Marginalism and Marxism: The first encounter. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(2):102-132. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-2-102-132
ISSN 0042-8736
DOI 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-2-102-132
The paper discusses a critical episode in the history of economic thought of the 19th century - the first encounter between marginalism and Marxism. It happened in 1884, when Philip Wickstead published a short twenty-page text in the magazine of “scientific” socialism “To-Day” under the laconic title “Das Kapital: a Сriticism”. The paper briefly traces the creative path of Wickstead; considers the reasons that prompted him to make a stand against Marxism; analyzes his main criticisms; describes the reaction to them by his contemporaries (both professional economists and adherents of socialism) and evaluates the place of his work in the history of ideas. It is noted that Wicksteed’s article was not only the first encounter of marginalism with Marxism, but also the first popular exposituion of the theory of marginal utility (in the version of S. Jevons), which was completely new for that time. His criticism was radical in nature, since it was aimed not at revealing partial shortcomings, but at the complete collapse of the Marxist construction and its replacement with an alternative theoretical scheme. Amazingly, none of Marx’s supporters dared to accept Wickstead’s challenge and his criticism was never publicly contested by them. This seemingly inconspicuous event turned out to be of crucial historical significance. Under the influence of Wickstead, the Fabians rejected the labor theory of value and British socialism (in its main part) ceased to be Marxist forever.
Keywords: marginalism | marxism | theories of value | Wicksteed | Marx |
Russian Science Citation Index
OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC
Avtonomov Vladimir , Grigoriev Leonid
The role of Marx’s “Capital” studies in the formation of Russian economists (The roundtable discussion at Lomonosov Moscow State University)
Krasil’shchikov Victor
Karl Marx: 200 years of youth?
Avtonomov Vladimir
The Fate of «Grand Theories» in Economic Science // Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki. 2024. No. 1. Pp. 96–105. DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2024_1_96_105.
Klinova Marina
A View in the Retrospect of Time: A History of State and Business Interaction. Marxist’s Interpretation in the Pre-October 1917 Period // Economic Strategies. – 2017. – No 2 (144). – P. 182-195.
Khoros Vladimir
Ideas living in the time.
Salitskii Alexander
Can we speak of a new social formation in China?
Ranneva Nonna
Теория контрактов как единая дисциплина (к выходу на русском языке книги Патрика Болтона и Матиаса Деватрипонта «Теория контрактов») // Вопросы экономики. 2020. № 5. С. 141-160. DOI 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-5-141-160.
Avtonomov Vladimir
Методология "Основ политической экономии" М.И. Туган-Барановского в сопоставлении "Принципов" А. Маршалла [Текст] / В. С. Автономов // Вопросы теоретической экономики. – 2019. – № 1. – С. 24-29. DOI: 10.24411/2587-7666-2019-10102.
Moiseev D., Sigachev Maxim, Kharin A., Arteev Sergei
Концепция глобального консерватизма.Традиционные ценности как мост между Россией и Западом // Россия в глобальной политике. 2023. Т. 21, № 5. С. 108-123. DOI 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-5-108-123.
Kamkin Alexander
Николай Данилевский и перспективы многополярного мира. Спор о судьбах России и векторах общественного развития // Тетради по консерватизму. 2024. № 1. С. 115-124. DOI 10.24030/24092517-2024-0-1-115-124.
Grigoriev Leonid, Ivashchenko A.
The Theory of Cycle under the Crisis Blow / L. Grigoriev, A. Ivashchenko
Нормативная экономическая теория и модели экономического развития. Материалы теоретического семинара ИМЭМО РАН. Рук. - академик В.А. Мартынов. М., ИМЭМО РАН, 2001, 5 п.л.
Belyanin A., Egorov I.
The Legacy of the Outstanding Economist (The Centenary of Maurice Allais) / A. Belyanin, I. Egorov
Rabotyazhev Nikolay
Between tradition and utopia left-wing conservatism in Russia
Smirnov Alexey
В тисках эмансипации: бесценные традиции и нетрадиционные ценности европейского консерватизма [Текст] / А.Н. Смирнов // Свободная мысль. – 2014. – № 4. – С. 113 – 128.
Zvyagelskaya Irina
Symbols and Values in International Relations in the Middle East
Kuvaldin Stanislav
Ценности ЕС и их защита в европейском законодательстве // Современная Европа. 2020. № 7. С. 37-45. DOI 10.15211/soveurope720203745.
Davydov Alexey
Концепция «продвижения демократии» во внешней политики США [Текст] / А.А. Давыдов // Человек. Сообщество. Управление. – 2017. – Т. 18. – № 4. – С. 22-43.
Prokhorenko Irina
The European Union’s global role: what and how can organizational theory explane
Burkova Elena
Религиозная идентичность как фактор политического развития России // Дискурс-Пи. 2021. Т. 18, № 1 (42). С. 91-113. DOI 10.24412/1817-9568-2021-1-91-113.
Related publications
No comments