![Переход быстрорастущих экономик к инновационному развитию [Текст] = Transition to an intensive innovation growth model / И.В. Данилин // Международные процессы = Mezhdunarodnye Protsessy = International Trends. – 2017. – Т. 15. – № 1(48). – С. 49-59.](/dreamedit/pfoto/03346694_374A_8D51_72F4_F2AC7DC2C594_b.jpg)
Danilin Ivan
Transition to an intensive innovation growth model
DOI: 10.17994/IT.2017.15.1.48.5
Transition to an intensive innovation growth model
Publication Type:
DOI: 10.17994/IT.2017.15.1.48.5
Rising global competition and limits of catch-up innovation development orients emerging economies towards qualitative transformations of National Innovation Systems (NIS) for an intensive innovation growth. This process will determine the architecture of international relations, regional and global power balances. The article analyses theoretical provisions related to the opportunities, prospects and factors of this transformation. Some “technology-push” (General Purpose Technologies, emerging technologies, etc.) and “demand-pull” (disruptive innovations) theories are briefly reviewed. Despite contradictions between theories, it is assumed that emerging economies innovation capacity would be determined by their potential to realize both breakthrough technologies and disruptive innovations. Analysis of theories also reveals that innovative institutions and culture as most important factors in this transformation. Still, comparison of institutions and resources of most developed nations with emerging economies gives limited grounds to believe in the possibility of their NIS radical transformation. Nevertheless, we are witnessing an improvement in the institutional and cultural characteristics of emerging economies. A hypothesis of this study, that allows to redefine potential for NIS transformations of emerging economies, is the sectoral nature of innovation institutions development. It is assumed that in certain industries, sectors or clusters
favorable conditions for intensive innovation development are formed, which then can diffuse to the general economy. This makes NIS transformation more realistic (less resources and efforts are needed) and manageable. The communities of practice and innovation are defined as key agents of change.
In conclusion, it is noted that even with a sectoral approach, the success of NIS transformation is not predetermined. Depending on how successfully emerging economies will develop their innovative institutions and culture, it can either widen the development gap between them and the developed nations, or, alternatively, create new opportunities for their leadership.
Keywords: emerging economies | disruptive innovations | radical technologies | institutions | national innovation systems | innovation policy | global processes |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Danilin Ivan
Влияние кризиса на инновационно-технологическое развитие: провал, прорыв, возможность? // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2020. Т. 225, № 5. С. 201-238. DOI 10.38197/2072-2060-2020-225-5-201-238.
Kondrat’ev Vladimir
Инновационная гонка [Текст] / В.Б. Кондратьев // Прямые инвестиции. – 2013. – № 6. – С. 32 – 36.
Dynkin Alexander , Chemezov S.
Дискурс: к открытым инновациям через национальные мегапроекты и наднациональные инновационные системы [Текст] / А.А. Дынкин, С.В. Чемезов // Вестник Академии военных наук. – 2013. – № 2(43).
Fomin Maxim
Life Quality Technologies and Postindustrial Era
Varnavskii Vladimir
Digital technologies and the growing of world economy
Danilin Ivan
Конвергентные (НБИК) технологии: проблемы развития и трансформационный потенциал [Текст] / И.В. Данилин // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения. – 2017. – № 3. – С. 555-567.
Kutsyna Elena
R&D and innovation in the military sector of the United Kingdom economy. Moscow, IMEMO PAN, 2014. – 42 p.
Tsapenko Irina
Социально-психологические факторы технологической модернизации России / И.П. Цапенко, А.В. Юревич // Наука. Инновации. Образование. – 2013. – № 14. –С. 99 – 116.
Danilin Ivan
Инновационная трансформация суперплатформ: тренды и влияние на национальные инновационные системы // Международные процессы. 2020. Т. 18, № 4(63). С. 127-142. DOI 10.17994/IT.2020.18.4.63.2.
Danilin Ivan, Tikhomirov I., Devyatkin D.
Analyses and Forecasting of Smart Grid Technological Dynamics
Kirichenko Irina
Индия: актуальная инновационная политика [Текст] / И. В. Кириченко // Азия и Африка сегодня. – 2018. – № 11. – С. 34-41. DOI: 10.31857/S032150750001787-7.
Ivanova Natalya
Бумажный тигр (о проекте МЭР «Инновационная Россия – 2020») / Н.И. Иванова // Инновации. – 2011. – № 2. – С. 3–4.
Toganova Natalia , , ,
Технологии и инновации в российских СМИ [Текст] / Н.В. Тихомиров И.А. Тоганова, М.А. Каменская, И.В. Храмоин // Инновации. – 2016. – № 10. – С. 29 – 37.
Kudrov Valentin
Выход из кризиса и инновационная модель экономики [Текст] / В.М. Кудров // Общественные науки и современность. – 2013. – № 4. – С. 5 – 15.
Ivanova Natalya
Наука и инновации в полицентричном мире / Н.И. Иванова // Вестник Российской академии наук. – 2012. – Т. 82. – № 8. – С. 698-711.
Tchernoutsan Elena , Arakelova I.V., Truel J. L.
The poles of competitiveness as a model for the organization of French innovation space: specificity, efficiency, the possibility of application for Russia
Kondrat’ev Vladimir
Industry 4.0 and Global Value Chains
Ivanova Natalya, Dezhina Irina, Pipia L.K., Sheliubskaya Nataliya
Analysis of innovation policy and evaluation of its results. Russia (first part).
Ivanova Natalya, Dezhina Irina, Pipia L.K., Sheliubskaya Nataliya
Analysis of innovation policy and evaluation of its results.
Related publications






No comments