The Planned System of Cuba in 1970—1975 in the Context of Joining the COMECON
DOI 10.18254/S207987840029067-2
The paper analyzes changes within the planning system of the Cuban Republic that took place in the context of changing methodological base of planning while entering the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (Comecon). The end of 1960s was marked by a radicalization of the methods of socialist construction: the system of economic register was applied and diminished the role of the category of value. This led to an economic imbalance, loss of control over the costs of production, deterioration of motivation to labour, etc. In addition, the plan of 10 million tons of sugar production in 1970 was not achieved. These factors prompted the Cuban leadership to reconsider the planning methodology and the development strategy, and to rely heavily on the experience of the USSR. Thus, the Soviet Gosplan experts started consulting their Cuban colleagues from the Central planning committee to a greater extent. However, sometimes there was misunderstanding between the parties, which is revealed in the conversations between the Soviet Gosplan head N. Baybakov and Cuban leader F. Castro. Carlos Rafael Rodríguez played a significant role in political economy diplomacy, and gave a speech as a representative of Cuba at the XXVI Comecon session when the country was accepted to the organization. Entering Comecon spurred the process of changes within the Cuban economic policy: the category of value recuperated its significance within the planning system, new annual plans were based on the value indicators and the input-output models. The midterm planning was also reintroduced due to 5-year plans preparation. Cuba integrated the mechanism of plan coordination with the Comecon countries, while the USSR continued to be its most important partner. Nonetheless, the process was slow: the 1971—1975 five-year plan had not been connected to the Comecon mechanism of plan coordination. Cuba insisted on a special attitude due to its low level of development. Cuban economy reconfiguration under the influence of planning mechanisms of Comecon countries favored consolidation of the new System of planning and direction of the economy approved by the decisions of the first congress of the Communist party of Cuba in 1975.
Keywords: Cuba | USSR | Comecon | Fidel Castro | Nikolay Baybakov | Carlos Rafael Rodrí | guez | planning | political economy | economic register | value |
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Arabadzhyan Alexandra
Куба 2019: преемственность и перемены // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 8: История. 2020. № 2. С. 79-88.
Arabadzhyan Alexandra
Tensions Between Cuba and the USSR After the Cuban Missile Crisis: From International Politics to Political Economy
Mirkin Yakov
Как он дышит, так и пишет… [Текст] / Я. М. Миркин // Родина. – 2018. – С. 14-15.
Arabadzhyan Alexandra
Ernesto Guevara’s Position in the Economic Debate on Cuba in 1960-s
Arabadzhyan Alexandra
Политэкономические дискуссии в СССР и на Кубе о сходстве онтологии социализма во взглядах Н. Хессина и Э. Гевары // Диалог со временем. Альманах интеллектуальной истории. 2024. № 88. С. 177-187.
Volodin Andrey
Indian Studies in Soviet Social Studies
Долматова С.А.
Устойчивое развитие в эпоху поликризиса и дезинтеграции: можно ли восстановить глобальное сотрудничество? // Вопросы политической экономии. 2023. № 1 (33). С. 158-172. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.7850947.
Arabadzhyan Alexandra
Ernesto Che Guevara’s criticism of the soviet methods of socialist construction and its eventual application to the contemporary Cuba
Kamkin Alexander
Николай Данилевский и перспективы многополярного мира. Спор о судьбах России и векторах общественного развития // Тетради по консерватизму. 2024. № 1. С. 115-124. DOI 10.24030/24092517-2024-0-1-115-124.
Arabadzhyan Alexandra
Интернациональная солидарность в условиях ограниченных ресурсов: кубинский опыт // Альтернативы. 2020. № 3. С. 117-139. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.3976615.
Afontsev Sergey
Transforming Research Results into Policy Advice: Political Economy Perspective
Sheinis Viktor
The formation of the USSR and its first Constitution.
Peregudov Sergey
Pluralism and Corporatism in the USSR and in Russia (What Is Common and What Is Particular).
Kudrov Valentin
Сталинизм и нацизм: общие и отличительные признаки [Текст] / В.М. Кудров // Политические науки. – 2013. – № 3. – С. 19 – 29.
Arabadzhyan Alexandra
Причины протестов на Кубе в июле 2021 г. // Альтернативы. 2021. № 4. С. 107-125. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.5647114.
Kosolapov Nikolay
1917-1991: попытка ретроспекции (Полемические заметки к 20-летию прекращения СССР) / Н.А. Косолапов // Мир и политика. – 2011. – № 12 (63). – С. 15–31.
Rabotyazhev Nikolay, Solovyev Eduard
Феномен тоталитаризма: политическая теория и исторические метаморфозы. М., Наука, 2005.
Boreyko Anton
Tectology of A. Bogdanov and World-System Analysis in the Theory of International Relations
Maslennikov Alexander
Кластерная структура крупнейших криптовалют и возможности диверсификации рыночного риска инвестиционного портфеля [Текст] / А. О. Маслеников // Инновации и инвестиции. – 2018. – № 11. – С. 22-25.
Related publications
No comments