
Наука и инновации в 2019–2020 гг.: ресурсное обеспечение, первые посткризисные оценки // Анализ и прогноз. Журнал ИМЭМО РАН : сетевой журнал. 2021. № 1. С. 13-30. DOI 10.20542/afij-2021-1-13-30. URL: https://www.afjournal.ru/index.php?page_id=405 – Дата публикации: 21.05.2021.
ISSN 2713-170X
DOI: 10.20542/afij-2021-1-13-30
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on research and development (R&D) was a major factor for the global innovation activity in 2020. Prior to the pandemic, global R&D spending by both governments and private capital had been steadily increasing for a decade, resulting in a doubling of spending. In the US, growth was slower than in other countries, especially compared to China, causing the US share of global R&D to decline. At the end of 2020, it was clear that China’s economy ended the year with fewer losses compared to the developed world, and local companies continued to increase R&D spending, which will contribute to Chinese innovation competition in the coming years. This 2020 report consists of several thematic blocks which will be retained in subsequent annual editions. First, there is a review and analysis of the most relevant information on countries’ expenditures on research and development (R&D), in particular, the estimates of expenditures according to R&D World, the volume of federal funding for R&D in the USA for 2021, and the results of the annual European Innovation Scoreboard rating of innovative companies. Secondly, the results of international patenting data by country and industry are presented, using the latest available data for 2019. Third, given the importance of private companies’ capital for innovation activity, a separate block includes the results of initial public oerings (IPOs) in 2020 on major stock exchanges (USA) and other platforms, as well as data on mergers and acquisitions, which remain the most important alternative to public oerings for raising capital by technology companies. Finally, the last block deals with changes in the innovation development strategies of the leading countries. The focus here is made on the implications of Brexit for the science and technology development of the UK and the EU taking into account the parties’ agreement on a trade deal for the period after the country’s exit from the Union since January 1, 2021.
Keywords: scientific and technological development | R&D | research and development | science and innovation | technological competition |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Gilkova Olga
Милитаризация науки и ее влияние на развитие экономики [Текст] / О. Н Гилькова // Современная наука: актуальные проблемы теории и практики. Серия: экономика и право. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 78-81.
Ivanova Natalya
Технологический рывок в современной экономике [Текст] / Н. И. Иванова // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. – 2019. – Т. 218. – № 4. – С. 329-338.
Ivanova Natalya
Будущее в настоящем / Н.И. Иванова // Прямые инвестиции. – 2008. – № 5. – С. 4-7.
Shvydko Vitaly
New five-year plan of scientific and technical development of Japan: new highlights in government policy to promote science and innovations
Tsapenko Irina
Социально-психологические факторы технологической модернизации России / И.П. Цапенко, А.В. Юревич // Наука. Инновации. Образование. – 2013. – № 14. –С. 99 – 116.
Dezhina Irina
Matching Grants for Stimulating Partnerships between Companies and Universities in Innovation Area: Initial Effects in Russia / Dezhina Irina
Salitskii Alexander
Chinese Science and Technology in Global Market
Ivanova Natalya
Technological Breakthrough in the Modern Economy
Formation of Interstate Innovation Systems (Case Study of Russia and Belarus). Ed. by Dynkin A.A., Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the RF; Ivanova N.I. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2003. 96 p.
Ivanova Natalya
Фундаментальная наука – системное основание инновационного процесса: интервью [Текст] / Н. И. Иванова ; беседу вела Ж. Комарова // Наука и инновации (Республика Беларусь). – 2018. – Т. 2. – № 180. – С. 8-14.
Kirichenko Irina
Китай: научно-техническое сотрудничество в контексте стратегических установок социально-экономической политики // Инновации. 2020. № 8. С. 89-95. DOI 10.26310/2071-3010.2020.262.8.011.
Bogacheva Olga
Defining the main types of research and development for purposes of shaping state R&D policy in Russia and in OECD countries
Mamedyarov Zaur
Strategic Role of the Pharmaceutical Industry in the Сontext of the Global Pandemic. Journal of International Analytics. 2020;11(4):122-136.
Bogacheva Olga, Feoktistova O.A.
Methodological approaches to assessing the standard costs for R&D
Dezhina Irina
Меняющиеся приоритеты международного научно-технологического сотрудничества России / И.Г. Дежина // Экономическая политика. – 2010. – № 5. – С. 143–155.
Danilin Ivan
Влияние кризиса на инновационно-технологическое развитие: провал, прорыв, возможность? // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2020. Т. 225, № 5. С. 201-238. DOI 10.38197/2072-2060-2020-225-5-201-238.
Zagladin N., Zagladina Kh. T.
Российское образование на перепутье / Н.В. Загладин, Х.Т. Загладина // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2011. – № 6. – С. 170–174.
Bogacheva Olga
Актуальные вопросы организации государственного финансирования НИОКР в странах ОЭСР [Текст] / О. В. Богачева, О. В. Смородинов // Научно-исследовательский финансовый институт. Финансовый журнал. – 2019. – № 2 (48). – С. 37-50. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2019-2-37-50.
Bogacheva Olga, Feoktistova O.A.
State R&D Assignments: Approach to Determining their Budgets Based Normative Costs
Shvydko Vitaly
Changes in the system of government support for science and innovation in Japan
Related publications






No comments