The Defence Policy of Denmark after the 2022 Referendum
ISSN 2618-7914
The article deals with the impact of the special relationship with the US on the three aspects of Danish foreign policy: the approach to the EU strategic autonomy, regional defence policy priorities, and Denmark’s readiness to escalate relations with Russia. Using the method of qualitative content analysis of Danish foreign policy strategies, Copenhagen’s current views on the alliance relations with the US are assessed, especially within the framework of Denmark’s turn towards «pragmatic idealism» in foreign policy, which Denmark announced in May 2023, and scrapping the EU defence opt-out following the outcome of the June 2022 referendum. The analysis has shown that maintaining the status of an «exemplary» or «model» ally leads both to contradictions and ignoring traditional mores within the Danish political system and the skewed priorities in financing military and non-military instruments of the Danish foreign policy. Moreover, even in Denmark’s military support of Ukraine, there is a gap between the symbolic value and practical effect of the measures taken by the Danish side. It is concluded that greater involvement in building the EU’s strategic autonomy will reduce Denmark’s interest in further escalation of the conflict in Ukraine and its readiness for rhetorical and practical confrontation with Russia. At the same time, based on open sources, the U.S. is not exerting significant pressure on Copenhagen in connection with select gaps in compliance with the sanction regime. In case D. Trump is elected as the US president in the 2024 elections, Denmark, as one of the most pro-Atlantic EU member states, will probably face the acute task of linking the course of strategic autonomy with a broader vision of the future of transatlantic relations, as well as overcoming the dilemma between the concentration of defence capablities either in the Baltic Sea or in the North Atlantic and Arctic area including Greenland and the Faroe Islands.
Keywords: Denmark | USA | EU | strategic autonomy | NATO | defence | security | Bornholm | Greenland | Baltic Sea |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Belukhin Nikita
Denmark in the Arctic: Robbing Peter to Pay Paul or Feeding the White Elephant?
Ivanov Stanislav ,
Взаимодействие государств Балтийского моря в сфере региональной безопасности [Текст] / В.П. Журавель, С.М. Иванов // Геополитический Журнал. – 2018. – № 1 (21). – С. 40 – 46.
Belukhin Nikita
Greenland in U.S. Arctic Strategy: A Challenge for Danish-American Relations?
Savel'ev Alexander
Ядерное сдерживание, стратегическая стабильность, противоракетная оборона. Даёт ли ядерный арсенал подлинную безопасность государствам // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21, № 5. С. 20-34. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-5-20-34.
Oznobishchev S.
The New World and Russia NATO Relations.
Belukhin Nikita
Awkward Partners? The View on The Arctic Dimension of The EU Strategic Autonomy inDenmark and Norway
Vasiliev Victor
Германия и Вышеградская «четверка»: один за всех и все за одного? // Международная жизнь. 2022. № 6. С. 106-115.
Aleshin Alexander
Роль научного дискурса в стратегическом развитии НАТО // Международные процессы. 2022. № 4 (71). DOI 10.17994/IT.2022.20.4.71.1. URL: http://intertrends.ru/prevyu-statey/rol-nauchnogo-diskursa-v-strategicheskom-razvitii-nato. Опубликовано онлайн: 13.01.2023.
Romashkina Natalia
Широкомасштабная ПРО США: на пути к созданию системы «полноценной» противоракетной обороны [Текст] / Н. П. Ромашкина // Стратегическая стабильность. – 2018. – № 2. – С. 12-23.
Arbatova Nadezhda
Relations of the European Union with the United States and NATO: dilemmas of euro-atlanticism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.04.08. EDN: JVFXKD (In Russ.)
Mizin Victor
О нерешенном аспекте контроля над вооружениями: противоракетная дилемма // Общественные науки и современность. 2023. № 1. С. 68-82. DOI 10.31857/S0869049923010057.
Стратегическая автономия ЕС и перспективы сотрудничества с Россией / под ред. Н.К. Арбатовой, А.М. Кокеева ; ИМЭМО РАН. – М.: Изд-во «Весь Мир», 2020. – 368 с.
Nikitin Alexander, Klinova Marina
Doctrinal Aspects of the US, NATO and EU Policies in Military Space. Comparative Politics Russia. 2022;13(4):45-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2221-3279-2022-4-13-45-64
Danilin Ivan, Sidorova Elena
The concept of technological sovereignty in the transforming world
Frolov Alexander
Пределы обороны и безопасности / А.В. Фролов // Международная жизнь. – 2011. – № 11. – С. 148–147.
Aleshin Alexander
Брюссельский саммит НАТО: прогресс или кризис? [Текст] / А. А. Алешин // Обозреватель-Observer. – 2018. – № 11. – С. 53-62.
Gudev Pavel
Freedom of Navigation in the Baltic (Risks and Challenges for the Russian Federation)
Arbatova Nadezhda
The versatile triangle: EU relations with the USA and China. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No. 6. P. 83-99. (In Russ.).
Prokhorenko Irina
NATO’s partnership policy: From the military alliance to the security community, and back again
Bogdanov Konstantin
Фактор ПРО в Европе: противоречия и кризис режимов контроля над вооружениями [Текст] / К. В. Богданов // Европейская безопасность: события, оценки, прогнозы. – 2018. – № 50 (66). – С. 5-8.
Related publications
No comments