молодежь в межнациональных и международных отношениях на постсоветском пространстве [Текст] / А.В. Бредихин // Архонт. – 2017. – № 1. – С. 18-23.

Zhukov Stanislav , Kelimbetov K.N.
Kazakhstan. Oil – New Opportunities for Development. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2014. – 180 p.

Frolov Alexander
Наш ближайший союзник: опыт государственности и развития [Текст] / А.В. Фролов // Международная жизнь. – 2016. – № 3. – С. 167 – 175. – Рец. на кн.: Государственность. Национальная идея Беларуси.– М.: Книжный мир, 2016. – 381 с.

Pritchin Stanislav
Features of the Transit of Power in Kyrgyzstan and Georgia in the Context of Emerging Political Institutions

Lapkin Vladimir , Pantin Vladimir
Russia and Ukraine in a Comparative Perspective: Factors of Sociopolitical Polarization.

Lapkin Vladimir , Pantin Vladimir
Global Dynamics of Political Institutions in the Context of the Destabilizing World Order (cases of the EU and Russia)

Ionova Elena
Стратегический союз Казахстана и Узбекистана в геополитике Центральной Азии [Текст] / Е.П. Ионова // Россия и мусульманский мир. – 2014. – №  1 (259). – С. 95 – 105.

Malysheva Dina
Russland und die Migration aus Zentralasien [Text] / D. B. Malyschewa // Welt Trends. Das außenpolitische Journal. – 2018. – Issue 137. – P. 9-13.

Semenenko Irina, Lapkin Vladimir , Bardin Andrey, Pantin Vladimir
Between the State and the Nation: Dilemmas of Identity Policy in Post-Soviet Societies

Kujba Ilyaida
Проблемы и перспективы развития малых ГЭС в Армении [Текст] / И. С. Куджба // Инновации и инвестиции. – 2018. – № 11. – С. 74-77.

Afontsev Sergey
Евразийский экономический союз: сценарии развития интеграции [Текст] / С. А. Афонцев // Бюджет. – 2019. – № 1 (193). – С. 80-83.
Related publications


Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







First news
Institute News
27/02/2024

On February 27, 2024, the website of the Russian International Affairs Council published an article by Ivan Shchedrov "In the Struggle for 'Heavy Luxury': How the Tourism Industry Became a Subject of the Dispute in India-Maldives Relations".

more...

26/02/2024

The Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences held an expert meeting with the University of Mumbai and Observer Research Foundation (ORF) in Mumbai.

more...

Recently Published