![Научная дипломатия во внешней политике Великобритании: теоретические и институционально-организационные аспекты [Текст] / Е. М. Харитонова // Вестник Московского Университета. Серия 25: Международные отношения и мировая политика. – 2018. – № 2. – С. 61-91.](/dreamedit/pfoto/627CD0BB_E00C_158A_EC9C_5678D5CA6478_b.jpg)
Science Diplomacy in British Foreign Policy: Theoretical, Institutional, and Organizational Aspects
ISSN 2076-7404
In the context of increasingly tense Russian-British relations the UK- Russia Year of Science and Education 2017 offered a window of opportunity to re-establish a constructive dialogue on a number of areas of scientific and technological cooperation, as well as to promote track II diplomacy. Joint activities, held during this year, demonstrated a considerable potential of science diplomacy but revealed substantial differences in the Russian and British views of its objectives and functions. This makes it appropriate to examine the United Kingdom’s experience in science diplomacy and its role in British foreign policy. The first section examines the most common working definition of science diplomacy which differentiates between three categories: ‘science in diplomacy’, ‘science for diplomacy’, and ‘diplomacy for science’. Directly linked to national interests, science diplomacy, can be viewed as a source of ‘soft power’, as an effective conflict prevention and resolution mechanism or as an element of the global governance system. Such multidimensionality of science diplomacy is generally typical of the UK as well. The second section thoroughly examines the development of the discourse on science diplomacy in the British official documents and national science and technology development strategies. The author identifies a fundamental continuity in defining objectives and functions of science diplomacy in the policies of all the Cabinets over the last two decades. Finally, this paper examines organizational and institutional features of science diplomacy in the UK and the activities of the key governmental and non-governmental institutions, societies and organizations engaged in science diplomacy. The conclusion is drawn that British science diplomacy is closely connected with the Kingdom’s key foreign policy objectives and priorities and organically complements more conventional instruments. Moreover, science diplomacy has become all the more important in the light of Brexit.
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Kupriyanov Alexey
Дипломатия канонерок в дивном новом мире // Россия в глобальной политике. 2022. Т. 20, № 2. С. 140-150. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2022-20-2-140-150.
Frolov Alexander
Военная дипломатия как история и искусство / А.В. Фролов // Международная жизнь. – 2012. – № 2. – С. 169–178. – Рец. на кн.: История военной дипломатии. В 4-х т./ В.И. Винокуров. – М.: Инженер, 2011.
Frolov Alexander
Дипломатия и разведка: две стороны одной медали [Текст] / А.В. Фролов // Международная жизнь. – 2013. – № 11. – С. 178 – 186. – Рец. на книгу: Дипломатия и разведка как средство осуществления внешней политики государства: общее и особенное/ В. Винокуров. – М. 2013. – 300 с.
Bakhriev B., Rustamova Leili
Soft Power of a Military Organization: NATO’s Public Diplomacy in Central Asia
Artamonova Uliana
Эволюция институтов российской публичной дипломатии [Текст] / У. З. Артамонова // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. – 2019. – № 3. – DOI: 10.18254/S207054760006903-0. – URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760006903-0-1/.
Artamonova Uliana
Эволюция государственных институтов публичной дипломатии США [Электронный ресурс] / У. З. Артамонова // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. – 2019. – № 1. – DOI: 10.18254/S207054760004625-4. – URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760004625-4-1/.
Artamonova Uliana
Fronts and Forms of Public Diplomacy. Analysis & Forecasting. Journal of IMEMO, 2021, no 2, pp. 49-56. https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2021-2-49-56
Rogozhina Natalia
The Mask Diplomacy of China in Southeast Asia. Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: aktual'nyye problemy razvitiya, 2021, T. I, № 1 (50). Pp. 73–81. DOI:10.31696/2072-8271-2021-1-1-50-073-081
Davydov Oleg
Начало 2019 г.: первый дипломатический ход Пхеньяна [Текст] / О. В. Давыдов // Russia Policy Review [на корейском языке]. – 2019. – Т. 3. – № 1. – С. 19-21.
Rogozhin Alexander
Экономическая дипломатия США в ЮВА (к итогам визита президента Д. Трампа в страны ЮВА) [Текст] / А. А. Рогожин // Юго-Восточная Азия: актуальные проблемы развития. – 2018. – № 2(39). – С. 50-58.
Danilin Ivan
Evolution of the international science and technology cooperation: global trends and russian policies
Artamonova Uliana
American public diplomacy during the first year of J. Biden’s presidency
Rustamova Leili
Публичная дипломатия России в урегулировании конфликта в Сирии [Текст] / Л. Р. Рустамова // Мировая политика. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 33-37. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8671.2018.1.25576.
Volodin Andrey
“Plebeization” of culture - a threat to the national security
Arbatov Alexey
Стратегическая стабильность – оружие и дипломатия. – Москва: Изд-во «Весь Мир», 2021. – 432 с. – ISBN 978-5-7777-0810-6.
Science and science policy: evaluation of results, the selection of projects, priorities. Edited by A. Dynkin, L. Nochevkina, N. Ivanova. Moscow, IMEMO, 1996, 122 p.
Gudev Pavel
Уроки эсминца Donald Cook [Текст] / П.А. Гудев // Россия в глобальной политике. – 2016. – № 4. – С. 35 – 45.
Bredikhin A.
Казачья молодежь в межнациональных и международных отношениях на постсоветском пространстве [Текст] / А.В. Бредихин // Архонт. – 2017. – № 1. – С. 18-23.
Volodin Andrey
Foreign policies of India: a change of the paradigm
Kupriyanov Alexey
Великий южноазиатский поворот [Текст] / А. В. Куприянов // Россия в глобальной политике. – 2018. – № 6. – С. 193-203.
Related publications






No comments