Topychkanov Peter
Nuclear disarmament summits: A proposal to break the international impasse [Text] / K. Davenport, J. Puglierin, P. Topychkanov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2017. – V. 73. – No 4. – P. 264-270.
DOI 10.1080/00963402.2017.1338044
Nuclear disarmament summits: A proposal to break the international impasse [Text] / K. Davenport, J. Puglierin, P. Topychkanov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2017. – V. 73. – No 4. – P. 264-270.
Publication Type:
DOI 10.1080/00963402.2017.1338044
The existing nuclear-disarmament architecture is under considerable stress. Given the international frustration over the slow pace of disarmament within the context of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and uncertainty about the future relationship between Russia and the United States, the prospects for advancing disarmament within politicized processes seem dim. But despite this negative environment, progress is possible. The ban treaty movement is bringing greater international attention to the disarmament impasse, and past successes in the Nuclear Security Summits demonstrate that states are willing to take actions that go beyond consensus statements. A similar set of summits, designed to encourage state-level and multinational efforts to make progress on conditions necessary for disarmament – such as transparency, monitoring, verification, and enforcement – could enable groups of states to move beyond the status quo and address key conditions that will be necessary to achieve disarmament.
Keywords: ban treaty | cruise missiles | Humanitarian Initiative | nuclear disarmament | Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty | Nuclear Security Summit |
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Arbatov Alexey
Controlling Nuclear Arms in a Multipolar World // Survival. 2024. Vol. 66, Issue 6. P. 87-102. DOI 10.1080/00396338.2024.2432195.
Arbatov Alexey
Saving Nuclear Arms Control [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. – 2016. – Vol. 72. – ¹ 3. – P. 165 – 170.
Interconnection between nuclear desarmament and non-proliferation: reality or myth? Edited by Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2011, 89 p.
Arbatov Alexey , Dvorkin Vladimir ,
Russia And The Dilemmas Of Nuclear Disarmament. Eds. A.G. Arbatov, V.Z. Dvorkin, S.K. Oznobishchev. M., IMEMO RAN, 2012, 264 p.(ñåòåâîå èçäàíèå).
Korean Nuclear Crisis: Prospects of De-escalation. Ed. by Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin and Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2013, 61 p.
Nuclear Disarmament, Non-proliferation, Energy: Developing Further U.S.–Russian Cooperation. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2010, 72 p.
The Prospects of Engaging India and Pakistan in Nuclear Arms Limitations. Edited by Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin and Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2012, 54 p.
Prospects of China’s participation in nuclear arms limitations. Edited by Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. M., IMEMO RAN, 2012, 76 p.
Savel'ev Alexander
China and Nuclear Arms Control // Russia in Global Affairs. 2020. Vol. 18, Issue 3 (71). P. 54-69. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-3-54-69.
Non-Nuclear Factors of Nuclear Disarmament (Ballistic Missile Defense, High-Precision Conventional Weapons, Space Arms). Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2010, 67 p.
Prospects for the Transformation of Nuclear Deterrence. Edited by Alexei G. Arbatov, Vladimir Z. Dworkin, Sergey K. Oznobischev. - Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2011. - 73 p.
The prospects of engaging European nuclear-weapon states in strategic arms control. Edited by Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2012, 94 p.
NATO-Russia Relations (Prospects for New Security Architecture, Nuclear Reductions, CFE Treaty) by Alexei G. Arbatov, Vladimir Z. Dvorkin, Sergey K. Oznobishchev and (ðàìêà)Alexander A. Pikaev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2010, 68 p.
Kupriyanov Alexey
Exploring the Impact of Submarine Saturation on Strategic Stability in South Asia // The National Security Journal. 2022. Vol. 3, Issue 4. Art. 8. DOI 10.36878/nsj20220227.08.
Contemporary Nuclear Doctrines. Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin and Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2010, 60 p.
Stefanovich Dmitry
Nuclear Posture and Technology Trends in South Asia and Ways Ahead // The National Security Journal. 2022. Vol. 3, Issue 4. Art. 11. DOI 10.36878/nsj20220301.11.
Strategic Stability after the Cold War by Alexei G. Arbatov, Vladimir Z. Dvorkin, Alexander A. Pikaev and Sergey K. Oznobishchev Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2010, 55 p.
Selezneva Daria
Negotiations on Articles I and II of NPT: History and Lessons Learned In: Orlov, V.A., Semenov, S.D. (eds) Russian-American Nuclear Nonproliferation Dialogue: Lessons Learned and Road Ahead. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. 2022. P. 17-47. DOI 10.1007/978-981-19-1716-5_3.
Bogdanov Konstantin
Russian Nuclear Weapons: Reason or Feeling? // Ethics and Armed Forces : e-journal. 2020. Issue 1. P. 64-69. URL: http://www.ethikundmilitaer.de/en/full-issues/20201-nuclear-deterrence/bogdanov-russian-nuclear-weapons-reason-or-feelings/ (àccessed date: 16.10.2020).
Stefanovich Dmitry
Missile Trends in South-East Asia // Íîâûé îáîðîííûé çàêàç. Ñòðàòåãèè. 2022. ¹ 1 (72). P. 71-76.
Related publications
No comments