От целостности к новому расколу и соперничеству? (миросистема и мировой порядок в меняющихся реалиях) [Текст] / А. В. Рябов // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. – 2019. – Т. 12. – № 4. – С. 32-48. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-4-32-48.
ISSN 2542-0240
DOI 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-4-32-48
The collapse of the Soviet Union and socialist commonwealth contributed to the reconstruction of integrity of the World-System. These changes became a major global transformation of the second half of the XX century. Then there was an opinion that over time the model of liberal capitalism would be established in all countries. However the restoration of the integrity of the global world did not lead to shaping of its homogeneity. New contradictions emerged both between developed and developing countries and within the core countries of the World-System. All of this undermined stability of the system and contributed to the gradual distraction of the unipolar world order. Russia initially tried to be integrated into the new world reality and become the main partner of the USA as a center of the World-System. However the plans of the United States and its allies did not provide that Russia would retain its role as an important and independent actor in world politics. As a result, Russia’s integration into the West did not take place. Nevertheless having made the transition to an independent policy not subordinated to the USA and its allies Russia could not claim to create alternative global social project as the Soviet Union had. To do this Russia had neither resources nor attractive idea for the rest of the world. As China began to turn into economic superpower it seemed that Beijing was not going to offer the world its own social project alternative to liberal capitalism but it claimed only to take place in existing global system corresponding to its economic impact. Situation was changed after the USA in the middle of the 10-th felt in China a serious rival and moved to the policy of deterrence of it. China began to work out its own model of the world order. Now in comparison with the past many experts suppose that Chinese model of the social and political order may be used by other developing countries. Will this lead to emergence of the new global project alternative to the Western liberal capitalism and to distraction of integrity of the World-System? Will there be a new global transformation as a result of current processes? This article is devoted to the analysis of probable prospects of these tendencies of the world development.
Keywords: World-System | world order | integrity | stability | USA | liberal capitalism | alternative global project | Russia | China | US-China relations |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Zagladin N., Kucherenko A.
Global Crisis: Reasons, Consequences and Russia (Returning to What’s Been Read).
Mishin Igor
The Reset of the U.S. - Philippines Alliance
Borokh Olga, Lomanov Alexander
Производительные силы и китайские отношения. Си Цзиньпин обновил стратегию реформ // Россия в глобальной политике. 2024. Т. 22, № 5. С. 120-141. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2024-22-5-120-141.
Mikheev Vasily
Российско-китайские отношения [Текст] / В. В. Михеев // Russia Policy Review [на корейском языке]. – 2019. – Т. 3. – № 2. – С. 30-35.
Sidorova Elena
Which Capitalism Is Better?/ V. Klinov, E. Sidorova // Voprosy Economiki. – 2011. – № 9. – P. 142-151.
Lapkin Vladimir
«Modernization» and «Capitalism»: Rethinking Contemporary Political Change //Polis Journal.Political Studies, 2012, № 6. P. 41-54
Dmitriev Sergey
Американо-китайские внешнеэкономические связи на этапе "частичного разъединения" // США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. 2023. № 8. С. 69-79. DOI 10.31857/S2686673023080072.
Lomanov Alexander
Предвидеть «лебедя», заметить «носорога» // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21, № 1. С. 138-152. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-1-138-152.
Chufrin Gennady
Российско-китайская весна [Текст] / Г.И. Чуфрин // Прямые инвестиции. – 2013. – № 6. – С. 12 – 15.
Salitskii Alexander, Salitskaya E.A.
США – Китай: тупики и парадоксы торговой войны // Вестник Российской академии наук. 2020. Т. 90, № 7. С. 653-663. DOI 10.31857/S0869587320070099.
Gadzhiev Kamaludin
Слово в защиту верховенства вестфальских принципов [Текст] / К. С. Гаджиев // Международная жизнь. – 2018. – № 11. – С. 138-154.
Salitskii Alexander, Semenova N.K.
China’s Silk Offensive
Dynkin Alexander , Telegina Elena
Глобализация и мировой порядок в новых реалиях постковидного мира // Вестник Российской академии наук. 2021. Т. 91, № 7. С. 642-647. DOI 10.31857/S0869587321070033.
Ivanova Natalya, Kuznetsov Alexey, Makarov I., Melvil A., Tschernych M., Yakobson L., Yakovlev A.
Круглый стол по обсуждению статьи А.А. Яковлева «Куда идет глобальный капитализм?» // Мир России. Социология. Этнология. 2022. Т. 31, № 3. С. 6-32. DOI 10.17323/1811-038X-2022-31-3-6-32.
Bubnova Natalia
Trump Administration New National Security Strategy
Культурно-историческая целостность хозяйств западноевропейских стран и России. М., МАКС Пресс, 2009, 176 с.
Davydov Alexey
Генезис значимости Восточной Европы во внешнеполитической стратегии США // Россия и Америка в XXI веке : электронный научный журнал. 2024. № 10. DOI 10.18254/S207054760032872-6. URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760032872-6-1/. Дата публикации: 31.10.2024.
Simoniya Nodari
Новый мировой порядок: от биполярности к многополюсности [Текст] / Н.А. Симония, А.В. Торкунов // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2015. – № 3. – С. 27 – 37.
Bogdanov Konstantin, Kobrinskaya Irina, Frumkin Boris
Гонка на Глобальном Юге, или Битва за мировое большинство. Перспективы России // Россия в глобальной политике. 2024. Т. 22, № 5. С. 80-97. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2024-22-5-80-97.
Trenin Dmitry
"Переиздание" Российской Федерации // Россия в глобальной политике. 2022. Т. 20, № 2. С. 27-33. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2022-20-2-27-33.
Related publications
No comments