Anichkina Tatiyana
Limit missile defense - or expand it?: A Russian response [Text] / T. Anichkina // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2015. V. 71. Issue 2. . 17 20.
Publication Type:


ISSN 0096-3402 (Print), 1938-3282 (Online)

DOI: 10.1177/0096340215571903

Since 2002, when the United States withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the international arms control regime has included no limits on missile defense. Washington wants to keep it that way, insisting that it "will continue to reject any negotiated restraints on US ballistic missile defenses." Many experts believe that missile defense undermines strategic stability; but some argue that missile defense can play a role in denuclearization. Here, Wu Riqiang of China (2015), Tatiana Anichkina of Russia, and Oliver Thränert of Germany (2015) debate whether arms control arrangements should include limits on missile defense—or whether advances in missile defense should be encouraged because they might contribute to disarmament. 


Keywords: anti-ballistic missile treaty | China | intermediate-range nuclear forces | treatymissile defense adaptive approach | radar | Russia | strategic stability | third site | United States |

Russian Science Citation Index



OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON THIS TOPIC

Arbatov Alexey
Arms control in outer space: The Russian angle, and a possible way forward [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2019. Vol. 75. Issue 4. P. 151-161. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2019.1628475.

Arbatov Alexey
The vicissitudes of Russian missile defense [Text] / . Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2018. Vol. 74. Issue 4. P. 227-237. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2018.1486595

Anichkina Tatiyana
The future of US-Russian nuclear deterrence and arms control [Text] / T. Anichkina, A. Pezceli, N. Roth // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2017. Vol. 73. No 4. P. 271-278.

Savel'ev Alexander , Alexandria O.
What Factors Affect Strategic Stability? // Russia in Global Affairs. 2022. Vol. 20, Issue 1. P. 93-111. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2022-20-1-93-111.

Arbatov Alexey
Saving Nuclear Arms Control [Text] / A. Arbatov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2016. Vol. 72. 3. P. 165 170.

Arbatov Alexey
Global Stability in the Nuclear World // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. Vol. 91, Issue 3. P. 364-373. DOI 10.1134/S1019331621030023.

Savel'ev Alexander
China and Nuclear Arms Control // Russia in Global Affairs. 2020. Vol. 18, Issue 3 (71). P. 54-69. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-3-54-69.

Kütt M., Kühn U., Stefanovich Dmitry
Remote monitoring: Verifying geographical arms limits // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2023. Vol. 79, Issue 1. P. 17-21. DOI 10.1080/00963402.2022.2155006.

Yevtodyeva Marianna
Development of the Chinese A2/AD System in the Context of USChina Relations // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 92, Issue Suppl. 6. P. S534S542. DOI 10.1134/S1019331622120048.

Non-Nuclear Factors of Nuclear Disarmament (Ballistic Missile Defense, High-Precision Conventional Weapons, Space Arms). Alexei Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, Sergey Oznobishchev. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2010, 67 p.

Selezneva Daria
Negotiations on Articles I and II of NPT: History and Lessons Learned In: Orlov, V.A., Semenov, S.D. (eds) Russian-American Nuclear Nonproliferation Dialogue: Lessons Learned and Road Ahead. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. 2022. P. 17-47. DOI 10.1007/978-981-19-1716-5_3.

Anton Boreyko, Vernigora Alina, Kislitsyn Sergey
The Infrastructure Competition between the United States and China in Developing Countries // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 92, Issue Suppl. 7. P. S627S635. DOI 10.1134/S1019331622130159.

Dynkin Alexander , Pantin Vladimir
A Peaceful Clash. The US and China: Which Model Holds Out Promise for the Future? [Text] / A. Dynkin, V. Pantin // World Futures: The Journal of Global Education. 2012. V.68. Issue 7. P. 506 517.

Topychkanov Peter
Nuclear disarmament summits: A proposal to break the international impasse [Text] / K. Davenport, J. Puglierin, P. Topychkanov // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2017. V. 73. No 4. P. 264-270.

Kupriyanov Alexey
Exploring the Impact of Submarine Saturation on Strategic Stability in South Asia // The National Security Journal. 2022. Vol. 3, Issue 4. Art. 8. DOI 10.36878/nsj20220227.08.

Problems and prospects of Russia US / NATO cooperation in the sphere of ballistic missile defense. Executive editor: Trubnikov V.I. - Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 2011. - 40 p.

Makarevich Gleb
Same Same, but Different: Strategic Relations in the Russia-India-China-U.S. Quadrangle // Russia in Global Affairs. 2023. Vol. 21, Issue 3. P. 205-208. DOI 10.31278/1810-6374-2023-21-3-205-208.

Arbatov Alexey
Understanding of the US-Russia Nuclear Schism [Text] / A. Arbatov // Survival. 2017. Vol. 59. No 2. P. 33-66.

Mishin Igor
U.S. Policy in the South China Sea During the Presidency of D. Trump // Russian Politics & Law. 2021. Vol. 58, Issue 3-4. P. 155-172. DOI 10.1080/10611940.2022.2111939. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10611940.2022.2111939?journalCode=mrup20. Published online: 06.10.2022

Kireeva A., Kupriyanov Alexey
Russia and Quad Plus Is There a Way Forward? // Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs. 2020. Vol. 3, Issue 5. P. 210-228.
Related publications


Comments (0)

No comments

Add comment







First news
Institute News
27/11/2023

On November 27, 2023, the scientific-expert forum «Primakov Readings» started its work in Moscow. It is an annual international meeting of experts to discuss scenarios of the development of international relations, challenges in the sphere of international security, as well as new models of interaction of global political actors.

more...

27/11/2023

On November 27-28, 2023 the IX International Forum "Primakov Readings" will be held in Moscow at the World Trade Center. The theme of the Forum is "Postglobalization Horizons"

more...

Recently Published